- Joined
- Apr 15, 2018
- Messages
- 2,484
- Reaction Score
- 17,914
Respect Sams opinion. But Trey would need to average like 18/6/4 w/ exceptional shooting numbers to sniff lotto IMO
Everyone says it's a weak draft next year.Respect Sams opinion. But Trey would need to average like 18/6/4 w/ exceptional shooting numbers to sniff lotto IMO
One thing that people are forgetting is he’s coming back to be the de facto point guard. That’s what the NBA told him. He’s not built right physically for the 2, even with more weight. They told him to bulk up some and show everyone what you can do as the primary ball handler.Everyone says it's a weak draft next year.
Played well as such when Nembhard was injured freshman year.One thing that people are forgetting is he’s coming back to be the de facto point guard. That’s what the NBA told him. He’s not built right physically for the 2, even with more weight. They told him to bulk up some and show everyone what you can do as the primary ball handler.
Ashworth will play some there but he will be a spot up guy a lot more than he was at Utah St.
Kaluma was one of my least favorite players to watch in the country this past season, I don't think you'll miss him. He looks the part but there's a lot missing from his game.Art is ready to move on and we are basically ready too, including the staff. I don’t think there’s any smoke to this story.
No one wants to see a player get injured especially in the gruesome manner that Nembhard did with is broken wrist against St. John's in 2022. Having said that though, it benefitted Alexander as he got pushed into being the primary ball handler and PG for the rest of that season giving him much needed experience.One thing that people are forgetting is he’s coming back to be the de facto point guard. That’s what the NBA told him. He’s not built right physically for the 2, even with more weight. They told him to bulk up some and show everyone what you can do as the primary ball handler.
Ashworth will play some there but he will be a spot up guy a lot more than he was at Utah St.
I don't know if this was a bit or not, but you made me laugh regardless.A case could be made that Creighton upgraded this offseason. They have to figure out how to play King and Kalkbrenner together.
I don't know if this was a bit or not, but you made me laugh regardless.
We just won a national title throwing up 25 3s and not playing our 2 dominant bigs together. Are you suggesting we’d have won my MORE if we did?Or they could have everyone stand 25 feet from the basket and launch contested threes. See where that gets them. Just ask the Celtics.
We've got Ball, probably looking for a veteran 2 instead of another freshman.We were in on this guy at one point
Creighton's starting 5 was so stacked, and probably will be again. I think Trey is capable of that statline if there weren't so many people that needed the ball in the starting lineup. The guy can take and make tough shots. Just a little short for the SG position, especially one that is best as a 1-on-1 scorerRespect Sams opinion. But Trey would need to average like 18/6/4 w/ exceptional shooting numbers to sniff lotto IMO
He was viewed as their best pro prospect for much of this year, but I think he got lost in the shuffle a bit as Creighton "underachieved". Kobe Bufkin and Colby Jones stole some of his heat. He likely would have been an early 2nd round pick. He had good, not great efficiency on above average but not high usage. He did measure 6'3.25" without shoes, which is small for a 2G, but 6'10" wingspan makes up for that. But he also tested poorly on the vert.Creighton's starting 5 was so stacked, and probably will be again. I think Trey is capable of that statline if there weren't so many people that needed the ball in the starting lineup. The guy can take and make tough shots. Just a little short for the SG position, especially one that is best as a 1-on-1 scorer
I was always confused why he never got much pro hype. imo was a bit underrated since Creighton also had Nembhard, Kaluma, and Kalkbrenner
We just won a national title throwing up 25 3s and not playing our 2 dominant bigs together. Are you suggesting we’d have won my MORE if we did?
Wrong.Most of the people arguing that only playing 1 big is a good idea were the same people arguing that playing no bigs was a good idea just a few years ago.
You didn’t address the first point, and I don’t remember anyone advocating for no bigs ever. Maybe you’re remembering some post loss anger take?Most of the people arguing that only playing 1 big is a good idea were the same people arguing that playing no bigs was a good idea just a few years ago.
Nobody ever said no bigs. People did say 5 shooters/5 out. Like we used on occasion in last season's top 5 offense when Adama was screening on perimeter or popping for 3s. Our offense got even better when we moved away from Adama in low post and moved him often up to high post or arc.You didn’t address the first point, and I don’t remember anyone advocating for no bigs ever. Maybe you’re remembering some post loss anger take?