Big East OOC Thread 23/24 | Page 37 | The Boneyard

Big East OOC Thread 23/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
This level seems like it's too much for Ashworth, I've noticed this in every Creighton game. It really hurts them.
 
87Xfer said:
https://x.com/CreighTakes/status/1741186707360247875?s=20

how do we actually embed live tweets again? maybe someone else can...it's Shaka actually playing 6th man on the court today :eek:
Expand ...

Gotta type the HTML in manually (copy & paste link between the MEDIA brackets)

Screen Shot 2023-12-30 at 4.07.48 PM.png
 
.-.
auror said:
I like Shaka a lot, but that actually is pretty annoying and Tech-able if he's doing it near the ballhandler on the court.
Expand ...
I guarantee you Hurley would get a T on that sh..! He was on floor ten feet from where the play was and was heading.
 
Great comeback win for Marquette. Sean Jones is going to be something special if he can keep his energy under control and build on this three point performance

Shaka is a pretty good defender. Dude needs to get off the court while the game is going on..
 
Chico Carter could be annoying in our games against DePaul. Think Primo Spears last year
 
16 fouls on Creighton vs 7 on Marquette. That seems hard to believe. Not surprising they let Shaka play D.
 
.-.
Hi-Low said:
on a side Houston concludes their insanely difficult non-conf slate today looking to go 13-0 with a home game vs Penn ;)
Expand ...
Speaking of Big 12 teams that will be fun watching get exposed once they have to play someone besides a folding chair in conference, BYU
 
St. John's and DePaul both win.

84-37 (27-23).

That concludes the OOC portion of the schedule for all Big East teams.

I believe the league is going to get five bids to the tournament based on finishing between 83 and 87 wins OOC.

Overall, the Big East did well against P5 competition but underperformed against non-P5 opponents.
 
shizzle787 said:
St. John's and DePaul both win.

84-37 (27-23).

That concludes the OOC portion of the schedule for all Big East teams.

I believe the league is going to get five bids to the tournament based on finishing between 83 and 87 wins OOC.

Overall, the Big East did well against P5 competition but underperformed against non-P5 opponents.
Expand ...

Big East is the #3 conference in KenPom and I think we will close the gap with the SEC because the Big East played fewer low majors, which will be a drag on the SEC as the season wears on.

I think just over half the league gets bids.
 
REB1094 said:
Great comeback win for Marquette. Sean Jones is going to be something special if he can keep his energy under control and build on this three point performance

Shaka is a pretty good defender. Dude needs to get off the court while the game is going on..
Expand ...
Jones and Joplin had 4 wide open unguarded 3’s toward the end that turned that game. Yes they made them but that was terrible defense by Creighton.
 
jibsey said:
Jones and Joplin had 4 wide open unguarded 3’s toward the end that turned that game. Yes they made them but that was terrible defense by Creighton.
Expand ...
tbh that would have been a blowout if Marquette didn't miss like 20 open threes
 
.-.
Not impressed with Kalkbrenner at all. Or maybe it’s the team that’s making him look bad. They don’t prioritize him at all. Schierman (sp) has serious range. He’s good.
 
GlastonTim said:
Not impressed with Kalkbrenner at all. Or maybe it’s the team that’s making him look bad. They don’t prioritize him at all. Schierman (sp) has serious range. He’s good.
Expand ...

They went from three good defenders to two with Kaluma leaving. Not to mention Nembhard is a better defender than Ashworth.

Last year he scored a ton on pick and rolls and Nembhard was the main initiator of that.
 
jdb50 said:
16 fouls on Creighton vs 7 on Marquette. That seems hard to believe. Not surprising they let Shaka play D.
Expand ...

That’s ridiculous the way Marquette plays D. They are allowed to hold, bump and hip people all game why, because their coach can slap the floor? That needs to end and sorry, Shaka was always like that never liked him. He can coach but he thinks a lot of himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: caw
caw said:
They went from three good defenders to two with Kaluma leaving. Not to mention Nembhard is a better defender than Ashworth.

Last year he scored a ton on pick and rolls and Nembhard was the main initiator of that.
Expand ...

Ashworth can’t guard anyone. They do play pretty good team defense but the loss of Kaluma does hurt them overall. But remember they practice to not foul:eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: caw
GlastonTim said:
Not impressed with Kalkbrenner at all. Or maybe it’s the team that’s making him look bad. They don’t prioritize him at all. Schierman (sp) has serious range. He’s good.
Expand ...
He seems like a gunner and ball stopper. I'd like to see some advanced efficiency statistics to see if that's true or not, if anyone has some.
 
HooperScooper said:
He seems like a gunner and ball stopper. I'd like to see some advanced efficiency statistics to see if that's true or not, if anyone has some.
Expand ...
PER - #1 on his team at 26.5. For reference our #1 is Clingan at 36.4 (lol)

Block% - Kalk is at 6.4%, #1 on his team and pretty high above #2 (Fred King 3.7%). For reference Clingan is 9.9%

TS% - He's down a bit on his team at 66.8%. For reference DC is 61.6%

Offensive win shares - He's 2nd on his team at 1.4. #1 is Scheierman 1.6. For reference Newton and Cam are 1.7, then Clingan/Karaban are next at 1.3

Defensive win shares - He's actually 3rd on his team. Trey 1.0, Baylor 0.9, Kalk 0.8. For reference our top 3 are Newton 1.0, Karaban 0.9, Cam 0.8. Karaban and Cam being >= Kalkbrenner makes me distrust the defensive win shares statistic

Offensive +/- - He's 3rd on his team at +6.1. #1 is Scheierman 7.5, Miller 7.0. For reference our top 3 are DC 8.6, Newton 6.4, Cam 6.0

Defensive +/- - He's actually 2nd at 3.2, behind Farabello (??) at 4.2. Our top 2 are Diarra 3.7, Singare and Roumoglou are 2 and 3 but I won't count them, so next is Newton at 3.0 (Clingan 2.9)

Total +/- - 2nd on his team at 9.3, behind Scheierman at 10.3. Our top 2 are Clingan 11.5 and Newton 9.5
 
.-.
REB1094 said:
PER - #1 on his team at 26.5. For reference our #1 is Clingan at 36.4 (lol)

Block% - Kalk is at 6.4%, #1 on his team and pretty high above #2 (Fred King 3.7%). For reference Clingan is 9.9%

TS% - He's down a bit on his team at 66.8%. For reference DC is 61.6%

Offensive win shares - He's 2nd on his team at 1.4. #1 is Scheierman 1.6. For reference Newton and Cam are 1.7, then Clingan/Karaban are next at 1.3

Defensive win shares - He's actually 3rd on his team. Trey 1.0, Baylor 0.9, Kalk 0.8. For reference our top 3 are Newton 1.0, Karaban 0.9, Cam 0.8. Karaban and Cam being >= Kalkbrenner makes me distrust the defensive win shares statistic

Offensive +/- - He's 3rd on his team at +6.1. #1 is Scheierman 7.5, Miller 7.0. For reference our top 3 are DC 8.6, Newton 6.4, Cam 6.0

Defensive +/- - He's actually 2nd at 3.2, behind Farabello (??) at 4.2. Our top 2 are Diarra 3.7, Singare and Roumoglou are 2 and 3 but I won't count them, so next is Newton at 3.0 (Clingan 2.9)

Total +/- - 2nd on his team at 9.3, behind Scheierman at 10.3. Our top 2 are Clingan 11.5 and Newton 9.5
Expand ...
Thanks. I was actually talking about Scheierman but you provided the top 2 or 3 in each category so it looks like he's much better than what I thought he is. What's Scheierman's PER?
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,285
Messages
4,561,387
Members
10,455
Latest member
UConnGabby


Top Bottom