Fire Kim English.
He probably needed a few more developmental years before getting that job.He seems like a nice guy in every interview I have seen of him, I think he comports himself well on the sideline, and I like what I see in game plan and in game coaching, but he is just not a winner. He is kind of like Tim Welsh that way.
This team is too talented to be losing almost every 50/50 game.
Guy can recruit. He needs a tactician on his staff that can run XO's, analytics and help him manage a game.He probably needed a few more developmental years before getting that job.
He brought in essentially an offensive coordinator from the NBA this offseason, Bryan Tibaldi. Was briefly a Cavs assistant (but had some college experience before that).Guy can recruit. He needs a tactician on his staff that can run XO's, analytics and help him manage a game.
Be interesting to see what GM was the year before he got there. If bad, then you could call that a mild turnaround. Simply not enough runway for a High D1 job.He brought in essentially an offensive coordinator from the NBA this offseason, Bryan Tibaldi. Was briefly a Cavs assistant (but had some college experience before that).
It's worked.
View attachment 115877
Correct. He even pretty wildly underachieved in the season before he got the PC job from a predictive lens (albeit after overachieving in his first season despite winning less games). His 2 years at GM were pretty similar to Paulsen's run. Tony Skinn immediately did much better, and is wasn't with Kim's guys since Kim took most of them with him to PC.Be interesting to see what GM was the year before he got there. If bad, then you could call that a mild turnaround. Simply not enough runway for a High D1 job.
defensive coordinator probably needs to be the next hireHe brought in essentially an offensive coordinator from the NBA this offseason, Bryan Tibaldi. Was briefly a Cavs assistant (but had some college experience before that).
It's worked.
View attachment 115877
I like it - will add some juice for the fellas, as it seems they need a little right about now.Seton Hall enters the rankings @ #25 ahead of tomorrow's matchup
needs a modern day George Blaney type.Guy can recruit. He needs a tactician on his staff that can run XO's, analytics and help him manage a game.
And we do @ #3Seton Hall enters the rankings @ #25 ahead of tomorrow's matchup
Butler that low? They were decent until this decade and Hinkle is a very well-known arena compared to some of these other schoolsIf I had to rate which of the other programs would be best for the Big East if they were good:
1) Villanova - most history, big city, fan base extends beyond alumni. Penn State has a lot of alumni in Philadelphia, but Penn State sucks at hoops and Temple is marginalized in a midmajor conference. Villanova has a lot of upside and potential for a national following if it was consistently good again.
2) St. Johns - Capital of the World, wealthy fan base beyond alumni, good, if old, history, no local competition. It would be really good for the Big East if St. Johns became a powerhouse.
3) Depaul - Big city, good ancient history, most upside of any program. Big enough city that it can have a fan base at the same time as Illinois. Huge local corporate market for NIL and financial support if Depaul stops sucking. There is a very high ceiling with this program if it can get out of its own way.
4) Georgetown - Elite academic university with a very wealthy alumni base and it is the only major program in a very big metro area. Virginia is 2.5 hours away, and Maryland has an inconsistent history. Georgetown being good would be a big boost for the league.
5) Providence - Some good history, although it is mostly a history of mediocrity. Providence benefits from a wide-open New England market with BCU giving up and UMass being marginalized. There is a big fan base beyond just its alumni if Providence gets better.
6) Marquette - in a relatively big metro area, very good history, access to lots of corporations for NIL. Good upside.
7) Creighton - Does really well in a small/mid-sized metro area. Like Louisville vs. UK in the state of Kentucky, Creighton and Nebraska are pulling from different populations culturally, which enables Creighton to co-exist and succeed despite Nebraska being a behemoth. There is a ceiling though because the market is not that big.
8) Seton Hall - NY/NJ is a huge market, and there is kind of room for both SHU and SJU, but SHU will always be the little brother. Decent history is a plus. Also, the school is so bad academically that I feel like it makes some fans reluctant to get too invested in the program.
9) Xavier - Good history but crowded market with Cincinnati right there and Dayton close. Ohio State is everyone's daddy in Ohio, and Indiana, Kentucky and Louisville are not that far away. Solid program, not a lot of upside.
10) Butler - neat little program sandwiched between two basketball behemoths in Purdue and Indiana. There is a ceiling on Butler's fan base.
My criteria are:
A) Potential market size
B) Economic profile of metro area
C) Program history to leverage in building a larger fan base
D) Local competition for fans
E) Academics play a role to the extent that non-alumni are more likely to get behind a school with better academics. Not a major issue, but a factor.
Butler that low? They were decent until this decade and Hinkle is a very well-known arena compared to some of these other schools
A little scary how Nova is handling them in the first half.Providence when they aren’t playing us can’t defend or score. Fitting.
They are playing well. Acaden Lewis will win Big East ROY if he continues at this pace and they make the tournament with a good seed.A little scary how Nova is handling them in the first half.
Kim English needs to be launched into a volcano, he's a horrendous coach.Kim English wanted a specific high paced offensive style and accordingly hired a Cleveland Cavs assistant to coordinate the offense. HHe needs to hire a defensive assistant coach who only focuses on defense. PC plays some awful undisciplined defense.