- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 3,551
- Reaction Score
- 12,292
It'd be a mistake to expand just for the sake of it. None of this brainstorm list make a lot of sense.
Kansas
Gonzaga
Baylor
VCU has been a top-50 team in seven of the last ten years. Dayton has been a top-75 team in eight of the ten years.VCU, Dayton etc…. Will take more from the league in revenue than they will ultimately bring in and make the conference on average weaker rather than stronger.
No, no and no.
we already have DePaul.
VCU has been a top-50 team in seven of the last ten years. Dayton has been a top-75 team in eight of the ten years.
Comparing these two schools to DePaul (one top-100 finish this decade) makes no sense at all.
We'll be fortunate to have either of these teams join the Big East. Great locations, attention to basketball, rabid fans.
You're talking UMass.Throw out all of your partisan rooting interests and think of this like a mathematician working for Fox Sports with a job to perform.
Which school adds the largest potential fanbase that would realistically say yes to the offer?
Which school brings the Big East to a new state with a flagship university that again would accept the offer?
And if the answer turns your stomach you are just adding fuel to the fire with that angst. Great sporting events that draw TV audiences are largely built around that stomach turning angst otherwise known as a "RIVALRY".
What about schools that have historically been good, or have the potential to be good? Maybe in a better league they start to rise again? St. Joe's? BU? Maybe those are bad examples. I'm sure the board could come up with better north-east'ish schools that might be a good fit.
None obviously that are as good as Gonzaga, but they didn't get there overnight either.
nextpittsburgh.com
Good school. Terribly dying city.St Louis is the most over-rated expansion candidate of any the the names being tossed around. Packed arena? They average just over 50% capacity. Recent Top 25 program? 4 NCAA tourney appearances over the last 20 years. Not the best candidate by any means.
It makes all the $ense in the world.It'd be a mistake to expand just for the sake of it. None of this brainstorm list make a lot of sense.
You're talking UMass.
I'd put Loyola Chicago in the tier 2-3 although Depaul would probably nix it. Loyola is on of the biggest Catholic schools in the country and has success recently.I see the answer to this in three tiers.
Tier 1: Kansas, ND, Gonzaga would be a slam dunk, take them whatever it takes to make them work. However, as discussed: Zags are too far, Kansas has their football to think about (really they need to just drop it), and ND is tied tight with ACC. So unless a miracle happens, I wouldn't want to lose the round robin.
Tier 2: That being said, if they HAD to take new team(s), I could see Dayton and VCU both stepping up to the next level. Dayton already fills the stands really well and VCU has a bit of history as well. But does FOX really see the benefit? If they do, I'd be ok-ish with it.
Tier 3: SLU and UMass... ummm.... uh... do we need it to close the deal with FOX? Well I guess you gotta do what you gotta do, but I wouldn't be happy about it. Maybe someone thinks they'd bring something after the move? There's a lot of risk in this, and I don't think odds are good of either actually bringing value.
I don't see any other possibilities.
Omg. Yuck, yuck, yuck and yuckiest!Holy Cross
St Bonaventure
St Joe’s
Fordham

The Big East is not saturated in MASS, we have no presence there at all which is a shame, and I remember the 90's very well, there was UMASS Mania in that state just like Husky Mania in CT. They have a large fanbase it's just kind of dormant right now, add UMASS to the Big East and they will wake up. UMASS to the Big East would also be a kick in the teeth to BC which is nice.I don’t think UMass is a great addition given the Big East’s saturation in the Northeast. They don’t really even bring an audience. UMass is kind of loathed in Eastern Mass where the eyeballs are.
Your first mistake, never say "never, ever" in conference realignment. Kansas may not have a choice, I don't see the Big 12 existing down the road.Kansas: will never, ever join the Big East. Insane to even think of it. The only league they'd leave for is the B1G.
Eh, maybe. That was a unique UMass team. It took a very crooked coach, no academic or behavioral standards and paying the best player in CT to go there in order to catch that lightning in a bottle. That stuff would never fly there now.The Big East is not saturated in MASS, we have no presence there at all which is a shame, and I remember the 90's very well, there was UMASS Mania in that state just like Husky Mania in CT. They have a large fanbase it's just kind of dormant right now, add UMASS to the Big East and they will wake up. UMASS to the Big East would also be a kick in the teeth to BC which is nice.
I believe a team can be a member in a conference for a single sport if their main conference doesn't offer it. That's why it happens in football and done Olympic sports primarily, and why the Big Ten teams had to play in their hockey conference.Why couldn't Gonzaga be a basketball only? This is a basketball league that should do everything in its power to put the best basketball product on TV. Gonzaga isn't SDSU, they will survive post Few, even if they aren't ranked top 5 every single year. Dayton and VCU are interesting from strictly a program strength perspective.