- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,619
- Reaction Score
- 35,832
Correct. They got the name and $10,000,000, leaving behind $100,000,000.Which I believe was in the area of $100m all said and done.
Correct. They got the name and $10,000,000, leaving behind $100,000,000.Which I believe was in the area of $100m all said and done.
In other words, they didn’t pay anything.“The Catholic 7 are leaving the Big East as they announced earlier in the basketball season, and it seems that the league they are joining will be the Big East. At least according to a report from ESPN's Brett McMurphy, Andy Katz and Dana O'Neill, the Catholic 7 (Villanova, St. John's, Georgetown, Marquette, Providence, Seton Hall and DePaul) will purchase the Big East name from the FBS football schools for an undisclosed sum of money (reportedly agreeing to "take considerably less money from a reserve pool," of exit fees and NCAA Tournament shares that was held by the conference).” SBNation
“The sale of the Big East name is not an exchange of cash. Instead, the so-called Catholic 7 will pay primarily by leaving behind much, if not all, of the money they would have received from the exit fees of other departing universities and the entry fees from new members, according to two people who have been briefed on the negotiations. The Catholic universities will not pay departure fees.” The NYT
Which I believe was in the area of $100m all said and
Your analogy to the Big 8 breaks down because the Big XII was never a successor conference to the Big 8. No way in the world were Texas, Texas A&M, and the rest ever going to apply for admission to the Big 8, pay entrance fees, and adopt the rules of the Bug 8. The Big XII was an entirely new entity in which teams from 2 different former conferences came together to form the new league. That was never the case with the Big East.Because the world revolves around legal technicalities.
Food for thought, the Big XII was not a continuation of the Big 8. That is despite the fact that it contained all 8 original schools. The fact is the 8 schools left the Big 8 and began a new conference. As did the Catholic 7. The main difference is that the Big 8 ceased to exist while the Big East didn’t. The Catholic 7 simply bought the name, but the American was and is the legal successor of the Big East. It even inherited the Big East’s BCS autobid for a single season before that was blown up.
Go to the wiki page for the Big East, and you’ll see a heading, “Original Big East (1979-2013)”. You’ll see that there because that is how the situation is viewed by the world at-large.
If Wake Forest, NC State, Duke, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Louisville, Georgia Tech all left and started a conference and bought the name ACC from the conference, it would be a new conference. Even with overlapping membership. And in future years, people could talk about remembering FSU dominating the old ACC and people would know exactly what was meant. If someone piped in and said “but FSU wasn’t in the old ACC“, they could both be accurate (FSU didn’t join for decades) and misleading (clearly FSU was in the old entity known as the ACC).
So while you are accurate that West Virginia was not a founding member of the Big East and therefore was not in the old BE circa 1980, West Virginia was clearly a member of the old conference once known as the Big East. Georgetown could say they were in both iterations of the Big East, but that doesn’t make the New Big East the same thing as the Old Big East.
Yes, but the $100 million was going to be divided up in some way, so it’s not like they were ever going to get $100 mill.Correct. They got the name and $10,000,000, leaving behind $100,000,000.
Like the Big XII was not a successor to the Big 8, the new Big East was not a successor conference to the old Big East. Villanova and company voted to leave the Big East and followed the Big East bylaws when exiting the league. The BE commissioner stayed in the BE offices in Providence. Those leaving created a new conference with new bylaws and new officers in a new headquarters. They subsequently bought the name of the Big East. And thus was born “old Big East” and “new Big East”, different entities demarcated by the corresponding adjectives. Like Texas and the Big 8, Butler has no relation to the old Big East.Your analogy to the Big 8 breaks down because the Big XII was never a successor conference to the Big 8. No way in the world were Texas, Texas A&M, and the rest ever going to apply for admission to the Big 8, pay entrance fees, and adopt the rules of the Bug 8. The Big XII was an entirely new entity in which teams from 2 different former conferences came together to form the new league. That was never the case with the Big East.
You’re still stuck on the $100 mill as the only thing that mattered, ignoring the $35 mill in fees that they kept and ignoring the Big East name and the MSG tournament, both of which had tremendous value. It’s like a divorce in which one party gets cash but the other gets cash, an investment portfolio, the mansion on 10 acres, and the Rolls. And then the one with the cash thinks he got it all.When you are 7 schools leaving 3 existing members (UConn, USF and Cincy) and forfeit 91% of the cash reserves of an entity... you're paying something
You can be as confused as you want, but facts are facts and the facts here are easy and clear. There was a Big East conference that was a non-profit corporation. When the Catholic five left it after the defection of too many football schools, the new corporation that the Catholic schools founded in 2013 or so bought the Big East name from the Big East conference, which changed its name to the American.How much did the C7 pay for the name that they “bought”.
Just to understand what you’re saying, you’r contending that the Big East name belonged to schools like Cincinnati and South Florida but not to schools lie the C7, five of whom were founding members and along with us, BC, and SU, paid for the creation of the name in the first place. And the iteration with exists today, whose core is 6 of the 8 founding members is some new entity which bought its name and is not a continuation of the “old iteration”?
And the “original Big East” was an entity that didn’t even exist until 1995? What was the entity which called itself The Big East for 16 years before “the original Big East” came into existence?
I’m really trying to follow the logic here. We have 6 members who have been playing under the Big East banner continuously for for 43 years with the exception of our relatively brief hiatus (2013-20), but thus group is the “new Big East? And somehow a group of school which came and went over the years, sometimes as associate or football-only members are actually the “original Big East”?
I think I’ve got it now.
No, you’re stuck on how you think words and the law should work instead of the reality of the situation.You’re still stuck on the $100 mill as the only thing that mattered, ignoring the $35 mill in fees that they kept and ignoring the Big East name and the MSG tournament, both of which had tremendous value. It’s like a divorce in which one party gets cash but the other gets cash, an investment portfolio, the mansion on 10 acres, and the Rolls. And then the one with the cash thinks he got it all.
Even if you agree with all that, West Virginia was poached before the divorce. It was a member of the original Big East.There is a practical result and there are the technicalities of the bridge from the old Big East to the new Big East.
The Big East continued with larger share of its original members, its name, and the MSG contract.
It technically formed a new entity and transferred the name and the MSG contract, but that was just a mechanism.
I think the divorce analogy is a good one. The new Big East kept more of the value of assets (Name and MSG Contract), agreed to leave more cash with the AAC, and both sides agreed to the split with no further exit fees (which was a valued concession).
The Big East and the AAC formally agreed to share the records and the history of the original Big East.
The AAC contains no members of the Big East from its early years. The Big East has Georgetown, St John’s, UConn, Providence, Seton Hall, and Nova.
WVU was a 90s add. Not one of the first 9 from the 80s, and never a real fit to the conference. They did fill out the football schedule when that was important.Even if you agree with all that, West Virginia was poached before the divorce. It was a member of the original Big East.
So a member of the original BE, got it.WVU was a 90s add. Not one of the first 9 from the 80s, and never a real fit to the conference. They did fill out the football schedule when that was important.
The “original Big East” had 8 original members. The “new Big East” had 7 original members. West Virginia was part of the original Big East. They however were not an original member of the Big East.Some peopl seem to be having difficulty with the meaning of th word “original”, which derives from the word origins, or beginnings. For example, when we talk about the origins of the United States, we don’t include Alaska. We talk about “the original 13 colonies”. Even though the nation expanded to eventually include 37 other states, they are not considered as part of the original colonies.
The original Big East had 8 members, one of whom delayed beginning competition for a year due to obligations to another conference. If we want to expand a little bit to the “beginnings” of the conference, we could include Pitt because they began competition 3 years after the conference began.
That was the original Big East. It had no football, and didn’t begin competition in football until 12 years later. For the first 4 years of Big East Football, half of its football teams were associate members of the conference for football only. Two of those joined as full members of the Big East 4 years later. A third was invited to join the conference as a full member 5 years after that.
If there’s any doubt about whether the current Big East is some new entity, we can simply refer to the separation agreement at the time the C7 initiated the split from the football side of the conference in 2012-13. As part of that agreement it was resolved that 1979 would be recognized as the official starting date of both of the 2 now separate conferences which emerged out of this split. That’s the official record, which confirms the notion of a split, or a separation, of the 2 halves of the Big East. So, the current conference didn’t begin in 2013; it officially began in 1979.
Dude… let it go and move on.Some peopl seem to be having difficulty with the meaning of th word “original”, which derives from the word origins, or beginnings.
The thread will survive - It’s easier to put someone else to bed…seems like one out of every 40 posts is a tweet. Time to put this thread to bed mods
This is right. The “original BE” is not the same as “original members of the original BE”. The “new BE” is not the same as new members of the either iteration of the BE.The “original Big East” had 8 original members. The “new Big East” had 7 original members. West Virginia was part of the original Big East. They however were not an original member of the Big East.
Maybe it can be renamed same old newbie vs old BE argumentThe thread will survive - It’s easier to put someone else to bed…
I'm starting to partially agree with the split rather than the C7 leaving, but according to wikipedia, the C7 left the conference. The best part of the wikipedia post is the fact that it line 1.4 was created:Some peopl seem to be having difficulty with the meaning of th word “original”, which derives from the word origins, or beginnings. For example, when we talk about the origins of the United States, we don’t include Alaska. We talk about “the original 13 colonies”. Even though the nation expanded to eventually include 37 other states, they are not considered as part of the original colonies.
The original Big East had 8 members, one of whom delayed beginning competition for a year due to obligations to another conference. If we want to expand a little bit to the “beginnings” of the conference, we could include Pitt because they began competition 3 years after the conference began.
That was the original Big East. It had no football, and didn’t begin competition in football until 12 years later. For the first 4 years of Big East Football, half of its football teams were associate members of the conference for football only. Two of those joined as full members of the Big East 4 years later. A third was invited to join the conference as a full member 5 years after that.
If there’s any doubt about whether the current Big East is some new entity, we can simply refer to the separation agreement at the time the C7 initiated the split from the football side of the conference in 2012-13. As part of that agreement it was resolved that 1979 would be recognized as the official starting date of both of the 2 now separate conferences which emerged out of this split. That’s the official record, which confirms the notion of a split, or a separation, of the 2 halves of the Big East. So, the current conference didn’t begin in 2013; it officially began in 1979.
There was a company called General Motors founded in 1908. In 2008, there was a bankruptcy and the founding of a new entity also called General Motors in 2009. Assets from the old GM were transferred to the new GM.There was a conference called the Big East from 1979-2013, it had fluctuating membership. Some were original members like Georgetown and Providence, some were not original members like Pittsburgh and West Virginia. All were members of the original BE. In 2013, a new conference was formed with 10 members, only 4 of which were actually original members of the original BE. It has been deemed the New Big East.