Why is there such a discrepancy?
Edit: Between Palm and Lunardi.
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/ is my go-to. Yes, there is a lag, but being able to judge based on many predictions (and seeing where outliers are) is great data.Brad Evans, who has a better track record than Lunardi the past 5 years, has UConn as a 10 seed.
It's a tough year with the metrics & unbalanced schedules to know what will be valued most so just keep winning.
Lunardi updated. 3rd to last team in.
Quality losses, like the kind the SEC gets in football.8-12 Penn State moves ahead of us in NET?
Lunardi's projections seem way off this season. I can't make an argument for Indiana or Minnesota being on the bubble, or even UNC being in the 'Last 4 Byes' category.
Indiana is nearly .500, Minnesota is five games below .500 in-conference, and UNC hasn't beaten anyone.
That was different in that we were coming of a national championship, so had some respect.In 2012, we played in the 8-9 game and we hadn't beaten anyone all season.
Big 10 and ACC play on ESPN. That's your answer. They're pumping these teams up to get eyeballs for gamesLunardi's projections seem way off this season. I can't make an argument for Indiana or Minnesota being on the bubble, or even UNC being in the 'Last 4 Byes' category.
Indiana is nearly .500, Minnesota is five games below .500 in-conference, and UNC hasn't beaten anyone.
We beat Florida State, who was a 3 seed in the NCAAs. That's actually a real win.In 2012, we played in the 8-9 game and we hadn't beaten anyone all season.
We beat Florida State, who was a 3 seed in the NCAAs. That's actually a real win.
That team also had like 13 losses going into the tournament. Had more raw talent than this team (AO, Drummond, Bazz, Boat, Giffey, Roscoe, Daniels), but what a mess of a year....which is reasonably similar to our USC win this year. Hmmmmm.
Joe Lunardi's Bracketology has gone downhill, mirroring ESPN's decline in quality. Don't bother with it. If you want a more realistic bracket prediction, use Haslam Metrics.Lunardi's projections seem way off this season. I can't make an argument for Indiana or Minnesota being on the bubble, or even UNC being in the 'Last 4 Byes' category.
Indiana is nearly .500, Minnesota is five games below .500 in-conference, and UNC hasn't beaten anyone.
Gotta love quality losses. Imagine if you had 30 quality losses how highly you'd be rated!?!Quality losses, like the kind the SEC gets in football.
Need Michigan State to lose. But really they’ll throw the winner on the bubble because Big10.SUNDAY'S BUBBLE GAMES:
2 PM: Michigan State @ Maryland - CBS: Suddenly, this is a very interesting game. Both teams have precarious overall resumes but Michigan State has won their last three, two of which against Illinois and Iowa.
7 PM: Nevada @ Utah State- FS1: Once considered a strong tournament consideration, Utah State has lost four of their last seven including their most recent game against Nevada. A loss tonight should knock them out completely.
Side note, Nevada is a team to watch in 21-22: No major seniors graduating, Wichita State transfer Grant Sherfield has been a star in Reno and the team adds two top-50 transfers in Texas' Will Baker and Oregon's Addison Patterson.
So Cooley and Williams are idiots?
not everything is yes/no, sometimes smart people make poor decisions.