The fact that those same players were team players under Kemba's leadership, and cancer under Bazz's has to either reflect positively on Kemba or negatively on Bazz.
You put me in the very uncomfortable position of having to argue against Bazz. I think that Bazz is very close to being Kemba's equal. But he is in the unenviable position of needing to eclipse a legend to gain the top spot. He will never have the opportunity to lead the team to a post season 11 for 11. No one ever will.
I love Bazz. One of my all time favorite Huskies.
But Kemba put us on his back and carried us all the way to the promised land. Kemba is the stuff of legends as far a I am concerned and Bazz would have to do the same to be in his league. Just MHO.
AAC championship final 4 and we have a discussionHow far does Bazz have to take this team to reach Kemba status? Win it all? Final Four?
These stats are good for something I guess. The only one I care about is the W. Now I love Bazz and his loyalty is not to be minimized. But Kemba should have been POY and coming in second was close. So if Bazz wins the last 11 games of his college career I will anoint him the best! And it won't even take 11 just using that to compare.
Now you have it. I'm with youIf he wins the last one, he goes right to the top.
That's true, but that was also a late-season charge. They were really frustrating all year, in a 2012 kind of way.People really do forget how good KEA was...and I think part of that is that he got injured in a 5-12 matchup with Utah State. Had he been healthy...there was a very good chance of back-to-back final fours, as that bracket was destroyed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_N...l_Tournament#South_Regional_-_Austin.2C_Texas
Bazz isn't better than KEA. Not even close.
Not really sure where you're coming from here, Bazz is definitely better than KEA IMO.
Sort of a side note here, but I'm reminded of our tournament games in 2011 when the national commentators would say something to the effect of "Good move by Jim Calhoun here bringing in Shabazz Napier and letting Walker work without the ball." As if that wasn't what happened in every single game the entire year.
To say kea was more important is not valid. I mean , not only did Napier play a key role in a ring ; he's been steering us through these trecherous waters of realignment and irrelevance. He is also playing at the same level that walker was in 2011, we'll see if it ends that well though.
I guess I'm coming from the place that thinks KEA was better than Napier. Anyone who thinks that's denigrating Napier forgets how good El-Amin was. His last year they beat 2 teams that ended up as 1 seeds in the Big Dance. He outplayed Gibert Arenas head-to-head. He put the team on his shoulders like Bazz is doing and they were on the way to an FF before he got hurt.
People underestimate him. That team the year before he showed up was a third-placed NIT team. Now, there would obviously be some improvement because their best players were freshmen and sophomores, but let's not kid ourselves. As much as we love Ricky Moore, he wasn't a great primary point guard or vocal leader. El-Amin showed up, ran the show, and the team went 32-4 after going 18-15...and let's be honest, a 14-14 team doesn't make the NIT anymore, and certainly doesn't start with 3 home games (two against mid-majors) like that team did.Not valid? If Napier played a "key role" in a ring (which he did), how can you describe KEA's role? Key times three? I don't think "steering us through these trecherous waters of realignment and irrelevance" remotely compares to what Khalid accomplished. He moved this program from good to great. That's a huge leap. He was the leader of the teams he was on from his first school visit. He accomplished things that Ray Allen and Donyell Marshall couldn't do with more talented squads. Before KEA, UConn was a trivia question - "What team has been to the most NCAA's without making the Final Four?" He moved JC from a respected program builder that couldn't win the big one to Hall of Fame coach. As a freshman, he led a team that went toe-to-toe with a Vince Carter-Antione Jamison team coming up a bit short. As a sophmore, his team wins it all against Elton Brand and Shane Battier. UConn made it to the promised land on his shoulders. Of course he had plenty of help, but he was the straw that stirred the drink. That matters. He belongs on the Wall.
This debate has me wondering if age of the posters has anything to do with their preferences. I think KEA was an important player, but best PG???? He and Ricky complimented each other nicely, had a good jump shot, was pretty clutch, had a winning attitude and bigger testiculos than most any other player in UConn history. But, as a PG, I have him behind, Kemba, Bazz, Price, Williams, Ollie, Sheffer, and Chris Smith in some order.
Plus I still blame him for that silly shock the world comment. Uconn was ranked #1 for more weeks than Duke in 99. I'm not sure how beating them was shocking to anyone paying attention. An upset, sure they're Duke, but it was hardly shocking.