First off, this debate is fascinating - love watching people bring up ideas to support their particular choice and there are a lot of ideas to go around.
Second, can we possibly discuss great UConn players without being antagonistic to someone with a different view/perspective/opinion? After all, we're discussing great UConn players - debate at will, but have fun and realize how lucky we are to be in a position to have this debate. Imagine the debate of the best point guard ever on a Pitt, or PC or UMass board. Some of their best PG debate points might actually go back to being the fastest sperm in the womb.
Finally, it's really hard to compare Napier to KEA - they game has changed a huge amount in 15 years. On the one hand as money continues to increase in the NBA, more talent continues to pour into college basketball. On the other hand, 15 years ago, players stayed a lot longer. It's pretty unlike that Ray or Rip or maybe even Oak (who valued the degree) would play three years in today's game. I get those two ideas are juxtapositioned to each other, but they do change how the competition may be different. Napier is the best player on a team with a huge deficit (front court), KEA was the second best player on a team that had almost no weakness and arguably one of the best defensive UConn teams of all time.
One of the ways I like to think about it is if you could put Napier as a senior on the 99 team in place of KEA, would they have been as successful? I think not - they needed the intangible moxie KEA brought that Napier will never have. If you put KEA as a soph on this team, would they be as successful? Again, I think not as he would have been too young - even with the moxie to be the leader Napier has become.
They both just happen to be the best piece you could fit into the puzzle at the time.
In the end, if you have to rank them in some order, I can't until this season is complete. If we go elite 8 or beyond with Napier pulling the rest of the sled from the front (afterall, they are Huskies), he could surpass KEA. If he can't motivate them to get out of their own way in the first round, I think KEA gets my nod. But other things could happen along the way. I reserve judgement.