ThisJustIn
Queen of Queens
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,087
- Reaction Score
- 11,124
No, it's shoving.So shoving isn't fighting?
No, it's shoving.So shoving isn't fighting?
she should have kept her big mouth shut if she didn't know the rule for sure
So shoving isn't fighting?
Indeed and it seemed contagious....and a profound lack of good sense.
So shoving isn't fighting?
It is the nature of tweets. But, she wouldn't have had to tweet anything if the Baylor players had stayed on the bench where they belonged.she should have kept her big mouth shut if she didn't know the rule for sure
What makes no sense here is that there WAS a fight, and the players DID get involved.. not by fighting, but they were involved none the less
Actually the rule in the men's game is the same as the women's game. If there is a "fight" and the players leave the bench, then they are ejected and suspended.
I'm guessing the officials ruled that there wasn't a fight, thus the Baylor players leaving the bench were just ejected.
It will be interesting to see what the NCAA Rules Interpreter says about it because I'm sure they'll have the final word, not these three officials.
You want whining? Check out sally Jenkins on twitter complaining about how the officials ruined the game.I'm just glad the game is over so I dont have to see Mulkey whining the entire game.
The Baylor players who left the bench were clearly peace-keepers, not antagonists.
Thus was particularly obvious with Griner -- who learned her lesson about throwing punches two years ago.
I think the refs used good judgment.
Anyone know if the Summitt is still standing?
How can anyone claim to know the rule about suspensions when they have no idea what the rule is? Lobo didn't know the rule and tweeted. I hope ESPN suspends HER for shoddy reporting.
A bunch of wishful thinking by fans who don't want to have to see Griner in the Final Four.
Art. 8. Bench personnel leaving the bench area when a fight may break out or has broken out. The head coach may leave the bench area in this case to prevent the situation from escalating.
PENALTY:
(Art. 8) Flagrant 2 technical fouls. Two free throws shall be awarded to any player on the offended team, unless double fouls are assessed. For double flagrant fouls, no free throws are awarded. For any flagrant 2 technical foul, the ball shall be awarded to the offended team at the point of interruption.
When anyone other than the head coach leaves the bench and enters the playing court but does not participate in the fight, only one technical foul shall be assessed regardless of the number of offenders. This one foul is charged indirectly to the head coach. For any single flagrant 2 technical foul, the ball shall be awarded to the offended team at the point of interruption. When a single flagrant 2 technical foul occurs during intermission for the second or extra period, play shall resume with a throw-in to the offended team on either side of midcourt. This flagrant 2 technical foul applies toward the team-foul total, and the offender(s) shall be ejected but not subjected to suspension.
How can anyone claim to know the rule about suspensions when they have no idea what the rule is? Lobo didn't know the rule and tweeted. I hope ESPN suspends HER for shoddy reporting.
2-3 deep breaths.... ice on the back of the neck or an icey cold coke under the arm pit EastTexas
How can anyone claim to know the rule about suspensions when they have no idea what the rule is? Lobo didn't know the rule and tweeted. I hope ESPN suspends HER for shoddy reporting.
A bunch of wishful thinking by fans who don't want to have to face Griner in the Final Four.