ThisJustIn
Queen of Queens
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,087
- Reaction Score
- 11,124
Those who laugh don't need any reasonsIt is crap like this that gives ppl who are not fans of WCBB a reason to laugh at!!! In the men's game it is a suspension.
Those who laugh don't need any reasonsIt is crap like this that gives ppl who are not fans of WCBB a reason to laugh at!!! In the men's game it is a suspension.
Maybe they mean that the rules could possibly be "bent" for a star player. Don't know if that's what the user meant, but if that is the case then it is BS.Not following that. The only reason the rule exists in the men's game is because too many times, players leaving the bench resulted in brawls. Basically, you're acknowleding women have more restraint and less testosterone.
It could happen. But would other teams really want to win a championship because Baylor players get suspended? Griner was obviously just trying to calm things down, but that may not matter to the NCAA.
Total BS.
Didn't look like a swing, more like a pant grab to pull herself up
Not following that. The only reason the rule exists in the men's game is because too many times, players leaving the bench resulted in brawls. Basically, you're acknowleding women have more restraint and less testosterone.
Are you serious? Of course other teams would want to win a championship no matter how it comes. You play with what you got. The players made the choice to leave the bench, whether to play peacekeeper or join the fray. And the if the rules state that if you leave the bench you get suspended, that is how it should be called. There has to be order. Three refs against 10 players is a challenge. Three refs against 30 players would be impossible. The more people involved, the more likely things will continue to escalate.It could happen. But would other teams really want to win a championship because Baylor players get suspended? Griner was obviously just trying to calm things down, but that may not matter to the NCAA.
Yeah, but it was all Kumbayah at the end there wasn't it?
Rebecca:
No automatic suspension unless there was a fight and bench players got involved. GRINER AND COMPANY WILL PLAY NEXT GAME!!
I do not agree. I think it is passion for the game and the need to win that fuels these athletes. Women have just as much or even more for the game than men. Agree that women have more restraint but why have a rule just for men and not for women?!
Actually Lobo amended her tweet.
"Wow -- I thought it included ejection next game. Studio will have the exact ruling. Stay tuned..."
What makes no sense here is that there WAS a fight, and the players DID get involved.. not by fighting, but they were involved none the less
she should have kept her big mouth shut if she didn't know the rule for sure
I saw no fight, I saw feistiness, mouthiness and a profound lack of good sense.What makes no sense here is that there WAS a fight, and the players DID get involved.. not by fighting, but they were involved none the less
No, it was not a fight. There were no swings. No contact.
she should have kept her big mouth shut if she didn't know the rule for sure