- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 50,844
- Reaction Score
- 181,011
@HuskyHawk, this is what I'm talking about.So silly, the openupasaurus isn't going to answer questions and will keep restating the narrow facts case or attack an analogy and play the blame game vs discussing the actual situation, pursuing a viable solution.
There are 4 basic flawed theories and talking points that the open up crowd clings to:
1. We cannot contain the virus. Even though protection works, social distancing works and other countries have done RIDICULOUSLY better than the USA, the other dumbfnations are cited as proof that the Virus is Dion Waiters pre-playoffs, you can never stop it, only hope to contain it.
2. Virus only or mostly or predominately effects older people & sick people- problem is this is then framed as if older people sign up for virus Kool Aid so that younger people go on about their day. Problem solved! No one is doing this, no one is testing this and this never was and never will be the case. It is not an option so citing it as an excuse to partially open is Ostrich level behavior. Also, generally speaking isn't it a virtue to PROTECT OUR MOST VULNERABLE?!
3. Herd Immunity: This sounds good to all of us, but there are NEVER specifics, no country has achieved this (best is exponential spread flattens) and it harkens grimly back to #2, by definition herd immunity benefits the strongest and the herd is continually culled.
4. The economic damage > sickness & death & try to avoid citing massive public health crisis and maybe just maybe FOCUSING ON THAT RESPONSE FIRST!!: "I've seen the needle and the damage done, a little part of it in everyone." I've no idea how the stock market is still as high as it is, but there are going to be long term economic consequences and continually re-opening without a plan makes it worse and worse and worse. This argument boils down to combating losses by gambling on exponentially increasingly uncertain outcomes.