Yes, that was my question on another thread: So, let's be optimistic and say UConn does land three of its four targets. For argument sake, let's say it's the law firm of Boston & Horston plus Griffin. What impact does that have on the Huskies recruiting top prospects such as Bueckers, Van Lith and Brink the following season? I've heard that good players want to play with good players but can there be too much of a good thing?OK. So now the nervous nellies can worry that her commitment will deter others?
As for me, HOORAY!!!!
Yes, that was my question on another thread: So, let's be optimistic and say UConn does land three of its four targets. For argument sake, let's say it's the law firm of Boston & Horston plus Griffin. What impact does that have on the Huskies recruiting top prospects such as Bueckers, Van Lith and Brink the following season? I've heard that good players want to play with good players but can there be too much of a good thing?
--Still Nervous Golden

I'm betting you'll still find something to complain about...frankly I'll be happy if they land even one of the remaining three prospects..

I'm betting you'll still find something to complain about.![]()

Only if those "good" players see themselves as the center of the universe. From what I have seen and read about UConn's 2019/2020 targets this is not the case. On the contrary, from what I saw of the U17 tourney the opposite is the case.

Now let's see if some of the other recruits on UConn's radar follow suit, and fall in line. 
Think of it this way, The games would be a whole lot more interesting if all the good players didn't end up on 3 or 4 teams. WBB will be a whole lot better when the talent gets spread out.

If parity is the goal then you are right. Me, I want to watch perfectly beautiful teamwork and don't really care about the score. (As long as UConn wins) When I look at the 2019-2001 classes I see a potential golden age at CT. Let everyone else cheer on their football teams.![]()

Safest bet ever. When I used to take bets for a local numbers runner, we would call that a lock.I'm betting you'll still find something to complain about.![]()

Geno clearly ain't retiring soon.

Someone tell her that the proper way to refer to her runner-up is "that school in Kentucky"
Good get for the Huskies obviously. Hopefully, this will allow some folks to take a step away from the proverbial ledge.
Because women bball players usually dont leave school early there are 96 McDonald's AA in college all the time. If the top 10 programs took 6 each that still leaves 36 more. As far as players not wanting to go to a school loaded with talent no top 10 player should ever worry that they cant get on the court. If they get there and find poor chemistry they transfer. Even in the best situation players play 30 out of 40 minutes unless the game is really close and if you are at a top school getting 20 to 25 minutes a game it probably means your team has enough depth to A carry you far, and B make you work hard in practice which makes you better. You have a lot more practices then games which is were the work is put in to improve though game time makes you better in other waysThink of it this way, The games would be a whole lot more interesting if all the good players didn't end up on 3 or 4 teams. WBB will be a whole lot better when the talent gets spread out.