It is a tricky thing, jscott - on one hand, you are talking about somebody who has a major health issue, and has it far, far too early in her lifetime. And, you are talking about somebody who is the winningest coach in college basketball, and literally set the standard for women's college basketball.
On the other hand, most of what we are referring to here predates her diagnosis by several years. So, you have two questions to factor in - first, to what extent did Pat's oncoming dementia affect her statements and decision-making that far ahead of the recognition of her illness? Second, to what extent does one excuse the litany of disagreeableness she engendered, based upon her subsequent diagnosis - or, put simply, how big and how far back do you pardon Pat Summitt and Tennessee? Because, as has been noted, there were no shortage of individuals and institutions - including the SEC conference - that "aided and abetted" the underhanded innuendo and assault on the UConn staff, program, and school.
Count me among the group that do not issue a blanket pardon. Some forgiveness, or at least understanding, of what went on the last couple of years of Pat's tenure, sure. Having a father going through a similar situation, as so many of us do, hindsight allows me to see that things were starting to slip at least two years before my dad was obviously in distress. But, that doesn't negate all the good/not so good things he may have thought, said, or done for an indeterminate number of years before. Where do you draw the line? I don't know. But, it's too easy and somewhat condescending, to just say that nothing Pat said, did, or achieved for the last several years of her career, really counts. Her wins count, her championships count, all the good things she did count - and, so do her failures.