- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 4,794
- Reaction Score
- 14,813
Still waiting for a single CT journalist to report on whether uconn was trying to negotiate their way in via a Cal or Stanford style cut.
Unless they invite us......![]()
Oh, I will still hate them all even if we ended up in a conference with them.Unless they invite us......![]()
And every nickel will be eaten up by travel and then some. Sheer desperation by the ACC, with no added value. Once again, DFW does not care about SMU football and never has.SMU is going to be making more for the next 7 years than they do in the AAC, even when they take zero media dollars. They will still get NCAA and CFP payouts, and other payouts which equal more than the AAC total with media. They will actually make even more because the games will have higher attendance and being in a better conference increases revenue in itself. They need less donors in the ACC even when they get zero media money than they do in the AAC.
True, but I have to imagine ESPN is loving this. The moves contribute to the dissolution of the conference and that horrid contract ESPN is locked into until 2036. Worst case scenario for ESPN is that they keep many of these properties in the SEC and B12, while unloading the minnows of the ACC into a smaller contractESPN got nothing on the cheap and really had no say - their contract specifies that they pay X for new members.
I was totally kidding. We are dead. But at least we get to play Seton Hall.Forget the cash. SMU knows it will benefit yuge just by playing an ACC schedule vs AAC.
I can't be the only one tired of billyboy telling us we are absolute dog poop worth nothing can I?UConn didn't have the wiggliest worm for bait...
No huge addition of households like Texas and California for ACCN carriage fee boost...(already have New York).
Add in offers to not take any media money for seven years or to play for a only a 30% distribution.
It was a good deal for the ACC....more money for half a decade or more, the ACC shored up in case several teams leave...there were rumors that ESPN floated the bogeyman of invoking the composition clause and cutting monies if the conference fell below 15.
The ACC will be there...it is about survival in a dog eat Pac 12 world.
I was totally kidding. We are dead. But at least we get to play Seton Hall.
Wrong, The ACC will now be receiving extra money to appease their top teams, so they win. ESPN wins by maintaining control over college football and ensuring the PAC will no longer be a power conference, they like playing God.Sheer desperation by the ACC, with no added value.
Let them rub our noses in it. They can fill their trophy cases with TV money and "power" status. We'll fill ours with national championships.I can't be the only one tired of billyboy telling us we are absolute dog poop worth nothing can I?
Well, no amount of money would actually "appease" those teams, and as @upstater points out, their three top teams opposed this move. To me that means that the bulk of us money isn't going to them, but we will see.Wrong, The ACC will now be receiving extra money to appease their top teams, so they win. ESPN wins by maintaining control over college football, they like playing God.
Well, no amount of money would actually "appease" those teams, and as @upstater points out, their three top teams opposed this move. To me that means that the bulk of us money isn't going to them, but we will see.
Yeah this was all aside from the top 3, saying "you want more money? Here is more money, you can have it at the expense of new teams, not ours, and oh by the way we are taking our share of that more money as well!"Well, no amount of money would actually "appease" those teams, and as @upstater points out, their three top teams opposed this move. To me that means that the bulk of us money isn't going to them, but we will see.
Let them rub our noses in it. They can fill their trophy cases with TV money and "power" status. We'll fill ours with national championships.
We can all be tired of it, but he is usually correct.I can't be the only one tired of billyboy telling us we are absolute dog poop worth nothing can I?
Eh, he is always crying that FSU should be getting more money. If that were true, they would be. Just like our predicament.We can all be tired of it, but he is usually correct.
We've been doing it on "the little money" for more than a decade. How long are we supposed to wait for all that power conference money to result in our demise? In the long run we're all dead anyway.Lol.. do you really believe this? It takes money to hire big time coaches. How do you plan to do this with the little money we get from the Big East media deal?
I can't be the only one tired of billyboy telling us we are absolute dog poop worth nothing can I?
this sets such a bad precedentNext....
![]()
ACC adds Stanford, Cal, SMU beginning 2024-25
The ACC presidents and chancellors voted to add three schools -- Stanford, Cal and SMU -- beginning in the 2024-25 school year. It will bring the ACC to 18 members, with 17 playing football full time in the conference.www.espn.com
I think it has to do with votes.The hold up was probably the top teams demanding all of the new money.
Wrong. Apple is going to pay the Big East 20 mil per school next contract. If not more.