ACC, Big Ten...you've chosen poorly | Page 2 | The Boneyard

ACC, Big Ten...you've chosen poorly

Status
Not open for further replies.
I simply don't get the choices. They are strategic blunders of epic purportiona.

Swofford is a Fool. He thought BC from the Flutie & SU\Pitt Brand carries you going forward. They guarantee nothing. RUTGERS is the complete Mess we always knew. They won't change.

Addition should be the CAPACITY to build a Brand Bigtime competitive Program for the Longterm. For the eyebaalls. Only Jurich has impressed me.

UConn - MBB & WBB & Soccer & Baseball & Ice Hockey - are major builds. I think you should see FB with Edsall & Diaco as something we can do.

Day looper - could care less about you grabbing NJ kids & that should be - .009% consideration in this.

I think Rutgers has the potential to become something. If nothing else their addition helps the B1G with recruiting and eyeballs. The program is a mess, but Rutgers still offers something.

BC on the other hand offers nothing. They used to be relevant back when they were in the Big East. Now, nobody cares about BC.
BC isn't just on an island, it's on an uninhabited island.
 
I think you are confusing UCONN's football attendance with Rutgers. Why bring up attendance when UCONN isn't even out of the 20's?

Sorry, not going to work if you're pointing out football attendance, where RU was 9th out of 14 in the Big Ten.

2015 Season
Rutgers attendance - 47,723
UCONN attendance - 28,224

Also, Rutgers basketball averaged 5,770 last year, in the last full year stats were available.....a few more than 1,000 but I know none of this sports your anti-Rutgers narrative.
Hey A s s h a t...welcome back...before you even type the word attendance in a thread on our board you should make sure you take a remedial math class. Why...you can't even read numbers properly you :
I seem to remember you denying RU EVER had a game where attendance was 500...you were wrong..it was SUB-500 for 2 games!
Attendance is in bold!
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013–14_Rutgers_Scarlet_Knights_men's_basketball_team)

11/25/2013*
7:30 pm Stillman College
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round W 116–89 4–3
The RAC (392)
Piscataway, NJ
11/26/2013*
7:30 pm Fairleigh Dickinson
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round L 72–73 4–4
The RAC (466)
Piscataway, NJ

You also stated RU has a stand alone football facility...you conveniently forgot the word INDOOR...why because RU doesn't have one!
Here is the link to UConn's in case you want to know what one looks like you tool:
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/school-bio/strength-conditioning-shenkman.html
I suggest at some point you answer this..or stop posting on our board!
 
What would Rutgers' attendance would look like if your home slate was filled with the likes of Tulane, SMU, etc? Probably somewhere around 30k.

Maybe Ash will be successful but if he's not, let's see what happens to High Point attendance after Illinois, Indiana, Purdue have come through a few times.
Jungle don't waste your energy responding to this ....he comes here and runs his mouth yet when called on his Bulls**t he ignores it. He's a class A turd who needs to be put on the banned list by @Pudge.
 
I'm OCD about not all-capping UConn.
I am the opposite. It is UCONN.
Back in the day it was always UConn. Then they started saying Connecticut and I got used to it. I actually prefer Connecticut. But now the brand is UCONN, so be it.
 
Business.....conferences will continue to run their business like a company with a large market share. Monopolize the market while strangling the competition.

The movement to P5 was in this vein.

Now the question is, at this point, if a P5 conference can be strangled. It is not all about money either...

It will play out in 10 years.
Most on this board get that it is about markets, but what market did the ACC monopolize? Not NYC, that is for sure. And they lost Baltimore/DC in the process. It was right there for the ACC to be THE conference. As Pudge mentioned, had they grabbed RU and UConn along with Cuse they would have owned NYC as much as any conference could have. Instead, their NY team is 250 miles away from NYC (to put it in perspective, BC is closer to NYC than Syracuse is), they allowed the B1G to drop their anchor in the shadows of the Empire State building too. The decisions the ACC made are the type that eventually end up putting businesses out of business.
 
.-.
Most on this board get that it is about markets, but what market did the ACC monopolize? Not NYC, that is for sure. And they lost Baltimore/DC in the process. It was right there for the ACC to be THE conference. As Pudge mentioned, had they grabbed RU and UConn along with Cuse they would have owned NYC as much as any conference could have. Instead, their NY team is 250 miles away from NYC (to put it in perspective, BC is closer to NYC than Syracuse is), they allowed the B1G to drop their anchor in the shadows of the Empire State building too. The decisions the ACC made are the type that eventually end up putting businesses out of business.
Add in the deal they have with ND and they would have owned NYC. And had every major tv market on the east coast covered....
 
Hey A s s h a t...welcome back...before you even type the word attendance in a thread on our board you should make sure you take a remedial math class. Why...you can't even read numbers properly you :
I seem to remember you denying RU EVER had a game where attendance was 500...you were wrong..it was SUB-500 for 2 games!
Attendance is in bold!
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013–14_Rutgers_Scarlet_Knights_men's_basketball_team)

11/25/2013*
7:30 pm Stillman College
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round W 116–89 4–3
The RAC (392)
Piscataway, NJ
11/26/2013*
7:30 pm Fairleigh Dickinson
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round L 72–73 4–4
The RAC (466)
Piscataway, NJ

You also stated RU has a stand alone football facility...you conveniently forgot the word INDOOR...why because RU doesn't have one!
Here is the link to UConn's in case you want to know what one looks like you tool:
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/school-bio/strength-conditioning-shenkman.html
I suggest at some point you answer this..or stop posting on our board!

If mainlinedave went to Rutgers, it would seem that Rutgers chose poorly.
 
I am the opposite. It is UCONN.
Back in the day it was always UConn. Then they started saying Connecticut and I got used to it. I actually prefer Connecticut. But now the brand is UCONN, so be it.
The all caps is for the wordmark logo, like what is on the jerseys. When people, mainly newspaper reporters and bloggers (sports, academics, research, culture...), are writing in print or online they're supposed to use UConn.

That may not apply to the boneyard but as an alum I'm just trying to do what Susan wants to be consistent.
 
I get the shots at BC, but not RU. Taking RU and UMd was a nice move by the BIG to cut a line thru the ACC, certainly better than Swofford taking Ky Comm College from the B12. Besides, all the arguing about RU to the BIG makes zero sense when we need them to lead the BIG to us.
 
Most on this board get that it is about markets, but what market did the ACC monopolize? Not NYC, that is for sure. And they lost Baltimore/DC in the process. It was right there for the ACC to be THE conference. As Pudge mentioned, had they grabbed RU and UConn along with Cuse they would have owned NYC as much as any conference could have. Instead, their NY team is 250 miles away from NYC (to put it in perspective, BC is closer to NYC than Syracuse is), they allowed the B1G to drop their anchor in the shadows of the Empire State building too. The decisions the ACC made are the type that eventually end up putting businesses out of business.


The ACC is present and gets viewership in many nationwide markets...for instance, FSU is in tiny Tallahassee DMA...yet is watched enough to be the 2nd most watched team in 2014 (Bama #1). NC State brought more viewers than Penn state or Wisconsin (2014)

Who makes a living on New York college football viewing? Rutgers? (#54) Cuse? (#51)..
 
.-.
The all caps is for the wordmark logo, like what is on the jerseys. When people, mainly newspaper reporters and bloggers (sports, academics, research, culture...), are writing in print or online they're supposed to use UConn.

That may not apply to the boneyard but as an alum I'm just trying to do what Susan wants to be consistent.
INTERESTING. I think I need to change my habit.
 
Hey A s s h a t...welcome back...before you even type the word attendance in a thread on our board you should make sure you take a remedial math class. Why...you can't even read numbers properly you :
I seem to remember you denying RU EVER had a game where attendance was 500...you were wrong..it was SUB-500 for 2 games!
Attendance is in bold!
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013–14_Rutgers_Scarlet_Knights_men's_basketball_team)

11/25/2013*
7:30 pm Stillman College
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round W 116–89 4–3
The RAC (392)
Piscataway, NJ
11/26/2013*
7:30 pm Fairleigh Dickinson
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round L 72–73 4–4
The RAC (466)
Piscataway, NJ

You also stated RU has a stand alone football facility...you conveniently forgot the word INDOOR...why because RU doesn't have one!
Here is the link to UConn's in case you want to know what one looks like you tool:
http://www.uconnhuskies.com/school-bio/strength-conditioning-shenkman.html
I suggest at some point you answer this..or stop posting on our board!



Actually, you were the one that forgot "Indoor" you toolbag....not me. And the Bubble is Indoor last time I checked, Einstein.
And regarding attendance, our football team averages 48 thousand to your 28 thousand.

28 thousand is pathetic. PATHETIC. The Big ten laughs at that. RU gets nearly that much for our Spring game lol.

Thats what you AVERAGE. So weak, and you think the Big Ten would be serious about you?
 
Most on this board get that it is about markets, but what market did the ACC monopolize? Not NYC, that is for sure. And they lost Baltimore/DC in the process. It was right there for the ACC to be THE conference. As Pudge mentioned, had they grabbed RU and UConn along with Cuse they would have owned NYC as much as any conference could have. Instead, their NY team is 250 miles away from NYC (to put it in perspective, BC is closer to NYC than Syracuse is), they allowed the B1G to drop their anchor in the shadows of the Empire State building too. The decisions the ACC made are the type that eventually end up putting businesses out of business.

I think that Maryland would have left the ACC and Rutgers was always going to join the Big Ten no matter what Swofford did.
 
Actually, you were the one that forgot "Indoor" you toolbag....not me. And the Bubble is Indoor last time I checked, Einstein.
And regarding attendance, our football team averages 48 thousand to your 28 thousand.

28 thousand is pathetic. PATHETIC. The Big ten laughs at that. RU gets nearly that much for our Spring game lol.

Thats what you AVERAGE. So weak, and you think the Big Ten would be serious about you?
Just to refresh your memory I'll put uno my original post and your response...enough said:

When I think of Rutgers..I think of a D-1 athletic program that had 500 people at a men's basketball game...I think of a D-1 men's and women's basketball programs that play in a facility that wouldn't even qualify in the top 1/3 hs facilities in the state of NJ....I think of a D-1 athletic program that doesn't even have a stand alone indoor football practice facility....when I think of RU I think of Julie Herman, Mike Rice and a complete and utter embarrassment the athletic program is to the alumni of the school. Still want to talk now you a s s h a t ?

We do have a stand alone football practice facility, so that is wrong. The RAC not ranking in the top 1/3 of hs facilities is also obviously wrong.

The 500 people figure at the basketball game was proven false many times.but not surprised you wouldn't be smart enough to know that, based on the rest of the false statements you made.

An really, is there much difference than UCONN having like 4000 fans at one of your football games two years ago?

A bubble doesn't count..it isn't a year around indoor football facility!
And as for your claim on hoops attendance...well yeah time for remedial basic number reading there sport! Official attendance doesn't lie:
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013–14_Rutgers_Scarlet_Knights_men's_basketball_team)

11/25/2013*
7:30 pm Stillman College
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round W 116–89 4–3
The RAC (392)
Piscataway, NJ
11/26/2013*
7:30 pm Fairleigh Dickinson
NIT Season Tip-Off Consolation Round L 72–73 4–4
The RAC (466)
Piscataway, NJ

Who's the tool now ..A s s h a t!
 
.-.
Actually, you were the one that forgot "Indoor" you toolbag....not me. And the Bubble is Indoor last time I checked, Einstein.
And regarding attendance, our football team averages 48 thousand to your 28 thousand.

28 thousand is pathetic. PATHETIC. The Big ten laughs at that. RU gets nearly that much for our Spring game lol.

Thats what you AVERAGE. So weak, and you think the Big Ten would be serious about you?

Well you told us! But why is the Ol High and Mighty subjugating himself to the ol so lowly. You shame yourself by mingling with us peasants. Take yourself back to that powerful board Rutro. Your subjects there are waiting for you.
 
28 thousand is pathetic. PATHETIC. The Big ten laughs at that.

Perhaps, but the nation laughs at Rutgers, and has for years. But tradition is big in sports, so at least you have that going for you.
 
I think you are confusing UCONN's football attendance with Rutgers. Why bring up attendance when UCONN isn't even out of the 20's?

Sorry, not going to work if you're pointing out football attendance, where RU was 9th out of 14 in the Big Ten.

2015 Season
Rutgers attendance - 47,723
UCONN attendance - 28,224

Also, Rutgers basketball averaged 5,770 last year, in the last full year stats were available.....a few more than 1,000 but I know none of this sports your anti-Rutgers narrative.
Dave,
Seton Hall had a better AD than you, but they don't play football. Your the Clampetts, Dave. You have a sh!thouse of an AD that sat on a pile of oil.
 
Mainline, did you really come here to trumpet the fact that a B1G schedule draws more than an AAC one? Like this is some sort of revelation? If we traded schedules, how do you think that would go?
 
The recruiting thing doesn't even apply to UNJ.

The big10 was already recruiting there with ease. You can make that argument about how the AAC was constructed - recruiting, and it would fit, because that is what actually happened, but the University of New Jersey to the big 10 was about one thing, and one only.

It does to a degree. Admitting Rutgers now allows other B1G programs to score with recruits by telling them that they can play in front of Mom, Dad & friends on a regular basis in addition to Penn St and Maryland road games, which are about a 3 to 4 hour drive away from most of the state.
 
.-.
I am enjoying Rutgers in the Big10 very much so. Without them, we might not have gotten Jabrill Peppers and the slew of Jersey kids we are getting this year, hopefully including the #1 player Rashan Gary.

Having Rutgers in the Big10 and being, well Rutgers has allowed Michigan to gain inroads into the talent rich state. They screwed up when they didn't hire Jersey native Chris Partridge as a coach allowing Michigan to scoop him up. He has been a boon for us and Jersey recruiting. Nice never having to worry about the home town team in a talent rich state.
This. This, along with televisions, is why people who still to this day go "HURR WHAT HAS RUTGERS DONE TO DESERVE A P5 INVITE" look straight ignorant. It was never about Rutgers athletics. It was about New Jersey, Philly, and NY.
 
If mainlinedave went to Rutgers, it would seem that Rutgers chose poorly.

With the name 'MainLineDave' I was thinking he was a Philadelphia area kid who could not get into Penn St (this pure hatred for that school) and went to Rutgers instead. He said; but, of course, all his answers are suspect. Based on his continued dabbles, no way he could have gotten into Rutgers either (unless as their AD or basketball coach), I'm thinking we went to Rutger-Camden or maybe Rowan.
 
true but i was talking in terms of money, those funds from the late 1800s are not helping
It ain't the birthplace of college football. Revisionist history by Princeton and they dragged you along. First game was McGill vs Harvard in 1874, then Harvard vs Tufts in 1875 and then Harvard vs Yale in 1875. Thank you for complimenting what a great game football is, though. Just get us into the Big Ten and we'll help strip you of that title. :D
 
Reminds me of Indiana Jones
I wish this whole thread was flipped around and that they had chosen wisely. My blood pressure would be a lot lower (until it's game day for MBB or FB).

You-Have-Chosen-Wisely.jpg
 
Gotta love the strength of UConn Nation this weekend. 6400 for hockey against UVM on Friday night with a puck drop of 8:30pm. The next day, in a blizzard no less, a sellout for a Noon tipoff against Georgetown. Both had good atmospheres. Neither BC or RU can or would do that.

No question whatsoever that with a B1G schedule and competitive record (as we are approaching now), football wouldn't sell out and we can expand the Rent to the 55-60K range that it was designed to hold when first built.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,341
Messages
4,565,891
Members
10,467
Latest member
Eil Rule


Top Bottom