ACC Big East merger | Page 17 | The Boneyard

ACC Big East merger

One thing missing in this discussion is that Notre Dame receives a full share of ACC Network profits, just like every other ACC member.

ND gets a partial share of the regular, base contract ACC/ESPN money, but the total number is enhanced by the full share ACC Network money.

The latest EADA filing shows that ND received around $24 million total from the ACC, representing in the whole about a half share.

ND gets no ACC money for football, unless it makes a minor bowl and that money is pooled and shared

That ACC payout of $24 million is in addition to the $50 million a year from NBC and ND's playoff money.
Thanks for clarifying - I suspected no one on here had all the components of ND's revenue correctly portrayed.
 
Thanks for clarifying - I suspected no one on here had all the components of ND's revenue correctly portrayed.
That's a lot of words to use to say that you were wrong...

(Look at Fishy's numbers and tell me how they differ, please)
 
That's a lot of words to use to say that you were wrong...

(Look at Fishy's numbers and tell me how they differ, please)
Sorry, not following you... Can you dig out where Fishy showed what Terry D did? TIA!
 
Sorry, not following you... Can you dig out where Fishy showed what Terry D did? TIA!
His "amazing double dip" post that had all three revenue numbers. And it should have saved us a lot of time in this thread...
 
I see where this is going. it was a typo. AAC.
16 basketball & 8 football
24 basketball & 15 football

Basketball Only
SJU
PC
Nova
SHU
Georgetown
Marquette
DePaul
Creighton
Butler
Xavier

Football & Basketball
UConn
Temple
USF
Memphis
ECU
Tulane

Football Only
Army
Navy

Uncertain
Wichita State
Charlotte
Rice
Tulsa
FAU
UAB
UNT
UTSA
 
Football & Basketball
UConn
Temple
USF
Memphis
ECU
Tulane
Mate, no, please no...Those are the same jabroni schools the uni decided they had to dissociate from. Going back would trigger the nightmares I've had where I return to one of my former companies knowing they are d00m3d (which is why I left in the first place). I'd take the PAC instead and have it stand for "Pacific And Connecticut". Man I need a drink now...
 
One thing missing in this discussion is that Notre Dame receives a full share of ACC Network profits, just like every other ACC member.

ND gets a partial share of the regular, base contract ACC/ESPN money, but the total number is enhanced by the full share ACC Network money.

The latest EADA filing shows that ND received around $24 million total from the ACC, representing in the whole about a half share.

ND gets no ACC money for football, unless it makes a minor bowl and that money is pooled and shared

That ACC payout of $24 million is in addition to the $50 million a year from NBC and ND's playoff money.
Can you give us a rough breakout of what that 24 million is for? How much is is for their full share of the ACC network? Does Notre Dame's share of CFP money come through the conference or to them directly?
 
Mate, no, please no...Those are the same jabroni schools the uni decided they had to dissociate from. Going back would trigger the nightmares I've had where I return to one of my former companies knowing they are d00m3d (which is why I left in the first place). I'd take the PAC instead and have it stand for "Pacific And Connecticut". Man I need a drink now...
I'm joking around of course. But the difference is we'd still play basketball in the Big East. UConn was screwed because the basketball conference was not good and too far flung. It's not bad football competition when you include Army & Navy and with only 8 football teams, plenty of slots for bigger games.
 
I'm joking around of course. But the difference is we'd still play basketball in the Big East. UConn was screwed because the basketball conference was not good and too far flung. It's not bad football competition when you include Army & Navy and with only 8 football teams, plenty of slots for bigger games.
Actually, given that it appears that neither a Big 12 or ACC invite will not happen, it may be a good idea. Placates the basketball only crowd and give football fans a conference.
 
Actually, given that it appears that neither a Big 12 or ACC invite will not happen, it may be a good idea. Placates the basketball only crowd and give football fans a conference.
churlish.gif
 
Actually, given that it appears that neither a Big 12 or ACC invite will not happen, it may be a good idea. Placates the basketball only crowd and give football fans a conference.
If neither a big 12 invite or an ACC invite will not happen, that mean that they both will happen?
Confused Rooster Teeth GIF by Achievement Hunter
 
If neither a big 12 invite or an ACC invite will not happen, that mean that they both will happen?
Confused Rooster Teeth GIF by Achievement Hunter
Yes, it means that it will not happen, neither will it be both.
 
Yes, it means that it will not happen, neither will it be both.
Actually, if neither won't happen, that means that both will happen.
John Lewis Lol GIF by Waitrose & Partners
 
Actually, if neither won't happen, that means that both will happen.
John Lewis Lol GIF by Waitrose & Partners
I got you, I was just trying to mimic the incoherent Yard vernacular
 




A merger does shuffle the deck for the ACC, which it badly needs, since right now it has a losing hand relative to the P2. Keeping the revenue segregated for now between the two leagues would enable this to be a low cost event for the ACC, but it would open the ACC to big new markets which its earlier Big East additions (Pitt, Syracuse, BCU) never delivered. The Big East schools have proven they can hang in hoops, and adding creating a strong network of schools in the north and east makes its existing schools more valuable. UConn, Villanova, Georgetown and St. Johns become exciting matchups for the better ACC programs, along with a reason for fans to show up at dumpster fires like Pitt, Cuse and BCU.

I don't know how you do a 29 team tournament, so there are still some things to work out on the hoops side, but this doesn't suck.

UConn football would be a useful addition, and also help make Syracuse, Pitt and BCU more relevant. It would also be a cheap one since the net benefit of bringing an entire basketball league over would more than offset any incremental cost of UConn earning its way into a membership in the ACC. There is no financial justification for the ACC ever bringing UConn over as a one-off, all sports addition.

This is the only realistic path for UConn to get into the ACC before about 2040, if ever. Or we can follow the basketball haters strategy of pining for the AAC while hoping for some P4 conference to add UConn as a one-off, full member, because that will never happen.
 
A merger does shuffle the deck for the ACC, which it badly needs, since right now it has a losing hand relative to the P2. Keeping the revenue segregated for now between the two leagues would enable this to be a low cost event for the ACC, but it would open the ACC to big new markets which its earlier Big East additions (Pitt, Syracuse, BCU) never delivered. The Big East schools have proven they can hang in hoops, and adding creating a strong network of schools in the north and east makes its existing schools more valuable. UConn, Villanova, Georgetown and St. Johns become exciting matchups for the better ACC programs, along with a reason for fans to show up at dumpster fires like Pitt, Cuse and BCU.

I don't know how you do a 29 team tournament, so there are still some things to work out on the hoops side, but this doesn't suck.

UConn football would be a useful addition, and also help make Syracuse, Pitt and BCU more relevant. It would also be a cheap one since the net benefit of bringing an entire basketball league over would more than offset any incremental cost of UConn earning its way into a membership in the ACC. There is no financial justification for the ACC ever bringing UConn over as a one-off, all sports addition.

This is the only realistic path for UConn to get into the ACC before about 2040, if ever. Or we can follow the basketball haters strategy of pining for the AAC while hoping for some P4 conference to add UConn as a one-off, full member, because that will never happen.
The ACC is already too diluted from its core to be interesting
 



Per the article:

Big East commissioner Val Ackerman talked about the proposal during an appearance on John Ourand’s The Varsity podcast, saying there have been some “conversations” about the future of both conferences.

“There’s been some conversations about what we could all be doing together, again, not only to secure our own futures, but to make sure that college basketball stays strong and relevant as football interests continue to dominate much of the headlines and much of the bandwidth of the leagues that we consider peer conferences,” Ackerman told Ourand."

So how far up have those talks gone? Does that mean that she has had talks with the ACC Commissioner, Jim Phillips?

Also, what happens with UConn football? I would hate for the ACC to get our basketball program without our football program. But we would have no choice but to go along with it.
 
Why would the ACC want all of the Big East teams? Take Georgetown, Villanova, UConn, consider Marquette and Creighton. ST.John’s brings nothing to the table except another mouth to feed. With UConn, Syracuse, NYC is covered. The ACC doesn’t need the whole Big East.
 
The merger would be glorious. The ACC could organize the basketball conference any way it likes. It could have 2 completely separate divisions and have mini conference tournaments, with the winner of each mini-tourney play for the grand prize. Or 2 divisions and one large tourney. Really expands the footprint with great basketball matchups. Makes it the clear best basketball conference by far and gives it more leverage when the P2 try to split off. Leaves the Big 12 in the dust.

Make It So Patrick Stewart GIF
 
The only thing the ACC football schools wants from the Big East is to host the tournament at Madison Square Garden.

If I were the Big East commissioner I would never merge with the ACC. The basketball schools have nothing to gain long-term and a lot to lose. They have already been through this for many years so why fall for this crap again?

The basketball-only/football school hybrid model does NOT work long term
 
The only thing the ACC football schools wants from the Big East is to host the tournament at Madison Square Garden.

If I were the Big East commissioner I would never merge with the ACC. The basketball schools have nothing to gain long-term and a lot to lose. They have already been through this for many years so why fall for this crap again?

The basketball-only/football school hybrid model does NOT work long term
All of the Big East teams gain big-time by playing other historically good basketball programs regularly and virtually eliminates the threat of being completely shut out by future realignment. This idea of olympic sports having to follow football all over the country is going to go away at some point.

The hybrid model worked great for 20 years before the ACC poached the Big East. It works if the members are all in.
 
The merger would be glorious. The ACC could organize the basketball conference any way it likes. It could have 2 completely separate divisions and have mini conference tournaments, with the winner of each mini-tourney play for the grand prize. Or 2 divisions and one large tourney. Really expands the footprint with great basketball matchups. Makes it the clear best basketball conference by far and gives it more leverage when the P2 try to split off. Leaves the Big 12 in the dust.

Make It So Patrick Stewart GIF
So you're assuming that the ACC takes our football program? Or you don't care?
 

Online statistics

Members online
89
Guests online
1,089
Total visitors
1,178

Forum statistics

Threads
163,970
Messages
4,377,038
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom