26-27 season | Page 4 | The Boneyard

26-27 season

Crooks can score but then completely compromises your defense! We need someone who will not hurt us on one end more than she helps on the other! HH is not coming! We need an enforcer with skills! If the powers that be have decided to follow the W into this physical, wrestle mania style of play, we are going to need to toughen up considerably. We do have some physical specimens on this team but everyone is way too nice to play that way naturally. Hopefully, Geno will address this (perhaps in the portal but more importantly, in training camp) and get our squad a little better prepared for the wrestling match awaiting us in the FF!
I totally agree about everything you just said. I only tossed Crooks name out there because she is in the portal and scores a lot.

I dont want her either. No way.

Hidalgo already said she is staying at Notre Dame.

But we do need to get tougher and more physical. You can't just wanna win a championship you have to take it. You have to take no prisoners.

We have to make other teams scared of the name on our jerseys again.

The two toughest players we have are Blanca and K9.

I think I have seen K9 end up 3 rolls in the stands chasing lose balls. Thats what we need.
 
Chatter online about HH but nothing about Edwards. Probably all hearsay.
Ok because I have seen here and online that Hildago has already said that she is staying with the Golden Domers. The next 16 days, or so, will tell.
 
Ok because I have seen here and online that Hildago has already said that she is staying with the Golden Domers. The next 16 days, or so, will tell.
Agree. Now let's not lose focus on the OP about our team.
 
Agree. Now let's not lose focus on the OP about our team.
I was only questioning posts (ie post 82) that mentioned two, very improbable, incoming players. I'll stop posting in this thread then.
Déjà vu all over again.
 
You are 100% wrong in your alleged analysis of what supposedly was wrong with our team this year (or last night if that’s what you meant) and to blame KK’s play for the loss last night. All year she was and is a great game manager and floor general, my God, she just shattered Paige’s record for assist to turnover ratio and lead the nation and shot 57% from the field. She was definitely NOT the problem last night, I have no idea what game you were watching to come up with such inane drivel.She did her job and played very well. I’m not even going to waste any more time setting forth all the stats that would demonstrate the fallacy of your unwarranted attack on KK but will address this ridiculous statement by you. “ For the 2026-2027 team to win” Kayleigh must start and KK has to come off the bench- WHAT???? Any Coach, team, player or fan in the country would consider 38-1 and a FF appearance as an unprecedented great winning season, not to mention 54 straight wins. She is truly the heart and soul of this team on court and off and to state that she should be benched her senior year after the season she and the team just had ( and 2 fantastic years prior btw) is patently absurd.
It was my perspective that KK's decline in productivity and playing time was the direct result of K9's elevation of playing time. That's not to mean KK isn't valuable, because she is, but K9 produced more on the offensive end than KK the second half of the season.
 
It was my perspective that KK's decline in productivity and playing time was the direct result of K9's elevation of playing time. That's not to mean KK isn't valuable, because she is, but K9 produced more on the offensive end than KK the second half of the season.
K9 is the better overall player/point guard than KK. It's not even close.

Defensively KK is a little better but offensively K9 is a lot better.

But I see both of them as starters next year. KK will be the point and K9 will move into Azzis shooting guard spot.

I dont know if this has anything to do with anything but maybe it was no coincidence that K9 and Azzi were roommates..Maybe K9 was the Apprentice.
 
.-.
Jana played 8 minutes, She had 0 points, 0 rebounds, 0 assists, 0 blocks, and 1 TO.

I thought Serah played better. In 14 minutes she had 4 points, 5 rebounds, and 1 block with 1 TO. I was hoping Geno would give her more time on the court
Our 5's may not have done very well, Serah better than Jana, but the most telling thing is our 5's played 22 minutes combined, not 40, meaning for those other 18 minutes the choice was a guard instead. We don't use a backup 4 either, using a guard instead, and play a guard instead of a natural 3 for most of the game.

When it is not Serah or Jana at the 5, Sarah at the 4, or Blanca at the 3, we use a guard, not necessarily at that position, but that is the player who comes in. When we don't play a 5 we go smaller at three positions at once because Sarah goes to the 5, Blanca to the 4, and a guard to the 3. One position bigger than their natural one in each case.

I know it is one of the favorite topics on the Boneyard, but I'm not sure small ball can be expected to have much success against the very best teams. We try to make up for a relative rebounding weakness by getting a huge turnover advantage. Against most teams that trade off works, but against top teams that handle the press well I would fully expect to get outrebounded and have a much smaller turnover advantage. I also think small ball in a game played mostly in the halfcourt is not nearly the advantage as when we are pressing full court.

Clearly Geno lacked confidence in his 5's, didn't think he had a playable backup 4, and only had just one available true 3 in Blanca. I hope Olivia is the real deal and with Jana they can earn 40 minutes a game. I hope we pick up a rotation worthy backup 4 for Sarah so we don't have to use Blanca there, and I hope Blanca can get starter minutes at the 3. That would be close to a traditional lineup. In a perfect scenario of Olivia being great, Jana significantly better, and a significant big pickup we could even dream of a big option, meaning Olivia some at the 4, Sarah at the 3, or Blanca at the 2.
 
What do you think about playing Sarah and Bianca on the wing with KK at the point
the freshman at Center with Jana — and we recruit in the portal a lean mean athletic 4 in the portal.
 
M
K9 is the better overall player/point guard than KK. It's not even close.

Defensively KK is a little better but offensively K9 is a lot better.

But I see both of them as starters next year. KK will be the point and K9 will move into Azzis shooting guard spot.

I dont know if this has anything to do with anything but maybe it was no coincidence that K9 and Azzi were roommates..Maybe K9 was the Apprentice.
K9 is better than KK and it’s not even close?!? Listen you are entitled to your opinion but that’s all it is, a personally biased opinion not based on any legitimate data or facts to back it up. This platform exists ( I thought) to talk about and discuss our beloved Huskies and the team’s games and news and developments associated with the team without being unfair or criticizing these wonderful young ladies personally. Therefore I’m not going to compare the accomplishments and games of these 2 excellent athletes to denigrate one over the other. However, KK’s game and the respect that her teammates and opponents and coaches have for her speaks for itself. She does not take a backseat to any PG in the country and there’s no guard in the country ( let alone on her own team) that she’s “ not even close” to as an all around player. Ask Geno, ask Kelsy Plum, ask Hannah Hidalgo just to name a few.
 
At least I am honest.

"There is no guard in the country that KK is not even close to as an all around player"

Then you believe she is equal to Hildago because you finished your rant with ask Hildago. And Kelsey Plum too?

You are entitled to your own opinion but I wont call you biased.

I believe that K9 is a better all around player than KK. So what? How is that biased?
These were Hildagos stats this year.

  • 25.3 points a game
  • 6.9 REB
  • 5.2 AST
  • 47.5 FG%
    And she was National Defensive player of the year.
    As much as I like KK, I wont compare her to HH.
 
So now I’m not honest because I state my opinion which I believe is accurate, unlike yours that KK is not even close to being the player that Kaleigh is. It wasn’t a rant either, if you bothered to actually read and understand what I wrote it was simply a defense of KK with regards to your ridiculously insulting statement and opinion of her. I wasn’t comparing her to Hidalgo or Plum, or saying she wss their equal, I was merely saying that there is no PG in the country who she isn’t at least close to as an impactful player. If you cared to research or know about KK you’d realize that HH just said in an interview last week after ND was eliminated that KK was without question the toughest defensive player she has faced and that last summer after she was again invited to and attended Kelsey Plum’s Dawg Camp ( for elite ncaa players where she and her staff help train them to improve their game and prepare for transition to the WNBA) she was unanimously voted to receive the prestigious “ Top Dawg” award as the best player at camp, and Kelsey said it wasn't even close and that she was unbelievable from start to finish.That is why I said ask Hannah or Kelsey.
I am not going to get into an argument with you.

I know exactly what you said and you know exactly what you said.

If you read my original post (and please do) I also said that KK should be the starting point guard next year..NOT K9. I have repeatedly said that there is no way that Geno would sit her during her senior year.

I also said that K9 would probably and should be moved to the shooting guard. (Azzis spot)
As far as the comparison between the two players goes:

I said KK is a little better defensively but K9 is the much better offensive player.

If you disagree so be it.

As far as you claiming that KK is as good as any point guard in the country goes, that is the really "biased" statement.

As much as all of us like KK and all the Uconn players it is totally unfair to someone like Hildago to say that.

I am no Notre Dame fan but I will call them as I see them.

It's outrageous to compare any point guard to Hildago. Be it a Uconn player or anyone else.
 
.-.
Great discussion on the players and potential lineups.

I’m simply hoping that Geno ditches his grumpy old man demeanor and actions from the sweet sixteen through the final four semifinals. It got old and he lost some of his legend luster because of it.
 
So I've been thinking about this and have a slightly different take. Please excuse the length of this post as I'm rambling thoughts together.

First, in that 2nd half, SC played their A- game, and we played our C game. part of the reason we played and shot poorly was because of SC so kudos to them. But I agree with those who say we lacked toughness.

Azzi wilted. Sarah, for all her gifts, is not an Alpha. KK, for all her intense defense, and terrific A/TO ratio, seemingly won't attack the basket if she thinks she will draw a whiff of physical contact. Ash, for all her toughness and physicality on defense almost never drives to the basket - preferring 3 point shot, or pull up jumper. The 2 toughest players on our team are Blanca and Kayleigh. I'm not sure about Morgan.

My first 2 thoughts are that we need a tough physical forward/post player. Someone like a Tina Charles. I don't mean an AA or NPOY like she was, but someone who will grind thru the physical contact and give as good as she gets. I don't think Jana can do that without fouling out and I'm not sure about Olivia.

My second thought is we need a 6'4" athletic type with long arms who actually knows how to play in the post. Uche from Syracuse comes to mind.

Having thought about all that, I watched UCLA absolutely destroy SC without a single elite athlete on the floor for UCLA. I suppose Rice is their most athletic, but the rest of the team was just tall, fundamentally sound, and mobile enough. So I'm not necessarily thinking we need more athletes, and maybe go back to needing more toughness.

All season long, a few of us noted (and were criticized by others on here for it), that while we would win games by 40 or whatever, we were incapable of putting together 40 minutes of quality basketball, and more often than not it was about 20 minutes of really good basketball and 10 minutes of below average basketball (by our starters) as Geno usually had the reserves in during the last 10 minutes. Our scoring numbers looked great when we played teams we could turn over and turn that into fast break points, but our half court offense was really average for long stretches of uninspired play.

UConn is not a program that thrives on one-on-one play. A player like Juju who takes 20+ shots most every game to get her points would not mesh well with how Geno runs offense. And as much as our offense looked "pretty" with lots of passing and motion and what not, it was sloppy and ineffective far too often.

I am not a smart enough offensive technician, but if even my couch potato eyes could see how much we struggled in the half court against woefully inferior competition for stretches that lasted far too long, surely Geno and the staff could see it too. I hope Geno can figure out a new wrinkle, and add maybe a new player or 2 for next season that helps address it.

Geno's shown over the years to be a true master of changing with the times and adjusting our offense and defense to best take advantage of the strengths of the team and mask the weaknesses. Against SC it seemed to be lack of length, inability to score over or around length, and lack of toughness. Oh, and if the 3's aren't falling... you know the saying, if you live by the 3, you can die by it too.
 
So I've been thinking about this and have a slightly different take. Please excuse the length of this post as I'm rambling thoughts together.

First, in that 2nd half, SC played their A- game, and we played our C game. part of the reason we played and shot poorly was because of SC so kudos to them. But I agree with those who say we lacked toughness.

Azzi wilted. Sarah, for all her gifts, is not an Alpha. KK, for all her intense defense, and terrific A/TO ratio, seemingly won't attack the basket if she thinks she will draw a whiff of physical contact. Ash, for all her toughness and physicality on defense almost never drives to the basket - preferring 3 point shot, or pull up jumper. The 2 toughest players on our team are Blanca and Kayleigh. I'm not sure about Morgan.

My first 2 thoughts are that we need a tough physical forward/post player. Someone like a Tina Charles. I don't mean an AA or NPOY like she was, but someone who will grind thru the physical contact and give as good as she gets. I don't think Jana can do that without fouling out and I'm not sure about Olivia.

My second thought is we need a 6'4" athletic type with long arms who actually knows how to play in the post. Uche from Syracuse comes to mind.

Having thought about all that, I watched UCLA absolutely destroy SC without a single elite athlete on the floor for UCLA. I suppose Rice is their most athletic, but the rest of the team was just tall, fundamentally sound, and mobile enough. So I'm not necessarily thinking we need more athletes, and maybe go back to needing more toughness.

All season long, a few of us noted (and were criticized by others on here for it), that while we would win games by 40 or whatever, we were incapable of putting together 40 minutes of quality basketball, and more often than not it was about 20 minutes of really good basketball and 10 minutes of below average basketball (by our starters) as Geno usually had the reserves in during the last 10 minutes. Our scoring numbers looked great when we played teams we could turn over and turn that into fast break points, but our half court offense was really average for long stretches of uninspired play.

UConn is not a program that thrives on one-on-one play. A player like Juju who takes 20+ shots most every game to get her points would not mesh well with how Geno runs offense. And as much as our offense looked "pretty" with lots of passing and motion and what not, it was sloppy and ineffective far too often.

I am not a smart enough offensive technician, but if even my couch potato eyes could see how much we struggled in the half court against woefully inferior competition for stretches that lasted far too long, surely Geno and the staff could see it too. I hope Geno can figure out a new wrinkle, and add maybe a new player or 2 for next season that helps address it.

Geno's shown over the years to be a true master of changing with the times and adjusting our offense and defense to best take advantage of the strengths of the team and mask the weaknesses. Against SC it seemed to be lack of length, inability to score over or around length, and lack of toughness. Oh, and if the 3's aren't falling... you know the saying, if you live by the 3, you can die by it too.
100% this. Now that we are in the morning, morning, morning after, I'm still pretty calm about Friday night, and yesterday's finals was the cherry on top. Although SC had a great game plan for us (but who was scouting UCLA?), having Sarah and Ash be the only players in double figures, and not getting any significant pts from Azzi and Blanca, we were, in fact, literally doomed.

  • Ash & KK will be seniors, and now that they've seen it all, I expect them to come back as driven players
  • Jana, Morgan, and Allie all have things to work on to be significant contributors for various reasons
  • Blanca now has a year of college hoop experience, so I would think that her jump to sophomore year will be impressive
  • K9 did very well in her first year at UConn, and she will use this loss as motivation, as now she knows how and what it takes to get there
  • Kelis and Gandy are the unknowns and hopefully they will make some sort of jump
  • As for Ice & Yanna, I would like to see them back as 5th year seniors and provide some leadership. We don't know the extent of Ice's rehab, so for now, I'm not going to assume anything. Thinking it would have been nice to have Ice banging in the paint on Friday night.
 
K9 is the better overall player/point guard than KK. It's not even close.

Defensively KK is a little better but offensively K9 is a lot better.

But I see both of them as starters next year. KK will be the point and K9 will move into Azzis shooting guard spot.

I dont know if this has anything to do with anything but maybe it was no coincidence that K9 and Azzi were roommates..Maybe K9 was the Apprentice.
That's a very small team. I think you will see Olivia, Jana or a transfer start with Sarah, Blanca, Ash and KK.
 
That's a very small team. I think you will see Olivia, Jana or a transfer start with Sarah, Blanca, Ash and KK.
True, knowing Geno you can probably pencil in Sarah, Blanca, Ash and KK.
Somebody has to take over Azzis shooting guard spot though.

The logical choice in my opinion is K9. Unless you move Blanca to that spot. She would be a 6ft 2 inch shooting guard.

As far as a 5 spot goes we dont have a proven player. Unless Jana has a great off-season then that will solve a lot of problems and we dont know what Olivia is yet.

This whole free agency portal stuff is another matter. Right now we can only work with what we have. We have 10 returning players as of today.
 
True, knowing Geno you can probably pencil in Sarah, Blanca, Ash and KK.
Somebody has to take over Azzis shooting guard spot though.

The logical choice in my opinion is K9. Unless you move Blanca to that spot. She would be a 6ft 2 inch shooting guard.

As far as a 5 spot goes we dont have a proven player. Unless Jana has a great off-season then that will solve a lot of problems and we dont know what Olivia is yet.

This whole free agency portal stuff is another matter. Right now we can only work with what we have. We have 10 returning players as of today.
Officially, we have 12 players until otherwise announced.
 
.-.
So I've been thinking about this and have a slightly different take. Please excuse the length of this post as I'm rambling thoughts together.

First, in that 2nd half, SC played their A- game, and we played our C game. part of the reason we played and shot poorly was because of SC so kudos to them. But I agree with those who say we lacked toughness.

Azzi wilted. Sarah, for all her gifts, is not an Alpha. KK, for all her intense defense, and terrific A/TO ratio, seemingly won't attack the basket if she thinks she will draw a whiff of physical contact. Ash, for all her toughness and physicality on defense almost never drives to the basket - preferring 3 point shot, or pull up jumper. The 2 toughest players on our team are Blanca and Kayleigh. I'm not sure about Morgan.

My first 2 thoughts are that we need a tough physical forward/post player. Someone like a Tina Charles. I don't mean an AA or NPOY like she was, but someone who will grind thru the physical contact and give as good as she gets. I don't think Jana can do that without fouling out and I'm not sure about Olivia.

My second thought is we need a 6'4" athletic type with long arms who actually knows how to play in the post. Uche from Syracuse comes to mind.

Having thought about all that, I watched UCLA absolutely destroy SC without a single elite athlete on the floor for UCLA. I suppose Rice is their most athletic, but the rest of the team was just tall, fundamentally sound, and mobile enough. So I'm not necessarily thinking we need more athletes, and maybe go back to needing more toughness.

All season long, a few of us noted (and were criticized by others on here for it), that while we would win games by 40 or whatever, we were incapable of putting together 40 minutes of quality basketball, and more often than not it was about 20 minutes of really good basketball and 10 minutes of below average basketball (by our starters) as Geno usually had the reserves in during the last 10 minutes. Our scoring numbers looked great when we played teams we could turn over and turn that into fast break points, but our half court offense was really average for long stretches of uninspired play.

UConn is not a program that thrives on one-on-one play. A player like Juju who takes 20+ shots most every game to get her points would not mesh well with how Geno runs offense. And as much as our offense looked "pretty" with lots of passing and motion and what not, it was sloppy and ineffective far too often.

I am not a smart enough offensive technician, but if even my couch potato eyes could see how much we struggled in the half court against woefully inferior competition for stretches that lasted far too long, surely Geno and the staff could see it too. I hope Geno can figure out a new wrinkle, and add maybe a new player or 2 for next season that helps address it.

Geno's shown over the years to be a true master of changing with the times and adjusting our offense and defense to best take advantage of the strengths of the team and mask the weaknesses. Against SC it seemed to be lack of length, inability to score over or around length, and lack of toughness. Oh, and if the 3's aren't falling... you know the saying, if you live by the 3, you can die by it too.
Geno's teams in the past several years have had issue with a strong defensive athletic and big teams like SC. Its no surprise that Dawn has been recruiting this way and other teams have also tried to be extremely physical with us. There was a game several years ago where Geno threw a water bottle on the floor because of the way Paige was getting manhandled by the opposing team. The game that Geno wants to promote is a beautiful game, one that flows, one that if true rules are followed fouls would be called and defenses would have to play UCONN with less physicality. Teams know that if they play that way it is almost impossible to beat UCONN. Last year we had a generational talent who could relieve a lot of the pressure off of Strong and Azzi. Not to mention Paige's defense is outstanding, so you had a complete player who could also take over the game at any time.

HOWEVER reality is that refs can't call fouls every single possession. I was a little disappointed that Geno didn't have the team more prepared for a very physical game plan authored by Dawn with the chance that the refs would not call a lot of the contact, but my hope is that Geno can adapt, which I believe he will. I'm not saying the kids on team are not uber competitve, but perhaps this team was a little too nice. Inserting some physicality and junkyard dogs into this team maybe one way to compete better againt the more physical teams. I am 99.9% certain he reads the BY and what Dawn did is not going to sit well with him as well as the fan comments directed his way. He is a proud man and I think he will more than ever want to make UCONN bad for wcbb. I don't think we wants his legacy to be about what happened at the FF this year.

I haven't been able to watch many games outside of the UCONN ones, so not sure there are any no brainers out there in terms of the players in the portal, but I believe we could certainly use an athletic big that can rebound and be an elite defender and an athletic 2 way guard that can shoot the 3. One last comment is that even though Geno doesn't like 1-on-1 play, I do believe we need to have a player that can absolutely go 1 on 1 and initiate contact to force the ref to call a foul or at least make the defense collapse and we can kick out to shooters, especially when its tourmanent time and where stars shine and where the game situations call upon 1-on-1 sets. This year I don't think we had a player that gave us this dimension.
 
Great discussion on the players and potential lineups.

I’m simply hoping that Geno ditches his grumpy old man demeanor and actions from the sweet sixteen through the final four semifinals. It got old and he lost some of his legend luster because of it.
Doubt you’ll see that again. He’s been pretty popular over the years with camera crews….he knows his sideline rant - especially at Dawn Staley, was a mistake. While he’s already apologized, for many, it isn’t enough, since he failed to mention Dawn’s name specifically. But, Geno knows how important perception is, so expect you’ll be seeing his “bright side” in the future.😎
 
Interesting article about next year.

Seems Geno is looking to the "portal" for a high scorer to replace Azzi.

With Geno Auriemma and Sarah Strong back at UConn, are the Huskies 2027 contenders? - The Athletic With Geno Auriemma and Sarah Strong back at UConn, are the Huskies 2027 contenders?
The only thing the article says is the following, and it's the writer's opinion that Geno needs to, and will be involved. IMO, UConn doesn't comment on what they are doing until it is done.

Well, Auriemma needs to get into the portal this offseason and find an elite scorer. With Fudd gone to the WNBA, the Huskies will rely heavily on Strong and Quiñonez, but the loss to South Carolina showed that they need to find a third, high-level scorer.
Expect UConn to be heavily involved with bringing in pieces to replace not just Fudd, but also Williams.
 
So I've been thinking about this and have a slightly different take. Please excuse the length of this post as I'm rambling thoughts together.

First, in that 2nd half, SC played their A- game, and we played our C game. part of the reason we played and shot poorly was because of SC so kudos to them. But I agree with those who say we lacked toughness.

Azzi wilted. Sarah, for all her gifts, is not an Alpha. KK, for all her intense defense, and terrific A/TO ratio, seemingly won't attack the basket if she thinks she will draw a whiff of physical contact. Ash, for all her toughness and physicality on defense almost never drives to the basket - preferring 3 point shot, or pull up jumper. The 2 toughest players on our team are Blanca and Kayleigh. I'm not sure about Morgan.

My first 2 thoughts are that we need a tough physical forward/post player. Someone like a Tina Charles. I don't mean an AA or NPOY like she was, but someone who will grind thru the physical contact and give as good as she gets. I don't think Jana can do that without fouling out and I'm not sure about Olivia.

My second thought is we need a 6'4" athletic type with long arms who actually knows how to play in the post. Uche from Syracuse comes to mind.

Having thought about all that, I watched UCLA absolutely destroy SC without a single elite athlete on the floor for UCLA. I suppose Rice is their most athletic, but the rest of the team was just tall, fundamentally sound, and mobile enough. So I'm not necessarily thinking we need more athletes, and maybe go back to needing more toughness.

All season long, a few of us noted (and were criticized by others on here for it), that while we would win games by 40 or whatever, we were incapable of putting together 40 minutes of quality basketball, and more often than not it was about 20 minutes of really good basketball and 10 minutes of below average basketball (by our starters) as Geno usually had the reserves in during the last 10 minutes. Our scoring numbers looked great when we played teams we could turn over and turn that into fast break points, but our half court offense was really average for long stretches of uninspired play.

UConn is not a program that thrives on one-on-one play. A player like Juju who takes 20+ shots most every game to get her points would not mesh well with how Geno runs offense. And as much as our offense looked "pretty" with lots of passing and motion and what not, it was sloppy and ineffective far too often.

I am not a smart enough offensive technician, but if even my couch potato eyes could see how much we struggled in the half court against woefully inferior competition for stretches that lasted far too long, surely Geno and the staff could see it too. I hope Geno can figure out a new wrinkle, and add maybe a new player or 2 for next season that helps address it.

Geno's shown over the years to be a true master of changing with the times and adjusting our offense and defense to best take advantage of the strengths of the team and mask the weaknesses. Against SC it seemed to be lack of length, inability to score over or around length, and lack of toughness. Oh, and if the 3's aren't falling... you know the saying, if you live by the 3, you can die by it too.
Your post is spot on. Especially about "Blanca and K9 being our two toughest players"

Blanca is tough probably because of that European style of play. And K9 plays schoolyard type of basketball with a skill set.

How many times have we seen K9 on the floor or 3 rolls in the seats chasing lose balls. She is a good rebounder too for her size.

I remember Nika being tough too.

But I hate to bring this up for the hundredth time: Our conference hurts us lol.

Those SEC games are all physical and we are playing the sisters of the poor. (To use an old expression) It hurts us come tourney time.

The old days we had tough physical opponents like Rutgers, Notre Dame (usually 3 times a year), Louisville etc. Tennessee used to be twice a year, long time ago.
 
How is it that every incoming big recruit on other teams seems bound to be great, but somehow “we don’t know what Olivia” will turn out to be? I’m not saying Olivia is a sure thing. Far from it. But perhaps we should extend the same skepticism about other teams’ recuits too. This also applies to high profile transfers like Okot, who played well in the regular season but folded up shop against seasoned big competition like Betts and Dugalic.
 
.-.
I haven’t seen Morgan mentioned in some threads. There have been recent videos of her working out with the team (limited contact) but she could help with rebounding and tons of other intangibles
To be honest I am losing track of which players (hurt ones) have either graduated or still have eligibility. I was hoping someone can refresh us.

We have some players who have been hurt for a couple years. Ice for one.
 
Lots to figure out.

First is who is back and who is healthy and ready.

Kk - shade - Blanca - Ss likely starters.

Probably Jana or Olivia as 5th. But maybe AllieZ or Heckel.

That’s not the most intimidating lineup. I would sluff off KK Shade Jana.

Not sure what to expect of any of the rest — cheli ice Ayanna Gandy Kelis Jovana.

SS needs to come back pissed. As I said during gsme chat, hopefully this is like 2001.
I was perplexed when Geno decided not to use Allie Z in the final against both Carolina. She logged 1 minute of playing time. And she is smart, confident ( or was, up until then ) and one of our best shooters ( when no one else could hit anything ). I really believe Geno was so "enraged" at Dawn ( or South Carolina, or something ) , that he lost focus on his coaching.
 
To be honest I am losing track of which players (hurt ones) have either graduated or still have eligibility. I was hoping someone can refresh us.

We have some players who have been hurt for a couple years. Ice for one.
I put this in another thread but I’ll repost it here along with my statement that comments speculating, wondering, theorizing or any kind of mention of UConn transfers is not allowed. This includes comments like “If she comes back…” or “If she uses all of her eligibility “ Unless there is an announcement by a player or the school, assume everyone is returning

 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,566
Messages
4,583,281
Members
10,493
Latest member
Mwil1032


Top Bottom