2026 Transfer portal | Page 14 | The Boneyard

2026 Transfer portal

Oh, that didn't come out nearly as well as I thought.
It was pretty well known the twins were being bid as a package during high school. So, they were greeted by Tennessee, but that experiment didn't work. So, I think the Pauldo brain trust will go back to work and try to work another arrangement out.
I personally think they'll want to stay together and might be best to play at a school that's having a rebuild. They're from northern NJ, so Penn State or Rutgers come to mind. But I could see them in Orange at Syracuse.
I hope Syracuse doesn't bite.
 
Oh, that didn't come out nearly as well as I thought.
It was pretty well known the twins were being bid as a package during high school. So, they were greeted by Tennessee, but that experiment didn't work. So, I think the Pauldo brain trust will go back to work and try to work another arrangement out.
I personally think they'll want to stay together and might be best to play at a school that's having a rebuild. They're from northern NJ, so Penn State or Rutgers come to mind. But I could see them in Orange at Syracuse.
ok, Got it!! Thanks!
 
Very poor man, but I'd take her.
Is the "I" in your sentence Dawn Staley or Mark Campbell? I can see the latter, but my point was simply that living and dying by the portal year after year is a battle of constant attrition. He *had*to do it in years 1 and 2 but at some point I'd like to see him develop his own recruits because I actually think he has the potential to be a solid developmental coach as well.
 
.-.
Heads up, could be some NCAA action this spring


Pretty sure this would not hold up if challenged in court, in fact the transfer portal itself would not hold up in court.

Court has consistently ruled that a student/athlete should be treated as any other employee...and that all tuition paying/student fee paying students are eligible for teams.

Coaches do not have a transfer portal to change schools, hence players should be treated similarly.

Not that I like it, it's just the way decisions are made.

So far no player has challenged the portal in court, players actually like it, it's fun.
 
Heavy emphasis on yet. While the names have been pouring in, we have a long way to go to get the usual 1100 or 1200 or so.
Might be tailing off a little as the covid year is pretty well used up so the 5th year players will not be around.
 
Might be tailing off a little as the covid year is pretty well used up so the 5th year players will not be around.
I really don't think that's it. It was Pandora's box and that thing ain't getting closed now that it's open. Just look at how much activity we've already had when players can't even officially enter the portal yet.
 
.-.
Pretty sure this would not hold up if challenged in court, in fact the transfer portal itself would not hold up in court.

Court has consistently ruled that a student/athlete should be treated as any other employee...and that all tuition paying/student fee paying students are eligible for teams.

Coaches do not have a transfer portal to change schools, hence players should be treated similarly.

Not that I like it, it's just the way decisions are made.

So far no player has challenged the portal in court, players actually like it, it's fun.
This penalty is to schools, not players, and no student or player has any right to expect anything from a school she is not enrolled at. NCAA can and does enforce all sorts of rules on schools and coaches.
 
I really don't think that's it. It was Pandora's box and that thing ain't getting closed now that it's open. Just look at how much activity we've already had when players can't even officially enter the portal yet.
Oh it is going to continue to be wild west - just mean the total players who have available eligibility is reduced by close to 25% now that we are mostly beyond 5 year eligibility. Still a few injury folks like here at Uconn, but that is not anywhere near the whole of the 4 classes in school in 2021.
 
This penalty is to schools, not players, and no student or player has any right to expect anything from a school she is not enrolled at. NCAA can and does enforce all sorts of rules on schools and coaches.
Player will enroll at new school. Walk to gym and ask to play. If denied, they will sue to play in local State Court.

Court will issue injunction allowing "student at school to try out for team at that school", while actual court case grinds thru the system.

This rule, and portal in general, sets up an artificial barrier for student/athlete/employees to change jobs and/or compete in athletics for their school.

I'd prefer the old system too, but NCAA has not won a court case in about 20 years.
 
Oh it is going to continue to be wild west - just mean the total players who have available eligibility is reduced by close to 25% now that we are mostly beyond 5 year eligibility. Still a few injury folks like here at Uconn, but that is not anywhere near the whole of the 4 classes in school in 2021.
I get your point. The majority of the extra covid year eligible players were gone after last season, and there was still the 1000+ names in the portal. There were a few still this year, but already the bulk of them had moved through. We'll see what this off season ends up looking like.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,158
Messages
4,555,099
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom