2026 schedule and search for 12th game | Page 4 | The Boneyard

2026 schedule and search for 12th game

I’m intrigued by the folks who think they know refusing to give up a name for what, $10?

I guess after weeks of info bombardment; a down time would drive discussions like these
 
freescooter said:
You are allowed to “withhold” information on a contract that is under negotiation, though. Guessing that is what going on here. Once the agreement is locked down they will announce it. The fact that some individual or group has leaked the information is interesting but not relevant.
Expand ...
That is correct. But they are presumably not “withholding” it. They are telling some folks and not everyone. That is not a how state with strict FOIA laws is supposed to operate.
 
Last edited:
UConnDan97 said:
Why do I get the sense that BizLaw is gonna be the first guy to ever file a Freedom Of Information Act request to find out a football game location...
Expand ...
Nah. I’ll wait or look it up. But I think I’m allowed to be bothered by a state entity in effect selling early access to public information. It is not a good precedent, and while it’s fine if this one doesn’t bother you we could easily hypothesize situations where it would.
 
businesslawyer said:
That is correct. But they are presumably not “withholding” it. They are telling some folks and not everyone. That is not a state with strict FOIA laws is supposed to operate.
Expand ...
If the other school hasn’t announced either it likely isn’t 100% executed. But either way without saying who I wouldn’t get too excited waiting to find out.
 
The FOIA is literally the public institution giving an individual information without widely telling everyone else. They often give said information and receive money (aka selling it) for giving providing that information to that individual..

Aside from those points, the state is not in fact selling information or doing anything in relation to the FOIA in this case. The idea that they need to tell the boneyard if they tell any other particular person is quite an interesting theory though.
 
.-.
FightOnCT said:
Expand ...

I had guessed USF as #12 in another thread since Uconn owes an @ USF game (9-2-2028). But this post seems to rule that out even though
fbschedules.com

Future College Football Schedules | FBSchedules.com

View future college football schedules and opponents at FBSchedules.com. We have future schedules for all FBS and FCS teams.
fbschedules.com
hasn't listed Kent St yet as USF's OOC game 4. My 2nd guess would be FIU since we owe them a game (2027) and swapping it up to this year would give them 4 OOC and fill out both schedules for 2026

1769775013677.png

1769774810547.png
 
businesslawyer said:
Nah. I’ll wait or look it up. But I think I’m allowed to be bothered by a state entity in effect selling early access to public information. It is not a good precedent, and while it’s fine if this one doesn’t bother you we could easily hypothesize situations where it would.
Expand ...
Just maybe it's not signed yet? I mean, I guess you'll sue about the Notre Dame multi-year agreement not being consummated, as it was just as much "out there? "
 
The Kent State/USF game is a bummer because those were my top remaining choices. Although, what is interesting is the Pac 12 pushed back their announcement. Everything is trending toward Southern Miss.

Hot take: I'd rather play Jacksonville State than USM. Southern Miss won 7 games last year but they've been horrible before that. There's really not much to gain from that game other than a bad road loss. It's not like FIU where it's a destination game. I wouldn't be 100% shocked to see Jax State in that Sun Belt title game again. Still a decent atmosphere there (they have dorms that can see the field I think?), even if their stadium is a bit high-schoolish and a motivated fan base. Alabama may be a little better to visit than Mississippi?
 
businesslawyer said:
Nah. I’ll wait or look it up. But I think I’m allowed to be bothered by a state entity in effect selling early access to public information. It is not a good precedent, and while it’s fine if this one doesn’t bother you we could easily hypothesize situations where it would.
Expand ...
On principle, I agree with you. Transparency for any government agency is crucial, whether it's the Department of Corrections or the Department of Engineering. This is just a very weird instance to want to make that point, in my opinion.

It's clearly going to get released way ahead of the time anyone would realistically need to do anything with the information, and there's no preexisting government-stated deadline for the release...
 
jskwrite said:
Hot take: I'd rather play Jacksonville State than USM. Southern Miss won 7 games last year but they've been horrible before that. There's really not much to gain from that game other than a bad road loss. It's not like FIU where it's a destination game. I wouldn't be 100% shocked to see Jax State in that Sun Belt title game again.
Expand ...
FWIW, Jacksonville State’s not even in the Sun Belt. If UConn was to schedule a CUSA opponent, FIU might have been helpful for recruiting purposes in FL, and convenience for SE player’s’ families, alumni and other Huskies’ fans. Inconveniently, it appears that wasn’t possible to work out.

JSU’s located in a run down crap hole of a town and a CUSA school. Other than being under 2 hours from Atlanta, so direct flights to ATL, few if any truly compelling reasons exist to visit Jacksonville for fans. Even for Civil War history buffs, far more interesting locations exist. Luckily, the 12th game’s not in Jacksonville.
 
Last edited:
UConnDan97 said:
On principle, I agree with you. Transparency for any government agency is crucial, whether it's the Department of Corrections or the Department of Engineering. This is just a very weird instance to want to make that point, in my opinion.

It's clearly going to get released way ahead of the time anyone would realistically need to do anything with the information, and there's no preexisting government-stated deadline for the release...
Expand ...
Agree with all of that. As I keep saying, this is not really a football point. It’s a government point that has happened to come up in a football context.
 
.-.
UConnDan97 said:
Why do I get the sense that BizLaw is gonna be the first guy to ever file a Freedom Of Information Act request to find out a football game location...
Expand ...
We never heard how the class action suit over the Blue Lot was coming. Maybe this would just be another case of BLACO.
 
Da_Aisijimo_Gou said:
FWIW, Jacksonville State’s not even in the Sun Belt. If UConn was to schedule a CUSA opponent, FIU might have been helpful for recruiting purposes in FL, and convenience for SE player’s’ families, alumni and other Huskies’ fans. Inconveniently, it appears that wasn’t possible to work out.

JSU’s located in a run down crap hole of a town and a CUSA school. Other than being under 2 hours from Atlanta, so direct flights to ATL, few if any truly compelling reasons exist to visit Jacksonville for fans. Even for Civil War history buffs, far more interesting locations exist. Luckily, the 12th game’s not in Jacksonville.
Expand ...
Yes, it's a hole and Hattiesburg is a little closer to New Orleans than Jacksonville is to Atlanta but if you are considering a road game, Colorado Springs or Laramie would be far more scenic and interesting places to visit anyway, especially for outdoor stuff. Colorado Springs area is amazing, plus plenty of military history being a service academy (even if a more recent one).

It says a lot more for UConn's schedule that they add a third team that played in a G6 conference title game last year than a Southern Miss program that hasn't finished a regular season above .500 before last year since 2017 and the only thing they had going for them was a coach who left for Memphis. Jacksonville St actually seems to care about football still and has won 9 games all three years in FBS. I also think of it this way; a loss at Jacksonville State is going to age a lot better than a loss to Southern Miss.

I mean, the situation sucks anyway. I'd rather lose a buy game to be honest. Duke screwed us because they could have kept the extra OOC game - the ACC didn't force them to drop it. They just didn't want to lose to us again lol
 
businesslawyer said:
Agree with all of that. As I keep saying, this is not really a football point. It’s a government point that has happened to come up in a football context.
Expand ...

So, getting this straight...

1) It's not a government point
2) You have no way of knowing if a contract is signed (and I would guess it's not, else there is no reason to hold this back)

Either one of these 2 kills your argument. 1 is certain, the 2nd is likely.

Did someone swipe your login? This sounds like a hill to die on, which reminds everyone of 1 poster...
 
.-.
pepband99 said:
So, getting this straight...

1) It's not a government point
2) You have no way of knowing if a contract is signed (and I would guess it's not, else there is no reason to hold this back)

Either one of these 2 kills your argument. 1 is certain, the 2nd is likely.

Did someone swipe your login? This sounds like a hill to die on, which reminds everyone of 1 poster...
Expand ...
You’re reading my posts way too technically. I have no clue if it is technically a FOIA violation. But as someone who was around the General Assembly when the bill was passed, I have a problem when a governmental agency gives information to those who pay for it ahead of making it available to all.

That’s it. I’m not dying on this hill because the instant situation isn’t important enough. But do I think it’s right? No. If you do, that’s fine.
 
.-.
I agree this has gotten crazy. I’m sure we are speaking/negotiating with somebody about a 12th game but that could well require us or them or both to make other adjustment, too. I think that is pretty typical.
 
Purple Stein said:
A lot of people know. But no one is allowed to say.

Things are stupid at the moment.
Expand ...
I posted that I'd rather see them play Jax St than Southern Miss - no inside information - just as a topic for debate (pros and cons with either).
 
UCMB88 said:
fbschedules.com has the game 9/19 at Southern Miss.

2026 UConn Football Schedule | FBSchedules.com

09/05 - Lafayette
09/12 - Maryland
09/19 - at Southern Miss
09/26 - at Miami (Ohio)
10/03 - Syracuse
10/10 - at Temple
10/24 - UMass
10/31 - at Air Force
11/07 - North Carolina
11/14 - James Madison
11/21 - Old Dominion
11/28 - at Wyoming
Expand ...
I really like that all our most challenging games are at home. Not writing off any of the road opponents of course, but it’s manageable and sets us up for success
 
UCMB88 said:
fbschedules.com has the game 9/19 at Southern Miss.

2026 UConn Football Schedule | FBSchedules.com

09/05 - Lafayette
09/12 - Maryland
09/19 - at Southern Miss
09/26 - at Miami (Ohio)
10/03 - Syracuse
10/10 - at Temple
10/24 - UMass
10/31 - at Air Force
11/07 - North Carolina
11/14 - James Madison
11/21 - Old Dominion
11/28 - at Wyoming
Expand ...
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,374
Messages
4,568,964
Members
10,474
Latest member
MyStore24


Top Bottom