Men - 2022 UConn Baseball @ NCAA Tournament’s Palo Alto, CA. Super-Regional vs #2 Stanford | Page 28 | The Boneyard

Men 2022 UConn Baseball @ NCAA Tournament’s Palo Alto, CA. Super-Regional vs #2 Stanford

Status
Not open for further replies.
If nothing else, at least holding Stanford scoreless for 7 innings gives our pitchers more confidence going into tomorrow. I feel like we were a little scared from the late game barrage from yesterday and were intimidated today.
Yes, if the game finishes around where it is now, momentum is definitely more even heading into tomorrow.
 
As the announcer said this Stanford team feasts on fastballs and our guys don't don't have electric fastballs. The offspeed stuff from Gallagher, Chudoba, and Sullivan makes them look very ordinary.
 
Walk to start. One batter at a time.
 
.-.
Was far better than that. Great work by some pitchers who have been forgotten as we’ve narrowed our rotation for post season. Sullivan is going to be incredibly important next year.
Strongly agree. All things considered, the bullpen was phenomenal.
 
Bottom 8th, UConn offense with a scoreless inning after a leadoff walk. 8-2 Stanford.
 
If we can hold them here we have all the momentum going into tmrw. We’ve seen pretty much all their pitchers. I like being the away team so we can jump on them early tmrw.
 
Top 9th, Sullivan allows a 2 out single, runner advances to 2B on a Simmons error. Braden Quinn coming in to face a lefty hitter.
 
.-.
I don't like being the away team but it appears that in this series that is an advantage.

The shadows on home plate make hitting very difficult. I will be amazed if we can scratch out any runs in the ninth.
 
Enzo scares me. But maybe try and get one time through the lineup with him.
We will need at least three (somewhat) quality innings from both Enzo and Cooke tomorrow.
 
.-.
Suspect it will be Stefanoni, but I'm sure at the first sign of big trouble Cooke will be getting ready.

Up to now, the UConn weekend starters have not missed a start, which is rather amazing.
It’s not. It’s Cooke.
 
.-.
Petulant.
If you compete your heart out, I can't get upset with you. You are giving your all. That's why I'm defensive of our players even when they swing at bad pitches or make mistakes on the mound.

But acting like a spoiled brat because you're getting knocked around and you don't like the strike-zone is petulant and selfish behavior. Bad for the team in more ways than one.
 
6 pitch walk to start the bottom of the 9th, not really what Stanford wanted.
 
Suspect it will be Stefanoni, but I'm sure at the first sign of big trouble Cooke will be getting ready.

Up to now, the UConn weekend starters have not missed a start, which is rather amazing.
I feel better about Stefanoni today then I did yesterday. These guys aren’t supermen.
 
If you compete your heart out, I can't get upset with you. You are giving your all. That's why I'm defensive of our players even when they swing at bad pitches or make mistakes on the mound.

But acting like a spoiled brat because you don't like the strike-zone is petulant and selfish behavior. Bad for the team in more ways than one.
It was embarrassing and he should be very embarrassed by it. Penders was certainly not pleased. He’s young though…he’ll learn and recover from it.
 
If you compete your heart out, I can't get upset with you. You are giving your all. That's why I'm defensive of our players even when they swing at bad pitches or make mistakes on the mound.

But acting like a spoiled brat because you don't like the strike-zone is petulant and selfish behavior. Bad for the team in more ways than one.
Not trying to automatically defend him here but I need to see the order of events again. I’m sure he said something but most of the childish behavior seems to have come after he was tossed. I just hope it was warranted because otherwise that’s such a terrible move from an umpire.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,326
Messages
4,564,178
Members
10,462
Latest member
Liam Rainst


Top Bottom