I don't think it was that tough. Vic left a loaded roster returning nearly everybody except Danberry. When Carolyn Peck, Gail Goestenkors, Pokey Chatman, and Pat Summitt left... the successors were all at least good the following year. Maybe not Purdue, but Kristie Curry had them back in the National Title game one year later. No way is that happening in Starkville next year.
And yeah, these are not good times for State and one year is particularly damaging in Covid times where the transfer portal is expected to run amok. I don't think we're gonna have McCray for a rebuild though. If we're as bad as I think next year, I believe one of our forum insiders say she's probably done. Hopeful that his claims have merit.
Different circumstances though. Peck and Chatman weren't head coaches who recruited the kids on the returning roster, so the players there didn't pick their school based on the coach. Holly recruited all of the players and they had a brand new lineup with almost all starters graduating. GG I'll give you but they were not close to being the same team under McCallie. They had an undefeated regular season in 2007 and #1 overall seed, and in 2008 had a slew of losses and were a #3 seed. The team was markedly worse.
Roster was loaded, but convincing all those kids to buy into her system after finding a lot of success under Vic is a tough sell IMO. She had no familiarity with the players or the program and was expected to lead them back to be a Final Four contender. It's easier to get players to buy in when they:
1. choose to play for you (none of the players were recruited by McCray)
2. Previously played for a less successful headcoach
3. are projected to take on a larger role in your system
McCray should have done a better job with this group but I dont think it was as great of a situation considering the high expectations and pressure she had to live up to from day 1.