- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,704
- Reaction Score
- 428,091
I like the hire. He didn't do a bad job in Miami.
I guess we will see. I think he learned what not to do in Miami. And Darnold has more potential than Tannehill.He didn't do a good job either. The team never quit during his time here, which he should get some credit for. His play calling was horrific though, and his time management was pathetic. It should also be noted that he hitched his wagon to Ryan Tannehill, and that calls his judgement into question for sure.
I guess we will see. I think he learned what not to do in Miami. And Darnold has more potential than Tannehill.
I like the hire. He didn't do a bad job in Miami.
Everyone in the pool...
CCSU in the market for a new HC as Rossomando heads to Rutgers as OL coach
Interesting read. Gave Walt Bell hiring a C. At 34 he is the second youngest FBS coach.
And after reviewing the coaching hires he tossed in this bonus kick and shove:
Loser -- Rutgers for retaining Chris Ash: The Scarlet Knights retained Ash despite his 1-11 season and a 7-29 record in four seasons. In this age of impatience, it doesn't make sense. Ash is a good coach and fine man, but let's be honest: He is still the coach because Rutgers couldn't afford his $10 million buyout. The athletic department is upside down financially since joining the Big Ten. The school has borrowed heavily from Rutgers' internal bank hoping for a bridge to 2021 when the school gets its first full share in rights fee money from the Big Ten. Ash is only part of the problem.
Loser -- Pac-12: For so many reasons, but let's consider its current commitment to football. The league continued its ongoing streak of 15 straight years without a national championship. Everything from its officials to its spending have been called into question. But if Meyer was a free agent, which he technically is at the moment, how many Pac-12 schools have the money and/or desire to hire one of the best coaches in the game? We're talking at least $8 million in salary a year, but we're also talking about some sort of guaranteed success in exchange for that money. The possibilities: USC? Washington? Maybe Oregon? That's about it.
Interesting read. Gave Walt Bell hiring a C. At 34 he is the second youngest FBS coach.
And after reviewing the coaching hires he tossed in this bonus kick and shove:
Loser -- Rutgers for retaining Chris Ash: The Scarlet Knights retained Ash despite his 1-11 season and a 7-29 record in four seasons. In this age of impatience, it doesn't make sense. Ash is a good coach and fine man, but let's be honest: He is still the coach because Rutgers couldn't afford his $10 million buyout. The athletic department is upside down financially since joining the Big Ten. The school has borrowed heavily from Rutgers' internal bank hoping for a bridge to 2021 when the school gets its first full share in rights fee money from the Big Ten. Ash is only part of the problem.
I didn’t realize that Rutgers doesn’t get a full share until 2021. No wonder Ash is still around.
Loser -- Pac-12: For so many reasons, but let's consider its current commitment to football. The league continued its ongoing streak of 15 straight years without a national championship. Everything from its officials to its spending have been called into question. But if Meyer was a free agent, which he technically is at the moment, how many Pac-12 schools have the money and/or desire to hire one of the best coaches in the game? We're talking at least $8 million in salary a year, but we're also talking about some sort of guaranteed success in exchange for that money. The possibilities: USC? Washington? Maybe Oregon? That's about it.
From huskymedic's linked article:
No worry... he's re-loading: