2018-2019 Coaching Carousel | Page 18 | The Boneyard

2018-2019 Coaching Carousel

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,501
Reaction Score
15,690


Big hit for BC as far as NJ recruiting goes. It will be interesting to see who the dazzler adds to replace him.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,919
Reaction Score
2,723
I wouldn't worry too much, Gase will never win the press conference. Of course he usually doesn't win much on first, second or third down either. I think my favorite Gase moment will be from a game against Buffalo a few weeks back. It's a tight game, Miami is ahead and is on defense. On the field all hell is breaking loose with Miami getting back to back personal foul penalties (lack of discipline is another Gase specialty), the camera cuts to the sideline and Gase is shown sitting on the bench with his head buried in the offensive play sheet. The guy just never learned how to separate being the head coach from being the play caller. Maybe the second go around will work out for him, but I kind of doubt it.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,397
Reaction Score
38,197
Pitt hires Whipple, Maryland hires Montgomery? My visceral reaction = both schools ended up with their third choice. Idk, maybe I just unfairly expect every school to hire some 33 year old wiz kid or at lest some up climbing up the ladder rather than climbing down.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
86,935
Reaction Score
323,081
Newest accepted applicant into the Nick Saban Executive Development and Career Revitalization Program:

 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,397
Reaction Score
38,197

Interesting read. Gave Walt Bell hiring a C. At 34 he is the second youngest FBS coach.

And after reviewing the coaching hires he tossed in this bonus kick and shove:

Loser -- Rutgers for retaining Chris Ash: The Scarlet Knights retained Ash despite his 1-11 season and a 7-29 record in four seasons. In this age of impatience, it doesn't make sense. Ash is a good coach and fine man, but let's be honest: He is still the coach because Rutgers couldn't afford his $10 million buyout. The athletic department is upside down financially since joining the Big Ten. The school has borrowed heavily from Rutgers' internal bank hoping for a bridge to 2021 when the school gets its first full share in rights fee money from the Big Ten. Ash is only part of the problem.


Loser -- Pac-12: For so many reasons, but let's consider its current commitment to football. The league continued its ongoing streak of 15 straight years without a national championship. Everything from its officials to its spending have been called into question. But if Meyer was a free agent, which he technically is at the moment, how many Pac-12 schools have the money and/or desire to hire one of the best coaches in the game? We're talking at least $8 million in salary a year, but we're also talking about some sort of guaranteed success in exchange for that money. The possibilities: USC? Washington? Maybe Oregon? That's about it.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
31,860
Reaction Score
81,477
Interesting read. Gave Walt Bell hiring a C. At 34 he is the second youngest FBS coach.

And after reviewing the coaching hires he tossed in this bonus kick and shove:

Loser -- Rutgers for retaining Chris Ash: The Scarlet Knights retained Ash despite his 1-11 season and a 7-29 record in four seasons. In this age of impatience, it doesn't make sense. Ash is a good coach and fine man, but let's be honest: He is still the coach because Rutgers couldn't afford his $10 million buyout. The athletic department is upside down financially since joining the Big Ten. The school has borrowed heavily from Rutgers' internal bank hoping for a bridge to 2021 when the school gets its first full share in rights fee money from the Big Ten. Ash is only part of the problem.


Loser -- Pac-12: For so many reasons, but let's consider its current commitment to football. The league continued its ongoing streak of 15 straight years without a national championship. Everything from its officials to its spending have been called into question. But if Meyer was a free agent, which he technically is at the moment, how many Pac-12 schools have the money and/or desire to hire one of the best coaches in the game? We're talking at least $8 million in salary a year, but we're also talking about some sort of guaranteed success in exchange for that money. The possibilities: USC? Washington? Maybe Oregon? That's about it.

Interesting takes. Too many A's, too many C's. Not enough B's. Kileman at K-State is a great fit. His ND State teams were very strong, and his same approach will just scale up at K-State. It's what Snyder did as well.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
I still can’t believe brohm stayed at Purdue
 

ShakyTheMohel

Is it 11:11 yet?
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,813
Reaction Score
16,734
Interesting read. Gave Walt Bell hiring a C. At 34 he is the second youngest FBS coach.

And after reviewing the coaching hires he tossed in this bonus kick and shove:

Loser -- Rutgers for retaining Chris Ash: The Scarlet Knights retained Ash despite his 1-11 season and a 7-29 record in four seasons. In this age of impatience, it doesn't make sense. Ash is a good coach and fine man, but let's be honest: He is still the coach because Rutgers couldn't afford his $10 million buyout. The athletic department is upside down financially since joining the Big Ten. The school has borrowed heavily from Rutgers' internal bank hoping for a bridge to 2021 when the school gets its first full share in rights fee money from the Big Ten. Ash is only part of the problem.
I didn’t realize that Rutgers doesn’t get a full share until 2021. No wonder Ash is still around.

Loser -- Pac-12: For so many reasons, but let's consider its current commitment to football. The league continued its ongoing streak of 15 straight years without a national championship. Everything from its officials to its spending have been called into question. But if Meyer was a free agent, which he technically is at the moment, how many Pac-12 schools have the money and/or desire to hire one of the best coaches in the game? We're talking at least $8 million in salary a year, but we're also talking about some sort of guaranteed success in exchange for that money. The possibilities: USC? Washington? Maybe Oregon? That's about it.
 

Online statistics

Members online
582
Guests online
3,535
Total visitors
4,117

Forum statistics

Threads
155,774
Messages
4,031,149
Members
9,864
Latest member
Sad Tiger


Top Bottom