Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 641 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,974
Reaction Score
208,819
Yeah, because the PAC's media partners were so willing to negotiate up with them.....
Apples and oranges. $30 million for West Coast content is decidedly different than $4 million for East Coast content.

One might choose to negotiate with the dealership when buying a $45k car but not try to whittle down the kid next door to see if you can get your lawn cut less expensively.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
All SEC and B1G have to do is pick 4 teams each from the ACC, send a message to those schools that they are in if they get out of the ACC, and it will be done right now.

It will just take some coordination between the B1G and the SEC, and it can happen in a week. I am pretty sure that's next cause no ACC schools want to wait 13 years to see their fate.
Why would the other schools allow them out?
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
1,986
Reaction Score
4,128
I am not sure Cal will be asked to join B10. Stanford might be along with FSU or Notre Dame. I feel bad for Cal because like UConn
it is a university that could offer a lot to conference.
 

RayIsTheGOAT

Sticks, to the rafters
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
2,945
Reaction Score
20,581
Question for the class-

If we had hired Jim Mora 3 years ago, would we have a seat at the table?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
What I am curious about is what is the SEC going to do at this point? They don't play second fiddle to anyone in their minds and the B1G just made a huge play. The SEC has no ability to respond until the ACC GOR expires. And even then, I think that the B1G will be getting first dibs on the ACC teams before the SEC. They are likely going to be stuck taking some combination of Clemson, Virginia Tech, NC State, Duke, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Kansas, etc....hardly the impact that the B1G is going to have.
North Carolina will be SEC.

I'm not as certain about FSU since the B1G has no footprint there, but it's possible they too are SEC.

If the SEC can't take FSU, it would take Clemson.

I still only see 4 football schools leaving + ND.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,061
Reaction Score
130,969
Why do you think that fox will reduce the value of the big East deal? I could see the argument for a nominal increase, or even standing pat, but I can't see it getting reduced.

If you’re a betting man, do not bet on a raise.

I can see Fox saying no, thank you.

The PAC12 just folded because they could not get a linear deal. Fox is cutting expenses and they’ve just added or are about to add a total of eight schools - they have plenty of inventory. And there’s no leverage - ESPN has no room.

A lot has changed since the Big12 signed their deal - Ackerman knows that which is why she said she wanted to renegotiate now instead of down the road. She’s really smart, but this is not a generous game - the networks will give as little as they can.

(E.g. ESPN giving us $1.5M a year in 2012 and their refusal to even consider opening the ACC deal now.)
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,974
Reaction Score
208,819
Kind of like Susie's "We are champions...blah..blah...blah" after we got out maneuvered by Louisville community college for the ACC spot.

Welcome to the MWC Washington State!
Oh, the famous "we are winning winners who win" speech. A landmark in American oratory, right up there with the Gettysburg Address.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,630
Reaction Score
3,232
Why do you think that fox will reduce the value of the big East deal? I could see the argument for a nominal increase, or even standing pat, but I can't see it getting reduced.
Everyone loves a bargain
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,061
Reaction Score
130,969
Seven schools I believe want to break the GOR. How hard is it going to be for their competitors to entice some holdouts to join those seven in a vote to dissolve the conference?

If I had any doubts prior to this week they are now gone.

So you think that these seven or eight schools are dissolve a conference to void a network deal with ESPN and then they are going to just move to another conference and receive more money….from ESPN.

I can explain why this is not going to happen, but it should be pretty apparent to you.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,326
Reaction Score
46,518
They won't, not without a big hefty payday that would make them solvent for 5-10 years thereafter.
I doubt they would even be able to pay that because the remaining schools would all be worried they'd lose their slot in the CFP.

2036 is a long time from now. These schools are assured until then. Why would any President risk their position? Duke and Wake Forest and VT and NC State are looking at Cal and Stanford right now and they're thinking, NFW!

The money the ACC will be making in 5 years is $60m. Overall that's $600m+ to the end of the contract. How in the world are the 4 schools going to come up with that money, especially if it causes all sorts of damage to the remaining schools?

If it were me, I would take that contract until its very end. Oklahoma and Texas negotiated an enormous buyout with 1 year left. It shows you the leverage a school like Kansas St has over Texas.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,811
Reaction Score
9,028
So you think that these seven or eight schools are dissolve a conference to void a network deal with ESPN and then they are going to just move to another conference and receive more money….from ESPN.

I can explain why this is not going to happen, but it should be pretty apparent to you.
Unless the schools leaving the ACC will create more enticing matches in the SEC or the B1G, and ESPN can generate more ad revenue from those matches vs. the ones they got in the ACC.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
952
Reaction Score
4,954
It will just take 8 to dissolve the ACC. Without the ACC, there is no GOR.

I seriously doubt it takes a little over 50 percent to dissolve a conference. If someone wants to leave before the GOR expires, it's going to take half a billion at least.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,789
Reaction Score
15,785
Yes. Randy Edsall 2.0 was one of the worst decisions ever by UCONN admin and AD Dave.
Dave had no money to make a hire and we were stuck in the hell hole of the AAC. He was choosing between a cast of complete fools who were interested in the job. NOBODY of worth wanted the job.

To act like he had his pick of the litter and chose RE for the hell of it is batshit insane.
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
Why would the other schools allow them out?
I thought I had heard a couple of years ago that they would need 75% of ACC teams to vote to dissolve the conference. If that is the case, they would need 12 teams. It would have to be a coordinated attack by the B1G, SEC, and B12 at the same time--and I don't see them all working together on that front. And not sure the teams going to the B12 would agree to it, as there is no financial incentive to dissolve early (as the ACC currently gets more $).

It would have to be something like:

ACC - Notre Dame, UNC, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Florida St
SEC - Clemson, Miami, NC State, Duke, Pittsburgh
B12 - Louisville, Syracuse

While I'd love to see it happen just to see BC screwed, I don't see that happening.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,144
Reaction Score
32,984
So you think that these seven or eight schools are dissolve a conference to void a network deal with ESPN and then they are going to just move to another conference and receive more money….from ESPN.

I can explain why this is not going to happen, but it should be pretty apparent to you.

What is your new favorite program?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,310
Reaction Score
5,300
So you think that these seven or eight schools are dissolve a conference to void a network deal with ESPN and then they are going to just move to another conference and receive more money….from ESPN.

I can explain why this is not going to happen, but it should be pretty apparent to you.
Did you consider that if it was pretty apparent to him he wouldn't have made the post?
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
Dave had no money to make a hire and we were stuck in the hell hole of the AAC. He was choosing between a cast of complete fools who were interested in the job. NOBODY of worth wanted the job.

To act like he had his pick of the litter and chose RE for the hell of it is batshit insane.

His choice was bring back Diaco, or bring on Edsall. Those were his two choices at the time (the boosters would only pay the Diaco buyout and new coach if it was Edsall). While Edsall was a complete disaster, I still don't know if it was better to take on HCRE2.0 or continue with the complete incompetence of Diaco.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,811
Reaction Score
9,028
I seriously doubt it takes a little over 50 percent to dissolve a conference. If someone wants to leave before the GOR expires, it's going to take half a billion at least.
Pretty sure it takes 8 to dissolve the conference. That's 4 each between SEC and the B1G.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,630
Reaction Score
3,232
Wasn’t available, influenced to hire RE. If you think they didn’t have 150k to give to Dunn, you are naive. Didn’t care to.
 

Online statistics

Members online
516
Guests online
3,685
Total visitors
4,201

Forum statistics

Threads
157,025
Messages
4,077,702
Members
9,972
Latest member
SeaDr


Top Bottom