My final thought before I get in my car (and turn on WEEI and not think another second about Andy Gresh): He keeps on referencing Benedict's statement of [paraphrase] "Dominate the conference we are in."
Gresh interprets this as Benedict think UConn is staying in the AAC for the foreseeable future. He also says that UConn is where it is because it is not yet P-5 ready, without regard to outside influences (you all know what they are. I won't list them.).
Finally, what is Gresh talking about UConn's facilities for as if they are DIII level? Gampel is being addressed this summer and the football and basketball practice facilities are state of the art.
On the flip side of the above coin is that Benedict thinks UConn needs to dominate their conference, regardless if they are in the AAC, the ACC, Big Ten, or Big XII. I don't think he is allowed to say any different, lest risk openly pining for another conference, which I don't believe is allowed.
UConn is absolutely a P-5 quality program. They are left out for a variety of combinations of reasons. All of them include the Hathaway/Pasqualoni/APR rate + BC (ACC), Location (Big XII), and endowment/AAU status (Big Ten...My preference). Make no mistake that UConn is ready for the call, and I don't think for a second that UConn did not show the writing on the wall to the de facto day-to-day head of athletics (if not in name) at Auburn University.