I think he does deserve the benefit of the doubt. But will he get it? I'm not so sure, especially if that poster (who, like I said, was right before) is right with those 5 bits of information. Because here's your problem:
Like I said, 2 will be the logic of many in the public post-Paterno, and that might be enough to get him fired.
- He knew about things and covered them up. He's got to go (unlikely).
- He didn't know about things. One of his closest friends molested many children and had many players over his house to bang his wife, and he didn't know. If he doesn't know about these things (particularly the first), what kind of oversight does he have? Ignorance is ignorance. He may have to go.
So do the players banging L. Fine count as them receiving impermissible benefits? Can we say bye-bye National Championship? I know this is no joking matter but I couldn't help myself.