Xavier Post Game Thread

[WNConn]

I will not see you after the St John’s win. You won’t be here. I’ll see you after our next loss, whenever that is

Yeah because St John's sucks lol of course we should beat St. John's. We beat up on the bottom half of the conference. Marquette is the only good Big East team that we've beaten. We got totally embarrassed by Nova, outclassed by Providence in front of a sold out crowd at home, blew it against Seton Hall, and played a totally lifeless game against Creighton. Sure, we beat Auburn, but we shot at an insane percentage and played them before Jabari Smith had any time to develop. It's unequivocally true that we've generally faltered against good competition. I actually find it wild that anyone is arguing against this. It's clear as day to anyone whose head isn't buried in hurleys arse. And I like Hurley. We're just not there yet.

 

[3rdbass]

We aren’t strong enough or skilled enough to prevent physical teams from having their way with us. We are soft.

We are strong enough. The problem is when teams can match up with strength wise we aren't skilled enough to beat them consistently. We need to get more scorers on this team. It always seems a chore to score for us.

 

[wheelerdog]

LOL

We have the 7th best 2pt FG% defense in the country and are 5th in block %.

We don’t get beat at the rim, like a lot.

I would be interested in what that number is in league play.

 

[Rakkasan]

Im in wait and see mode. He’s done incredibly more good than anything negative though

Cope out. I mean, which of us isn't in wait and see? "Incredibly" more good? Really?
How did he do vs AAC talent. Not great.
Last year, in admittedly a bizarre year, he generally won with his 1st rd NBA draft pick and not so much without him. Pretty vanilla given the opportunity and the talent in the BET and the NCAAs.
This year? I think the players are great. Is DH pushing them to maximized potential? Mediocre potential?

So again, "incredibly" more good? Please. We should be so much better than what we are showing.

 

[SwingDog]

Villanova would have won this game by 20. Marquette, providence, seton hall.
Hell, even creighton would have won. Did you not see Xavier had nothing? We were lifeless. That is not the sign of a good team.

Do you mean the same Villanova that lost to Creighton by 20, and to Marquette twice?

 

[navery12]

I would be interested in what that number is in league play.

Opponents are shooting 43% on 2 point FGs in conference play, 2nd best in the conference and we're #1 in the conference in blocks (not sure about block %).

 

[Tenspro2002]

Hurley is 6-25 in games decided by 4 points or less in his first 4 seasons at UConn.

He said, for the most part we beat up on the bottom half of the Big East and generally lose frustrating close games to the good teams in the conference. Marquette is the one exception.

Everything he said is true.

1) Where are you seeing 6-25? That strains credulity.

2) If we have a small lead and push it to 8-10 to win at the end (e.g. vs. Marquette) that seems like a weird development to hold against Hurley.

 

[navery12]

Hurley is 6-25 in games decided by 4 points or less in his first 4 seasons at UConn.

He said, for the most part we beat up on the bottom half of the Big East and generally lose frustrating close games to the good teams in the conference. Marquette is the one exception.

Everything he said is true.

1) Where are you seeing 6-25? That strains credulity.

2) If we have a small lead and push it to 8-10 to win at the end (e.g. vs. Marquette) that seems like a weird development to hold against Hurley.

I checked, it's 6-19 so it's not much better. Looks like he got the 25 total with 25 losses

 

[AntG168]

I checked, it's 6-19 so it's not much better. Looks like he got the 25 total with 25 losses

But I think the question is how many games was it close and down the stretch we put it out of reach? I’d like to know his record in games where the game is within 4 with 2 minutes to play. We still need to win more close games moving forward

 

[WeAreUCONN]

We are strong enough. The problem is when teams can match up with strength wise we aren't skilled enough to beat them consistently. We need to get more scorers on this team. It always seems a chore to score for us.

Hawkins should have played more in the second half. I agree with you that we are somewhat strong enough to matchup with teams but the difference in skill level is the difference. Too many players on this team are not efficient offensively.

 

[Tenspro2002]

I checked, it's 6-19 so it's not much better. Looks like he got the 25 total with 25 losses

OK, but not counted in those "4 points or less" games are 3 overtime wins this year by 6, 7, and 8 points, nor several other 6-10 point wins where, I guess if we played worse down the stretch could have been 4-point wins, but would be incredibly misleading.

If there's a criticism to be had here, it's that we can rarely get over the hump and complete comebacks late in games.

We're actually pretty good at closing out games with small to medium leads.

 

[SwingDog]

We are strong enough. The problem is when teams can match up with strength wise we aren't skilled enough to beat them consistently. We need to get more scorers on this team. It always seems a chore to score for us.

Agreed. When someone steps up on offense like Polley, Jackson, or Hawkins we're a lot more dangerous, but none of those guys are even close to a consistent threat. Tyrese is the X factor (and to a lesser degree, so is Whaley), in my opinion, and tonight he didn't provide enough offensive punch. I think right now, he needs to generate points for us to win, and contributions from any of the aforementioned would be helpful too. I am interested to see Hawkins develop, and what someone else like a Karaban, Diggins, etc might provide next season. It looks like we're a little too easy for teams to figure out at this point.

 

[navery12]

OK, but not counted in those "4 points or less" games are 3 overtime wins this year by 6, 7, and 8 points, nor several other 6-10 point wins where, I guess if we played worse down the stretch could have been 4-point wins, but would be incredibly misleading.

If there's a criticism to be had here, it's that we can rarely get over the hump and complete comebacks late in games.

We're actually pretty good at closing out games with small to medium leads.

Yeah I've wanted to find a way to quantify it for a while and haven't found a good way yet. But I agree it seems like there are a ton of close games we push up into a wider margin of victory. It is 9-19 if we extend to include those OT games which is fair.

 

[SwingDog]

Yeah because St John's sucks lol of course we should beat St. John's. We beat up on the bottom half of the conference. Marquette is the only good Big East team that we've beaten. We got totally embarrassed by Nova, outclassed by Providence in front of a sold out crowd at home, blew it against Seton Hall, and played a totally lifeless game against Creighton. Sure, we beat Auburn, but we shot at an insane percentage and played them before Jabari Smith had any time to develop. It's unequivocally true that we've generally faltered against good competition. I actually find it wild that anyone is arguing against this. It's clear as day to anyone whose head isn't buried in hurleys arse. And I like Hurley. We're just not there yet.

"Outclassed by Providence"? We lost by 4 points. Sure it stung, particularly because they beat us at home, but to say we got "outclassed" is a little ridiculous.

 

[superjohn]

I checked, it's 6-19 so it's not much better. Looks like he got the 25 total with 25 losses

Yep, went through it again and you're right. Not sure how I got to that number. It's still horrible.

 

[superjohn]

OK, but not counted in those "4 points or less" games are 3 overtime wins this year by 6, 7, and 8 points, nor several other 6-10 point wins where, I guess if we played worse down the stretch could have been 4-point wins, but would be incredibly misleading.

If there's a criticism to be had here, it's that we can rarely get over the hump and complete comebacks late in games.

We're actually pretty good at closing out games with small to medium leads.

Hurley is 19-33 in games decided by 8 points or less.

 

[jibsey]

Yeah because St John's sucks lol of course we should beat St. John's. We beat up on the bottom half of the conference. Marquette is the only good Big East team that we've beaten. We got totally embarrassed by Nova, outclassed by Providence in front of a sold out crowd at home, blew it against Seton Hall, and played a totally lifeless game against Creighton. Sure, we beat Auburn, but we shot at an insane percentage and played them before Jabari Smith had any time to develop. It's unequivocally true that we've generally faltered against good competition. I actually find it wild that anyone is arguing against this. It's clear as day to anyone whose head isn't buried in hurleys arse. And I like Hurley. We're just not there yet.

SJ played us tight at our home. No way a blowout.

 

[Okafour rings]

We tend to over-analyze individual games. The truth is that UConn has lost their last 3 of 4 games, and the next 4 games look to be 2-2, possibly 1-3. It's disheartening to see such a veteran team not pull out more close games, and their inconsistent play from game to game lead me to believe that the most to hope for in the tournament is 1 win and then an exit

 

[uconnfan68]

Hurley. Outcoached and outclassed.

The refs are killing his lineups. I’m surprised we kept it close with Cole and Sanogo on the bench for so long.

 

[Orc]

We tend to over-analyze individual games. The truth is that UConn has lost their last 3 of 4 games, and the next 4 games look to be 2-2, possibly 1-3. It's disheartening to see such a veteran team not pull out more close games, and their inconsistent play from game to game lead me to believe that the most to hope for in the tournament is 1 win and then an exit

I really thought that this is the year that Uconn is back to dominating the big east. Now it’s looking like a middle of the pack finish and another “Just happy to be in the tourney” banner

 

[Viet Vet]

Ugh...............ly. Again

 

[Storrs South]

Hurley is 19-33 in games decided by 8 points or less.

He went 3-10 his first year here on a team that had Tarin Smith averaging 28 minutes a game

Bumped up to 7-9 and the following year on a team where Brendan Adams was getting 20+ min/game

3-6 last season, of which 3 of the 6 losses were without their best player

5-6 this season, of which 3 of those 6 losses were not a full strength

I have a bone to pick tonight with sitting Cole and Sanogo as long as Hurley did, but guys also gotta make shots, be smarter with fouling...the close game narrative doesn't really make sense to me. Are really going to penalize the guy for losing close games when Tarin Smith and Brendan Adams were getting heavy run? Or when he was missing his best player? Or when he is missing 2 of his 3 best players?

I'm not saying the guy is the next Calhoun or anything...at least not yet but that stat while may be true it lacks context.

 

[AdamaNation]

The big east is hard

Pretty easy to pick out all the newer or less frequent posters on here. Speaking of the comments above this one. ….tick. Tick. Tick.

 

[AdamaNation]

Regression to the mean

Until they go 11-19 next game.

 

[AdamaNation]

If we're going to be a consistent top 15-type team, 4 seeds and better, buzz around the program, we need to be winning this sort of game like 60-70% of the time. Instead it's more like 30-40%, which leaves us in that sort of ho-hum 20-30 range, 6-7 seed

4 years ago is was none percent of the time.