WVU gone from BE...Slive ( SEC commish) authorized to negotiate with WVU | Page 2 | The Boneyard

WVU gone from BE...Slive ( SEC commish) authorized to negotiate with WVU

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,782
Reaction Score
15,762
Would MU choose a WVU-less BE over the SEC? Not sure about that.
but in this scenario, MU wouldn't have that choice. supposedly, it's one or the other. of course, the "other" could very well be team 15 down the road.
 

UConn4ever

Devil Dog
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,248
Reaction Score
698
If they decide on WVU they would fit right in with their academics or lack there of.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
1,582
Reaction Score
1,846
why ISU?

Agree. Better to take Houston or UCF than ISU, but Providence probably will do it all in haste and just give it to ISU as they are 'linked with KU and KSU'. I have no faith in the BE leadership.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
61
Reaction Score
40
The irony is that Missouri may be electing to join the Big East over the SEC....which will then open up the SEC for WVU.

If WVU does take the SEC offer, they will live to regret the decision. They will become the BCU:ACC of the SEC. They will end up making more money, but their long term on-field success will suffer significantly. Be careful what you wish for...you might just get it.

sorry SportsGuy,

you're absolutely wrong.

WVU competes for the SEC championship the minute they're a member (hope it doesn't happen)

sure, they stack up behind LSU, 'bama, Auburn, FL, but none other, they can stand firm w/ anybody in that conference, and on a good year, compete equally for their championship

they R the BIG east's bell cow, sure hope they stay w/ us...
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,782
Reaction Score
15,762
Agree. Better to take Houston or UCF than ISU, but Providence probably will do it all in haste and just give it to ISU as they are 'linked with KU and KSU'. I have no faith in the BE leadership.
Your backhanded potshot at the BE leadership holds no weight. CUSA schools are 100% irrelevant in all of these discussions, they will be a non-factor. ISU is in no way linked with KU and KSU. Granted, ISU is kind of a non-starter as it is, give me the BCS team over the CUSA morons. I'd argue for Baylor over ISU due to location, more money, and bigger upside than ISU.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,279
Reaction Score
5,130
1. To the credit of the 'Neer fans, their board is not uniformly excited about this. Many, many are responding with thoughts of disliking the SEC, wanting the Big East to grow and keeping the rivalries they have. This is a class fan base, and no amounts of reports of some intimidation of opposing fans is going to easily change my mind on that (but, then again, I was there the week Jazz was murdered so I'm not neutral on this).

2. If Florida, Georgia, Kentucky and South Carolina are really ready to damage the SEC by looking at MIzzou or WVU because they are afraid to elevate FSU, Georgia Tech, Louisville and/or Clemson, respectively, to being an in-league competitor they are all mad. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

3. If this ( the move to 4 16 team conferences) has to happen, and I don't see why it does, would the three conferences driving the bus get on with it already so that everyone can adjust and get back to watching football please? For the life of me, I still don't see what an SEC member gets by expanding. But what do I know.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
500
Reaction Score
190
but in this scenario, MU wouldn't have that choice. supposedly, it's one or the other. of course, the "other" could very well be team 15 down the road.

But seemingly if MU were to consider the BE, they would be going from instability to instability. So long as there are remaining moves on the chessboard, the BE will be at risk.
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
sorry SportsGuy,

you're absolutely wrong.

WVU competes for the SEC championship the minute they're a member (hope it doesn't happen)

sure, they stack up behind LSU, 'bama, Auburn, FL, but none other, they can stand firm w/ anybody in that conference, and on a good year, compete equally for their championship

they R the BIG east's bell cow, sure hope they stay w/ us...

They will compete at the top of the SEC for the first couple of years (as BC did in the ACC for the first couple of years). But in the long term, they will not be able to compete with the other schools. The SEC is a completely different animal than any other conference. They will be the outcast in the conference. Within 5 years, WVU will be battling to get above .500 and make a bowl instead of battling to make a BCS bowl game as they do now.

But I guess that is just my opinion...neither of us can prove our point....time will tell. But I am very confident that WVU's on-field success will suffer significantly (but their bank account will be much bigger).
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
500
Reaction Score
190
They will compete at the top of the SEC for the first couple of years (as BC did in the ACC for the first couple of years). But in the long term, they will not be able to compete with the other schools. The SEC is a completely different animal than any other conference. They will be the outcast in the conference. Within 5 years, WVU will be battling to get above .500 and make a bowl instead of battling to make a BCS bowl game as they do now.

But I guess that is just my opinion...neither of us can prove our point....time will tell. But I am very confident that WVU's on-field success will suffer significantly (but their bank account will be much bigger).

Sure you cannot prove it, but can you say why WVU won't be able to compete long term?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,782
Reaction Score
15,762
BC stoppped competing in the ACC because OBrien left becuase Flipper is a moron, and Jags got fired because Flipper is a moron, and they hired Spaz who is terrible because Flipper is a moron. See the trend here? WVU would probably compete in the SEC, but I can't see them being a consistent powerhouse.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
360
Reaction Score
296
Morgantown is not a Southern town and hasn't been since 1863. Morgantown is 70 miles from Pittsburgh and only a few miles from the PA border. It's not culturally an SEC school and they would, to an extent, be an odd school out
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
Sure you cannot prove it, but can you say why WVU won't be able to compete long term?

I say this only half joking...but the WVU boosters do not have the deep pockets and willingness to break all rules that the established southern schools do (relatively speaking). Alabama, Auburn, Florida, LSU, Texas A&M, Georgia, Tennessee, and the list keeps going on and on. WVU would be a middle-of-the-pack SEC team in 5 years.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
1,582
Reaction Score
1,846
The irony is that Missouri may be electing to join the Big East over the SEC....which will then open up the SEC for WVU.

If WVU does take the SEC offer, they will live to regret the decision. They will become the BCU:ACC of the SEC. They will end up making more money, but their long term on-field success will suffer significantly. Be careful what you wish for...you might just get it.

Not joining a conference because your afraid of the competition. Sorry, but this is a way to make decisions in life. If SEC or B10 invited UConn, I would take it in a heartbeat (ACC not so sure as I don't think they are all that).
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
500
Reaction Score
190
Morgantown is not a Southern town and hasn't been since 1863. Morgantown is 70 miles from Pittsburgh and only a few miles from the PA border. It's not culturally an SEC school and they would, to an extent, be an odd school out

That doesn't make sense to me. Morgantown isn't in Maine. Not much different than KY.
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
Not joining a conference because your afraid of the competition. Sorry, but this is a darn way to make decisions in life.

It is not just the competition. It is culture, beliefs, and priorities. The SEC's are different that everyone else's. I don't believe that WVU will succeed in that culture and situation in the long term. Again, I think WVU would actually compete at the top of the SEC in the short term...so it isn't about talent/competition.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
360
Reaction Score
296
Actually it is a lot different than KY. I spent some time there and in Lexington about 17 years ago when my son was looking at colleges. He ended up at UTenn. in Knoxville. That's a Southern school and it certainly fits the SEC profile. UK does, too, although not quite as much. Anyway, my opinion certainly isn't gospel.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,782
Reaction Score
15,762
not so fast....everyone's favorite mouthpiece chip brown is reporting that part of a&m's acceptance to the sec is contingent on every big 12 school signing a waiver saying they will never sue the sec for this move. could be just more posturing via leaks from the UT administration trying to stick it to aTm, or this could be something. either way, i can't see baylor, KU, KSU, ISU, or just about anyone in the big 12 signing that. also sets a precedent for future expansion, would every big east team have to sign that waiver for wvu? this basically creates a process by which other conference members can block another school from leaving.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,178
Reaction Score
31,627
Baylor's President is Ken Starr. Fat chance they won't sue.

I wouldn't blame WVU one bit. The conference leadership has been pitiful all around. At this point I wouldn't blame anyone for leaving.
 

epark88

Throat's all better now, thanks for asking...
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,283
Reaction Score
1,392
I believe that mentioning WVU is just a ploy to smoke out Mizzou.

Once aTm and the Texoma crew bolt, that would leave five BXII schools to pick up the pieces. There would be plenty of pressure (as well as precedent) to allow the five to reconstitute themselves while keeping their BCS bid. Because of cultural differences, Mizzou may be more inclined to rebuild the BXII (while biding time for an elusive B1G invite) than to lock themselves into the SEC.

Meanwhile Slive & Co. are clearly averse to litigation in all of this, and Mizzou - in addition to bringing a big market and some built-in rivalries - offers the 'path of least resistance' for the SEC. Let's face it, them going after WVU just before the Big East enters contract negotiations would become a major legal issue for them, as well as for ESPN/CBS.

IMHO, they really want Mizzou to get with the program more than anything else...
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,128
Reaction Score
32,924
If WVU wants the SEC invite, they better get it. By entertaining this invitation, they open the floodgates. Pitt, Rutgers, UConn and Syracuse are all better candidates for ACC expansion because of markets and academics.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,178
Reaction Score
31,627
If WVU wants the SEC invite, they better get it. By entertaining this invitation, they open the floodgates. Pitt, Rutgers, UConn and Syracuse are all better candidates for ACC expansion because of markets and academics.

That floodgate is open already.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,536
Reaction Score
44,602
Would MU choose a WVU-less BE over the SEC? Not sure about that.
Makes a lot sense that if the SEC wants Mizzou, and they think Mizzou wants the Big East, that they try to coerce Missouri by saying if you go them "we'll just take WVU, and where does that leave you/Big East.

Oliver Luck has spoken publicly about a stable Big East being a better home for them than the SEC. WVU could in theory, use this to bring the football schools and agree them to sign an astronomical exit fee to get out in the future. Probably wishful thinking
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,846
Reaction Score
9,858
CUSA schools are 100% irrelevant in all of these discussions, they will be a non-factor. ISU is in no way linked with KU and KSU. Granted, ISU is kind of a non-starter as it is, give me the BCS team over the CUSA morons. I'd argue for Baylor over ISU due to location, more money, and bigger upside than ISU.
What is the background for the "CUSA morons" comment? Knowledge, fact, foolishness, or just an opinion? Inadvertently, you make an interesting argument for UCF and even Houston compared with the Cyclones in Ames, Iowa and the Bears in Waco. I'd rather be in a hybrid with some ACC schools or possibly the Big 10, but Orlando, FL and Houston may offer some advantages over back water Ames and small private, non-existent TV market Waco. Tradition versus growth upside? Is that the reasoning, or something else that's less apparent?
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
668
Reaction Score
836
WVU will succeed in the SEC. The AD will promote success, the fans would demand success.

WVU was successful as an independent......and had highly touted recruits that went on to be successful in the NFL. They recruit well from the SE and Texas as a BE member (Pat White, et al) ......don't you think they'll do better as a SEC member? I bet more of the top athletes would rather play for a team that competes against the best as opposed to one that doesn't.

Compared to the other BE programs, the atmosphere at WVU games is really BIG TIME. Most of the time the stadium is packed before games and the fans are cheering sideline to sideline. And they travel very well to bowl games.....no excuses. They will mesh well with any super conference that wants to poach them.

They certainly are (were) a big asset to the BE. But with economic problems nationwide and budgets to state schools being trimmed, who could blame them for going to where the BIG MONEY is going to be. Will they be favored conference champs "every year".......probably not, but they will be consistently competitive.

IF they decide to leave, I wish them the best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
576
Guests online
3,834
Total visitors
4,410

Forum statistics

Threads
156,892
Messages
4,069,537
Members
9,951
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom