Wrong team for KLS? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Wrong team for KLS?

Gabby being asked to play point is being set up for failure. I like Copper, but she's getting more minutes than Gabby, and really can't do as many things as Gabby. The Sky is one of the worst passing teams in the league. Gabby has always shown herself to have great vision and, as a result, has always been a very good passer. Hopefully Gabby will find herself somewhere next year where her unique talents( passing, defense, rebounding) will be more utilized. I expect there's some coach out there who would love to have her.
 
boontonbomber said:
Gabby being asked to play point is being set up for failure. I like Copper, but she's getting more minutes than Gabby, and really can't do as many things as Gabby. The Sky is one of the worst passing teams in the league. Gabby has always shown herself to have great vision and, as a result, has always been a very good passer. Hopefully Gabby will find herself somewhere next year where her unique talents( passing, defense, rebounding) will be more utilized. I expect there's some coach out there who would love to have her.
Expand ...

Copper has played all of 3 more minutes than Gabby this year.

The Sky are 3 in the league in team assist/turnover ratio and 2nd in the league in percentage of made field goals that were assisted. I'm not sure what the basis is for calling the Sky a bad passing team.

Gabby was used as a point guard because Jamierra Faulkner was rehabbing an injury and Gabby was a better option than rookie Chloe Jackson. Expect her to transition to playing on the wing more now that Faulkner is available again.

Gabby's Achilles heel continues to be an unreliable three point shot. Copper is not a great shooter but even at 32% she requires some attention at the 3-point line whereas opponents want Gabby to shoot 3s. Having a wing that can't shoot is a major liability at this level. Amber Stocks tried playing her at the 4 last year but WNBA 4s are big. Gabby can't effectively guard folks like A'ja Wilson and Tina Charles night after night. She's simply giving up too much height and mass.

That's what Gabby is right now - jack of all trades, master of none.

Overall, their effectiveness is pretty comparable so I think Gabby and Kahleah having relatively equal minutes totals makes sense.
 
I was really surprised Chicago took her as high as they did. KLS is a good player but I dont see how she fits in since the Sky already having a very good wing core of Deshields, Quigley and Williams. I thought Collier was a much better fit for the Sky.
 
JoePgh said:
Maybe the fact that the Sky had a positive experience with one intelligent 3-point shooter who had been well coached and well seasoned in college despite not being overly athletic (Quigley) caused them to make a bet on a younger player (KLS) with that same basic profile. And they may win that bet, although probably not this year.

I also disagree about whether Lou can be a 4 in the WNBA. It should be easier for her to improve her upper body strength (needed for the 4) than to improve her speed and quickness (needed for the 2 or 3). Either way, she has to develop physical skills that she does not currently possess.
Expand ...

I don't see her as a 4...nothing about her game tells me she is capable of being an interior player, nor does she want to be one. KLS is plenty athletic to be an exceptional 2 or 3 in the league. She should watch film of JJ Redick in the NBA and emulate how he constantly moves off screens to get good looks. She has the size, quick release and dead eye accuracy to be a great sniper in the W.
 
Orangutan said:
Copper has played all of 3 more minutes than Gabby this year.

The Sky are 3 in the league in team assist/turnover ratio and 2nd in the league in percentage of made field goals that were assisted. I'm not sure what the basis is for calling the Sky a bad passing team.

Gabby was used as a point guard because Jamierra Faulkner was rehabbing an injury and Gabby was a better option than rookie Chloe Jackson. Expect her to transition to playing on the wing more now that Faulkner is available again.

Gabby's Achilles heel continues to be an unreliable three point shot. Copper is not a great shooter but even at 32% she requires some attention at the 3-point line whereas opponents want Gabby to shoot 3s. Having a wing that can't shoot is a major liability at this level. Amber Stocks tried playing her at the 4 last year but WNBA 4s are big. Gabby can't effectively guard folks like A'ja Wilson and Tina Charles night after night. She's simply giving up too much height and mass.

That's what Gabby is right now - jack of all trades, master of none.

Overall, their effectiveness is pretty comparable so I think Gabby and Kahleah having relatively equal minutes totals makes sense.
Expand ...

Copper is also much more a slasher to the basket than Gabby, as she's taken nearly double the amount of Its as Williams (and is 3rd on the team in FTA). Gabby averages double the assists of Copper.
 
Orangutan said:
Copper has played all of 3 more minutes than Gabby this year.

The Sky are 3 in the league in team assist/turnover ratio and 2nd in the league in percentage of made field goals that were assisted. I'm not sure what the basis is for calling the Sky a bad passing team.

Gabby was used as a point guard because Jamierra Faulkner was rehabbing an injury and Gabby was a better option than rookie Chloe Jackson. Expect her to transition to playing on the wing more now that Faulkner is available again.

Gabby's Achilles heel continues to be an unreliable three point shot. Copper is not a great shooter but even at 32% she requires some attention at the 3-point line whereas opponents want Gabby to shoot 3s. Having a wing that can't shoot is a major liability at this level. Amber Stocks tried playing her at the 4 last year but WNBA 4s are big. Gabby can't effectively guard folks like A'ja Wilson and Tina Charles night after night. She's simply giving up too much height and mass.

That's what Gabby is right now - jack of all trades, master of none.

Overall, their effectiveness is pretty comparable so I think Gabby and Kahleah having relatively equal minutes totals makes sense.
Expand ...
ratio skewed by Sloot. 7 players have as many, or more, turnovers as assists.
 
.-.
boontonbomber said:
ratio skewed by Sloot. 7 players have as many, or more, turnovers as assists.
Expand ...
Bad passing team? Well, in watching them play I see a lot of ill conceived passes, leading to turnovers. By that I mean absolutely terrible choices. Sloot gets lots of assists by taking chances, leading to turnovers.
 
boontonbomber said:
ratio skewed by Sloot. 7 players have as many, or more, turnovers as assists.
Expand ...

Well naturally having perhaps the best passer in the league on the team helps you have a good passing team. Just as having the best defender in the league is going to help you be a good defensive team.

To get to 7 you have to count sparingly used players like Faulkner, Ndour, and Jackson.

Of the players who have played significant minutes, you have Sloot, Quigley, DeShields, and Gabby in the positive and Dolson (barely), Lavender, Parker, and Copper in the negative.

Player for player they are an average passing team, but the players who are doing most of the ball-handling are good to great in the passing department.

Dokey said:
Bad passing team? Well, in watching them play I see a lot of ill conceived passes, leading to turnovers. By that I mean absolutely terrible choices. Sloot gets lots of assists by taking chances, leading to turnovers.
Expand ...

Sloot is 6th in the league in assist/turnover ratio (among players who have played 10 or more games). I would say the rewards generally justify the risks she takes.
 
In today’s Courant story Wade confirmed why I thought Sky was a bad fit for KLS—a deep roster. She needs a team that can get her a minimum 15 minutes a game in order to develop.
 
Most players coming into the WNBA face the same issue of whether or not they end up on a team that is right for them. There are so few roster spots that the demand is not on the side of incoming players. KLS has the advantage of being a high pick so she will be allowed a lot of time to produce. Some players end up getting cut and never having the opportunity to prove themselves. For KLS it is a matter of proving herself to get more playing time. For some players, it is a matter of even making the roster. It is very possible, because of the way the WNBA is run, that less talented players might end up on some teams roster while more talented players are cut. It all depends on the team you end up on.
 
willtalk said:
Most players coming into the WNBA face the same issue of whether or not they end up on a team that is right for them. There are so few roster spots that the demand is not on the side of incoming players. KLS has the advantage of being a high pick so she will be allowed a lot of time to produce. Some players end up getting cut and never having the opportunity to prove themselves. For KLS it is a matter of proving herself to get more playing time. For some players, it is a matter of even making the roster. It is very possible, because of the way the WNBA is run, that less talented players might end up on some teams roster while more talented players are cut. It all depends on the team you end up on.
Expand ...
but she needs playing time to prove herself. she can play multiple positions, she knows how to play the game, so Wade has to figure out how to get her minutes. good coaches figure out how to give players breaks, while getting other players minutes. not easy; that's one of the reasons there are so few good coaches . at the moment he's wasting her. KLS was aggressive right away yesterday, yet never saw the court again.
 
Last edited:
.-.
willtalk said:
Most players coming into the WNBA face the same issue of whether or not they end up on a team that is right for them. There are so few roster spots that the demand is not on the side of incoming players. KLS has the advantage of being a high pick so she will be allowed a lot of time to produce. Some players end up getting cut and never having the opportunity to prove themselves. For KLS it is a matter of proving herself to get more playing time. For some players, it is a matter of even making the roster. It is very possible, because of the way the WNBA is run, that less talented players might end up on some teams roster while more talented players are cut. It all depends on the team you end up on.
Expand ...

Case in point - Courtney Williams was selected eighth overall in the 2016 WNBA Draft by the Phoenix Mercury on April 14, 2016. She was traded to Sun 2 months later in June. She could not get a "sniff" of the court during that time. They gave up on her real quick. Now she's a starter for the Sun.

Rookie All-American Brianna Turner is experiencing that same fate in Phoenix. In the 14 games she was dressed for, she's averaging 5 mpg. She's played 18, 11 & 13 minutes the last 3 games, or her minutes per game average would be much less. She's averaging 1.14 ppg. Think she could have got more minutes with another team? :rolleyes:

Collier has played in and started in all 20 of their games. She's played 30+ minutes in 17 of them. As good as Napheesa is, I think there are some teams she could have gone to and spent more time on the bench than on the floor. She got lucky getting drafted by Minnesota. The Sparks, Mystics and Mercury immediately come to mind.
 
Last edited:
If Collier was taken by Chicago, with the 4th pick, would she be getting as few minutes as Lou (not counting for the time Lou lost to an injury).
When Lou got zero minutes in the 2nd game of the year(Skys first home game) you could tell the coach thought game 2 of the season was a must win, at any or all costs. Lou got hurt a game or two later and it has been catch up since. IMO, this coach is playing for his reputation and all the stuff he said on draft day was BS, or he would have used Lou, a lot more. Hard to believe one of the leaders on UConn, and her BB IQ isnt good enough for more minutes.
 
Couple of things: Does everybody agree Napheesa will be behind Maya next year with reduced minutes? Will Maya and Napheesa share minutes next year? Is Maya coming back next year?
I still think Courtney Williams has the same elevation in her jump shot as Diamond, maybe a tad higher.
 
Rixxx said:
Couple of things: Does everybody agree Napheesa will be behind Maya next year with reduced minutes? Will Maya and Napheesa share minutes next year? Is Maya coming back next year?
I still think Courtney Williams has the same elevation in her jump shot as Diamond, maybe a tad higher.
Expand ...
I don't think Maya knows whether Maya is coming back next year. A big reason why she might is that next year is an Olympic year, and she needs to demonstrate that she still has the mojo to make the Olympic team.

If she does, then either Napheesa will play behind her or will get some minutes at the 4, together with Damiras Dantas.
 
ochoopsfan said:
When Lou got zero minutes in the 2nd game of the year(Skys first home game) you could tell the coach thought game 2 of the season was a must win, at any or all costs. Lou got hurt a game or two later and it has been catch up since. IMO, this coach is playing for his reputation and all the stuff he said on draft day was BS, or he would have used Lou, a lot more. Hard to believe one of the leaders on UConn, and her BB IQ isnt good enough for more minutes.
Expand ...

Or perhaps this coach -- James Wade, in his first WNBA HC position -- is going to bring KLS along slowly. Rookies come straight from college to the W, with no time off. There is going to be an adjustment period, but also a rookie wall/burnout period.

Chicago finished 12-22 in 2017 and 13-21 in 2018, under former HC and GM Amber Stocks. After 20 games in 2019, Chicago is 11-9, with largely the same roster (Jantel Lavender was the only major free agent/trade acquisition, outside of KLS and the draft). After allowing over 90 ppg on 46.2 percent shooting (35.2 percent from three) in 2018, Chicago 's defense is surrendering 80 ppg on 41.0 percent shooting (31.7 percent) this year -- a MAJOR upgrade (and again, largely with the same personnel). Though the defense still has a way to go (Chicago is still 11th in PPG surrendered), Coach Wade has his players making the necessary improvements defensively in order to move up the WNBA standings.

There is no entitlement to minutes/playing time in professional sports. Simply because a rookie -- just over halfway into her first season -- is not earning a lot of minutes does not mean that there is something wrong with the coach.
 
Carnac said:
Rookie All-American Brianna Turner is experiencing that same fate in Phoenix. In the 14 games she was dressed for, she's averaging 5 mpg. She's played 18, 11 & 13 minutes the last 3 games, or her minutes per game average would be much less. She's averaging 1.14 ppg. Think she could have got more minutes with another team? :rolleyes:
Expand ...

Fellow rookie Alanna Smith is averaging 7.5 min/game for the Merc. Last year Maria Gulich averaged 5.0 mpg as a rookie for Phoenix before being traded. It appears that is not the franchise to go to if you want a chance to develop as a young post player.
 
.-.
nwhoopfan said:
Fellow rookie Alanna Smith is averaging 7.5 min/game for the Merc. Last year Maria Gulich averaged 5.0 mpg as a rookie for Phoenix before being traded. It appears that is not the franchise to go to if you want a chance to develop as a young post player.
Expand ...

In the past, the three hardest rosters for rookies to make were Los Angeles, Phoenix and Minnesota.
 
Last edited:
Carnac said:
In the past, the two hardest rosters for rookies to make were Los Angeles, Phoenix and Minnesota.
Expand ...

:rolleyes: Los Angeles, Phoenix, Minnesota. 1...2...

I'm reminded of the great Monty Python sketch about nobody expecting the Spanish Inquisition.
 
nwhoopfan said:
Fellow rookie Alanna Smith is averaging 7.5 min/game for the Merc. Last year Maria Gulich averaged 5.0 mpg as a rookie for Phoenix before being traded. It appears that is not the franchise to go to if you want a chance to develop as a young post player.
Expand ...
I watched the Mystics vs Mercury game the other day. And another of the Mercury's game that Turner played a lot in. Turner's playing time was based on how athletic her match up is at the 4. EDD burned Smith a few times, and then she burned Turner a whole lot more in the second half. But Turner is better on the perimeter defending. She was far more effective at staying in front of EDD compared to the other options, but no one was going to stop her that night.

I think the Mercury are going to burn out during the playoffs. They play Bonner and Griner way too much.
 
With two starters out, the three not dropping, and Lou not playing much, I’d say ask to be traded.
 
Reypl21 said:
I watched the Mystics vs Mercury game the other day. And another of the Mercury's game that Turner played a lot in. Turner's playing time was based on how athletic her match up is at the 4. EDD burned Smith a few times, and then she burned Turner a whole lot more in the second half. But Turner is better on the perimeter defending. She was far more effective at staying in front of EDD compared to the other options, but no one was going to stop her that night.

I think the Mercury are going to burn out during the playoffs. They play Bonner and Griner way too much.
Expand ...

Have to disagree. Turner is playing because of injuries.
 
.-.
Of course Napheesa is in a much better situation - injuries, Maya disappearing for the year, she walked into a starting role and has made the most of it.

Lou on the other hand - injured herself, not playing well, on a team that really doesn't need her - she's got a long way to go.
 
EricLA said:
Of course Napheesa is in a much better situation - injuries, Maya disappearing for the year, she walked into a starting role and has made the most of it.

Lou on the other hand - injured herself, not playing well, on a team that really doesn't need her - she's got a long way to go.
Expand ...
Lou hasn’t been on the court enough minutes to judge her play. What I did notice was she was open for the three 2-3 times and was ignored whereas Quigley would have gotten the ball, the Quigley who missed 7 out of 10 shots.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,019
Messages
4,549,911
Members
10,431
Latest member
TeganK


Top Bottom