CTBasketball
Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 10,180
- Reaction Score
- 35,176
I get the whole money issue. We operate at a deficit, so getting the $100M+ would solve a lot of problems with the athletic department. I agree it would solve all of our fiscal problems.Well maybe in 13 years. Let’s see that would be $30M more per year for 13 years…$390M.
Yes, we should take that if given the opportunity.
Maybe I’m being blunt. But I’ve been a ticket holder for a long time for both sports football & basketball. When we went to the AAC, the casual fan just stopped caring. No one cared about Cincinnati, Memphis, Louisville, or Houston. The energy around the programs were way off and definitely didn’t feel right.Just curious, what do you perceive “the mold” to be at this point?
So if we go to the Big Ten do you think people will go crazy for a Northwestern or Iowa matchup like they do for a Providence or Villanova matchup? I would argue that the casual fan does not care. Sure the Michigan, Indiana, and Michigan St games would be cool but they’d be cool like Cincinnati or Memphis games. There’s just no bad blood or history. And people don’t care when that’s not involved.
Anyways my two cents, probably shouldn’t be including emotional thoughts in a fiscal decision, so can definitely be seen as a hot take. I understand that.