uconnphil2016
Head Rat
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2015
- Messages
- 5,504
- Reaction Score
- 18,484
Colombia seems to play kind of dirty
Is that a joke????Colombia seems to play kind of dirty
Because England has been clean, riiiiight...Ref finally has had enough of them manhandling Kane
Well, allegedly the New York ref's "a bit biased".Honestly, to me that was a soft penalty.

so we now witness a bunch of guys raised in a culture where drug cartels rule every aspect of life, acting like it.
He was holding him I agree, but Kane started falling and Sanchez kinda just fell on top of him. IDK, I wouldn’t have given it.Rarely, is it smart to clearly hold, then obviously trip an opponent directly in front of even "a bit biased ref"
He was holding him I agree, but Kane started falling and Sanchez kinda just fell on top of him. IDK, I wouldn’t have given it.
I don't know if you have to go there with it. England has been doing their share of baiting. Watch Kane pull the Colombian defender into that penalty in the box. Definitely not innocent and started it. Unfortunate if the game is decided by it, even if its a mess of a match.
You're right, they are definitely arguing because of Carlos Lehder and Escobar.I don't mean the penalties. I mean the reactions. They all lost their cool. Got several cards just arguing. Stupid. You'd not see the Japanese or Germans doing that.
Yup, specifically referencing the Lingard yellow which had just occurred at that point. On Kane's goal, yep he wrapped around the defender similar to players on most corners. Could have been called, but don't the VAR refs upstairs now quickly review all such goal / penalty scenarios and alert ref on the field further review may be appropriate?I think he was referencing the Lingard yellow. Agree with you though. It should have gone to VAR.
Yup, and Colombia's players might benefit from allowing their captain to do the talkingYou're right, they are definitely arguing because of Carlos Lehder and Escobar.
I LOVVVE it when someone who has never been to a country comments so strongly about it as if they know it. Just stop. Seriously, before you sound even more ignorant than you already do. This might sound harsh but actually it is a very heavy, but friendly suggestion that you quit asap in regards to comments like this.so we now witness a bunch of guys raised in a culture where drug cartels rule every aspect of life, acting like it.
OH yes refs from Canada, USA and New Zealand are not at all biased, get off it man.... So why no ref from Iran, Korea, Nigeria, France, Ghana, Czech repb etc. Almost anywhere. Could you imagine if the refs were from Spain, Ecuador and Peru for this match? Because that is basically what we have but for England. I am sitting next to some British supporters who even admit how odd the ref selection is but shrug their shoulders too. Come on, be objective.Rarely, is it smart to clearly hold, then obviously trip an opponent directly in front of even "a bit biased ref"
To be fair, I don't give 2 hoots which nation wins and your post stating the refs were "a bit biased" was absolutely unclear. Conveniently, you also opted not to clarify and refrained from providing any supporting evidence. Particularly at that point in the game, what were your examples of purported English bias?OH yes refs from Canada, USA and New Zealand are not at all biased, get off it man.... blah blah blah. Come on, be objective.