- Joined
- May 27, 2014
- Messages
- 3,282
- Reaction Score
- 16,474
Seems VAR almost always gives the penalty. It’s getting ridiculous. I’m also not a fan of the offside decision. It’s disecting the exact blade of grass.
what about 2 inches??
Well that was a penalty. But I agree, the offside decisions are getting ridiculous. If it's so close you need stop action frame by frame dissection....let it go. There'll be more scoring, which is a good thing.Seems VAR almost always gives the penalty. It’s getting ridiculous. I’m also not a fan of the offside decision. It’s disecting the exact blade of grass.
That was definitely a foul for the PK. Not a flop at all. Glad Naeher came up big though. (granted it wasn't a well taken PK......and why the hell didn't White take it???? - nice call Phil)That was countered by a very weak PK given to England after a VAR review that was more of a dive than a foul; but, the Naeher stuffed the attempt. Overall, an exciting match.
Totally different game. However, maybe show them some grit and determination.PS - Any chance the USWNT could provide a clinic to the USMNT on how to play soccer?
I think Horan and Lavelle (along with Heath) are the best technical/tactical players on the team. Also, I think Heath (and Morgan too) may have been the focus of most teams defense. Heath seems to draw a lot of double teams. And Morgan got the crap beat out of her by Spain. And they've have some problems getting Heath the ball 1v1. Which I think leaves the LW (Rapinoe or Press) to get more opportunities (i.e. unmarked on the backside).I agreed with both VAR calls.
Glad that the USA has some depth.
When Tobin Heath went out, the USA was missing 2 key players, and yet you can bring in Mewis/Horan, Press and still be highly effective.
I am a bit worried by Dahlkemper's play. She was very shaky.
Although scoring goals is beyond a doubt the most important part of soccer, very little has been said about the weak play otherwise from the LW position, and I'm talking about both Rapinoe and Press. Amazes me that they are often at the right place at the right time, which is the sign of being an excellent player, but when they are on the ball, they have been turnover machines.
Horan and Lavelle have been the stars for me so far.
If 6 inches clearly offside is overlooked...than what about 9 inches, a foot, a foot and a half?
Offside is offside.
Dont know much, but some of the Swedes and the Dutch appeared pretty good
Absolutely true. But USA haven’t always dominated. Didn’t win a WC post-99 until 2015. The difference is there are 4-5 teams with a shot at winning it all where it used to be 2-3 max.The internationals are catching up to the U.S.A. Even if we win this, and we probably will, they are getting closer.
Oh, playing ability? Appeared our Yanks and the Limeys were better skilled and better teams, but no doubt the Swedes can beat the Limeys and the Oranje our Yanks.The internationals are catching up to the U.S.A. Even if we win this, and we probably will, they are getting closer.
Oh, playing ability? Appeared our Yanks and the Limeys were better skilled and better teams, but no doubt the Swedes can beat the Limeys and the Oranje our Yanks.
Strike 2, still not the general appearance of quality observed on the Oranje and Swede rosters
The internationals are catching up to the U.S.A. Even if we win this, and we probably will, they are getting closer.
Well that was a penalty. But I agree, the offside decisions are getting ridiculous. If it's so close you need stop action frame by frame dissection....let it go. There'll be more scoring, which is a good thing.