Carnac
That venerable sage from the west
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
- Messages
- 15,931
- Reaction Score
- 79,000
That said the Aces look really good so far. Nearly 60 at the half (against a good defensive team) with only 1 made 3. They are getting just about anything they want in the lane.
Stewart yes--her senior year she was ridiculously dominant, had won 4 titles, 3 straight POY seasons and the consensus was that she'd likely be the next best player in the world (which she has more than lived up to).
Wilson has been better than most people (myself included) thought. She doesn't have the same all around skill set that Stewart/Parker/EDD have but she's a beast inside on both ends and is much quicker than most opposing centers. I thought she'd be a great pro (maybe in the mold of Tina Charles) but didn't expect her to be as good as she's been. Having really good teammates helps a lot too.
Parker coming out of college most predicted would be one of the best ever. No one her size ever showed the overall skill, size and athleticism she brought to the table and she was a top player for team USA at the world championships when she was just a sophomore. She's had an all time great career but in some ways I think we were robbed of seeing her at her peak due to her not being fully healthy from 2009-2011.
Griner similarly had a ton of hype entering the pros. Similar to Parker, no one had the combination of size and mobility that BG possessed at 6-9. She was the most dominant post defender of all time and improved leaps and bounds offensively while at Baylor. She appeared on a great trajectory in Phoenix winning a title her second year but she never evolved into a Wilt Chamberlain type presence that I thought she would and Phoenix has largely underperformed during her tenure there.
EDD there wasn't as much hype on due to lack of exposure in college, but the league was incredibly excited for the "Big 3" of her, Griner and Diggins-Smith. I don't recall how people projected she'd do as a pro, but I think most thought she'd be a great player (which she's lived up to). Coming out of HS she had an insane amount of hype before experiencing burn out and taking a year off to play volleyball.
Aja Wilson has always looked like the transformational player she is today. She was playing wing sometimes in highschool at 6'5 and in college led a team that lost her All American and All SEC center right before entering the NCAAS to a championship with no backup player to assist her. She may have manifested herself later that Stewie due to Stewie having more talent surrounding her in college at the time but even during high school and college she continued to dominate in international tournament with U19, and Pan Am teams, so I would say I figured she would be one of the best players in the worldStewart yes--her senior year she was ridiculously dominant, had won 4 titles, 3 straight POY seasons and the consensus was that she'd likely be the next best player in the world (which she has more than lived up to).
Wilson has been better than most people (myself included) thought. She doesn't have the same all around skill set that Stewart/Parker/EDD have but she's a beast inside on both ends and is much quicker than most opposing centers. I thought she'd be a great pro (maybe in the mold of Tina Charles) but didn't expect her to be as good as she's been. Having really good teammates helps a lot too.
Parker coming out of college most predicted would be one of the best ever. No one her size ever showed the overall skill, size and athleticism she brought to the table and she was a top player for team USA at the world championships when she was just a sophomore. She's had an all time great career but in some ways I think we were robbed of seeing her at her peak due to her not being fully healthy from 2009-2011.
Griner similarly had a ton of hype entering the pros. Similar to Parker, no one had the combination of size and mobility that BG possessed at 6-9. She was the most dominant post defender of all time and improved leaps and bounds offensively while at Baylor. She appeared on a great trajectory in Phoenix winning a title her second year but she never evolved into a Wilt Chamberlain type presence that I thought she would and Phoenix has largely underperformed during her tenure there.
EDD there wasn't as much hype on due to lack of exposure in college, but the league was incredibly excited for the "Big 3" of her, Griner and Diggins-Smith. I don't recall how people projected she'd do as a pro, but I think most thought she'd be a great player (which she's lived up to). Coming out of HS she had an insane amount of hype before experiencing burn out and taking a year off to play volleyball.
Dorka competed hard and did well. Diamond Miller was the star tonight, hugely impactful on both ends and had some impressive shots. Her + Collier make a great tandem and are fun players to watch.In the late game, Diamond Miller had a career high 25, and Minnesota continued their winning streak. Phee had 16/9/3/2 against Turner. Dorka had 6/6/2/3/1 against Griner. She never played against a 6'9" player in college.
Mo had 14/4/7/2. Diana had 7/2/5.
She put up big numbers, but they weren't good. She left, EDD came back from injury and they were MUCH better. Pretty obvious that if you can have either EDD or Charles, you take EDD.'Wait 2021 while on the Mystic she lead the lead in scoring about 24 ppg and average 10 rpg. When she got to Phonix they haven't been good for a while. Landed in a bad situation
Re: Minnesota:Dorka competed hard and did well. Diamond Miller was the star tonight, hugely impactful on both ends and had some impressive shots. Her + Collier make a great tandem and are fun players to watch.
Phoenix competed well but just had too many TOs and had focus/attention lapses. Not their year.
I didn't expect them to be at this level. I figured that they would be good. There are so many factors that come into play when, players that were ELITE in college, and we are thinking that they are going to do great things in the pros and then they get to teams that drafted them and the team dynamic comes into play; coaching, front office, style of play, and the roster, and then those ELITE college players don't take that step to the next level when they get to the pros. Stewie and A'ja are really doing great things.Here’s a question I’m curious about from the board. When Stewie and A’ja were coming out of college, did you expect them to become the (general consensus) top two players in the league? I didn’t start following ball until ~2016 so didn’t have a frame of reference like when EDD, Griner, Parker came out.
Not a snub per se, but Ionescu (15.3 ppg/38% overall) is slightly behind Rhyne Howard (16.5 ppg/43%) and Marina Mabrey (15.9 ppg/42.3%) in both scoring and FG%, but she had that recent tear in scoring that probably helped. Plus, the Liberty have a winning record, while the Sky and Dream are just south of .500 and she's, well, Sabrina. Still, Parker and Gray (for Atlanta) deserve the nods. Copper's been a bit inconsistent for the Sky...will be really interesting to see what happens now that Wade is gone.The All Star reserves have been announced. No real surprises. Not sure who might be considered a snub.
I expected Stewie to be as good as she was. As noted, she was dominant in college -- take it from a Domer who watched some very good ND teams fall short of NC's primarily because of Stewie. There was no answer for a player who could play in the frontcourt, mid-range and bomb away. And had the Clutch gene. Stil does, while the skill set has become even more well-rounded.Here’s a question I’m curious about from the board. When Stewie and A’ja were coming out of college, did you expect them to become the (general consensus) top two players in the league? I didn’t start following ball until ~2016 so didn’t have a frame of reference like when EDD, Griner, Parker came out.
Minnesota, 3 wins in a row!! This was one their best defensive games of the season. They were were getting deflections left and right! Which created a lot of their offense. Get out into the open court and push the tempo. I agree. This was Diamond's game tonight. Since coming back from her injury, she has decided to up the aggression and play at a faster tempo. In the post game interview she mentioned how being on the sideline, it allowed her to view the game differently than we she was on the court. We shall see but it also speaks volumes about her as a player.Re: Minnesota:
- Agree that this was Miller's game tonight. Phoenix really had no answer for her athletic ability on either end of the court.
- Rachel Banham had one of her good games, shooting 4-6 from the field and 4-5 from the FT line.
- Steady as it goes: Lindsay Allen didn't shoot well, but scored 8 pts., dished out 8 assists and only had one turnover.
As per Phoenix:
- BG was BG and thought MoJeff had a really solid game.
- Like you said, 22 turnovers for Phoenix. Minnesota apparently didn't take a huge advantage of it, but that just throws off whatever rhythm they might've had. They played hard, but more in fits and starts.
and made it MUCH worseWait 2021 while on the Mystic she lead the lead in scoring about 24 ppg and average 10 rpg. When she got to Phonix they haven't been good for a while. Landed in a bad situation
So who would you have chosen instead of her? The reserves are coaches selections. Based on her play the last couple years, her numbers have been consistent or better in some areas.I disagree that there’s a lot of talent spread around the league, I mean Cheyenne Parker is an all star for crying out loud. The problem is there’s a lot of talent concentrated in a couple of places, which leads to a handful of great teams and then a bunch of mediocre to and basketball everywhere else.
And it’s not that there isn’t a lot of great players that come into the WNBA but the league isn’t set up in a way to develop talent consistently, so if you aren’t ready NOW your really on you own. I’m not sure any professional league squanders talent the way the WNBA does tbh.
That’s the point… there weren’t any significant subs but there is nothing about Parker’s game that is all-star worthy. She’s a solid WNBA starter but the bar is too low for all-stars in this league .So who would you have chosen instead of her? The reserves are coaches selections. Based on her play the last couple years, her numbers have been consistent or better in some areas.
BG/Turner has a lot to do with the Mercury game performance. But this past game has to do more with teammates finding her when she's open. Only 5 FGA for one of your better players is crazy. Props for Elizabeth Williams for putting in a better effort defensive effort this time around. The lack of selflessness on the Fever will continue to be their downfall.Chicago has gone back to winning, now Indiana is on a losing streak. Did Boston wear herself out in those back to back games w/ Vegas? Her numbers are way down the last several games since then.
No EDD for Washington today, they lost and are just about down to the middle of the pack now. It's separated into the top 3 instead of the top 4 I'd say.
Can the Fever and Sky play all the time?Indiana comes back from 14 down to tie Chicago -- largely behind Kelsey Mitchell's 26 points and NaLyssa Smith's 27 -- but Courtney Williams hits the final two of her 28 points with 16 seconds left and the Chicago Sky win, 89-87, in Indy.
Williams, who also had 8 assists, was ably supported by Marina Mabrey and Elizabeth Williams, who both had 17, and Kaleah Copper, who finished with 15. Mabrey also had six assists.
First game --and first win -- for interim head coach and general manager Emre Vatansever, who took over for James Wade, who left to join the Toronto Raptors as an assistant coach. I watched most of the second half and the sideline procedures looked much the same, save for the coach in the center of the huddle.
I can see an argument for Rhyne or Marina over Sabrina or Copper.Not a snub per se, but Ionescu (15.3 ppg/38% overall) is slightly behind Rhyne Howard (16.5 ppg/43%) and Marina Mabrey (15.9 ppg/42.3%) in both scoring and FG%, but she had that recent tear in scoring that probably helped. Plus, the Liberty have a winning record, while the Sky and Dream are just south of .500 and she's, well, Sabrina. Still, Parker and Gray (for Atlanta) deserve the nods. Copper's been a bit inconsistent for the Sky...will be really interesting to see what happens now that Wade is gone.