By the way, is everyone pulling for BC or against? That's a tough one, you don't want them possibly getting a host over us, but playing at BC as a host wouldn't be a bad backup plan to us not getting a host. Close proximity and we know we can beat them at their place.
If you took away the teams' names on the RPI list and just had Team A, Team B, etc., and stacked them up not knowing who is who it's not a gimmie (under the losing 2 in a row this week scenario). If you think it's a lock you're biased (plus listening to so-called "experts) which is ok we all are. "Combined Q1 and Q2" is not a metric. Otherwise, they would combine it. The committee isn't (or shouldn't be). No drama at all. Last year won BE reg season/tourney RPI ~25 and got a 3 seed. Need to face the hard facts.Good God, such drama. Can't we find the easy middle ground between "the Big East is being cheated" and "the Big East is so bad we're not a look for the tourney if we don't win the conference?" There is no bias in the RPI. No one computer formula is the only way to objectively compare teams, but it is what it is and it's not unreasonable or it wouldn't be so heavily relied upon. Which mean that no one in the Big East other than us has earned it's way into the tourney, and our winning percentage, combined with our record against combined Quad 1 and Quad 2, has already played us in.
I want to win the tournament because I want the players to win championships. But I'm not worried about getting into the NCAAs either.
Last edited:
