The American Athletic Conference Needs to Expand
Suggesting Nova and Georgetown upgrade to FBS? For real?
Although the idea of bringing Nova and Georgetown into the fold sounds sexy, what if they get good enough at football that they get invites to the B1G or ACC instead of us?If Nova and GTown were both serious in upgrading their football, they would make much more sense. Nova was at one point in time series about it anyways. They would both bring very strong olympic sport brands and natural rivals for us and others (temple, etc.). The fact that they would be lower tier football teams would likely only be temporary.
Wichita State, while seemingly bringing a currently good bball team, would not being anything else in a bball-only move, and they are one bad season from becoming Tulsa as others have mentioned.
Finally, they don't fit the Aresco large market model, which was supposed to be the driver behind the next tv contract. It makes us better in bball, but only temporarily...
Although the idea of bringing Nova and Georgetown into the fold sounds sexy, what if they get good enough at football that they get invites to the B1G or ACC instead of us?
Hopefully, the dirty ACC rumor turns out to be true and we don't have to worry about any of this.You are talking about an 8 to 10 year look out. I can't even predict how many conferences there will be in that time-frame, much less who will be in them. And if we can't get our $#it together in another decade of football, we probably don't deserve the invite anyways...
It seems extremely short sighted. What happens when Marshall leaves? More dead weight in the conference? More mouths to feed? I don't get it.I haven't been one of the biggest supporters of UConn to the Big East, but this move would change that in a hurry.
Wichita State is a nothing addition.
Anyone who gets excited about this one way or the other just is not paying attention.
Is Wichita a good addition? No. Are they a bad addition? No.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter that they are a small market because the American has no way to monetize a larger market. It doesn't matter if they're one more mouth to feed; the difference per team is meaningless.
There is no one else out there. If Wichita joins and they earn some NCAA credits fine. If they don't, they'll fit right in. At least we'll play in a full building for a change.
But in the end, it doesn't matter. It won't affect anything.
It seems extremely short sighted. What happens when Marshall leaves? More dead weight in the conference? More mouths to feed? I don't get it.
Before we jump in without thinking and add Wichita State, I think we need to assess all possible additions.
There might be some other schools that have football that might be interested in joining just in basketball. We might want to consider UMass. They have been wanting to join a long time. And let's not forget East Carolina. We are always hearing East Carolina whining about finally getting their chance to join. We could bring in East Carolina in basketball only. Then, in a few years, after schools leave or get kicked out (Temple), we might add East Carolina as a full member. It would be a good deal for a school like East Carolina because they would just need to bide their time and eventually they might get to be a full-fledged member.
Before we jump in without thinking and add Wichita State, I think we need to assess all possible additions.
There might be some other schools that have football that might be interested in joining just in basketball. We might want to consider UMass. They have been wanting to join a long time. And let's not forget East Carolina. We are always hearing East Carolina whining about finally getting their chance to join. We could bring in East Carolina in basketball only. Then, in a few years, after schools leave or get kicked out (Temple), we might add East Carolina as a full member. It would be a good deal for a school like East Carolina because they would just need to bide their time and eventually they might get to be a full-fledged member.
Anyone who gets excited about this one way or the other just is not paying attention.
Is Wichita a good addition? No. Are they a bad addition? No.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter that they are a small market because the American has no way to monetize a larger market. It doesn't matter if they're one more mouth to feed; the difference per team is meaningless.
There is no one else out there. If Wichita joins and they earn some NCAA credits fine. If they don't, they'll fit right in. At least we'll play in a full building for a change.
But in the end, it doesn't matter. It won't affect anything.
WTF! Thanks for your interest in UCONN Sports!Before we jump in without thinking and add Wichita State, I think we need to assess all possible additions.
There might be some other schools that have football that might be interested in joining just in basketball. We might want to consider UMass. They have been wanting to join a long time. And let's not forget East Carolina. We are always hearing East Carolina whining about finally getting their chance to join. We could bring in East Carolina in basketball only. Then, in a few years, after schools leave or get kicked out (Temple), we might add East Carolina as a full member. It would be a good deal for a school like East Carolina because they would just need to bide their time and eventually they might get to be a full-fledged member.
I'm not sure anyone chimed in on this the first time- would VCU be a better addition than Wichita St?
If you're claiming that UConn and East Carolina are equivalents, you're just wrong. Market size and athletic department budget is enough to end the conversation. Also, not sure you're aware but Edsall manufactured a successful football team for a while. Who says he can't do it again? Go ahead and add Wichita State, I don't care. But don't pretend like every school in this conference has something to offer. The second UConn or Cincinnati leave, the conference is officially dead. Imagine how much ESPN or FOX will pay to broadcast those games!Everything is a nothing addition in this league. I mean .
The run down in this conference is basically this:
The good basketball schools are a burden to the good football schools.
The good football schools are a burden to the good basketball schools.
All of whom will make a half-ass commitment to beefing up their weaker programs - but with the lack of exposure, it's a pipe dream. A fruitless, expensive, stupid pipe dream.
I mean I laugh my face off reading people being down on adding Wichita State because their coach will leave and they'll be nothing. WTF do you think your football program is? Valuable? A desired destination by denziens of accomplished, grizzled pros? No. It's a place for P5 cast off coaches to settle in for a while before getting an undeserved second crack or for up and coming coaches to take a coffee break before taking a P5 job. That's this whole conference in the two major sports. That's just the reality of all of it. Does anyone honestly think that South Florida or UCF is sitting there saying to themselves 'UH OH UCONN HIRED RANDY EDSALL, HERE THEY COME.' Of course they're not! And travel expenses? I'm sure the entire rest of the conference - mostly nestled in the Midwest and South - LOVE sending their olympic sports all the way to butt-fk Connecticut for women's diving. We're the biggest burden on anyone in this conference in that regard.
So i'm just tired of hearing it. If this makes basketball a little more enjoyable for the short period of time between us being here and leaving here - wherever that leads - whether that's a pipe-dreamy P5 bid which I don't think is ever going to happen or the more likely 'we let football float into space' while heading to the new Big East... then fine. I'll live with it.
Would it be for 17-18 or 18-19?No car wash story to spice it up, but to my knowledge this is a done deal, in the legal paperwork stages. No comment on whether I like it or not.
Was not informed of that aspect, but I highly doubt everything is ready for this coming season, both on the AAC's end and WSU with the MVC, my money is on official announcement by year's end and with official entry the following year.Would it be for 17-18 or 18-19?