Everyone on the "anti-Ollie development" train keeps pointing to our rich history of developing players, and how Ollie has failed ...
I don't disagree with a lot of the points, but the problem is, even if true, that means he's failed on a few recruits, a few recruiting classes, which some had asterisks as far as sanctions, etc...
So ALL of Ollies recruits are ___, and ALL of Ollies big men are ___, and How many of Calhoun's were ___ .... Well, you're comparing 30+ years of hall of fame coaching and program building vs the first 5 years replacing a hall of famer...
The sample sizes and examples are quite different and make the analogy a BIT skewed...