We don’t need them for offense…we need their DIf you told me right now these two would combine to average 12ppg I would take it in a heartbeat
We don’t need them for offense…we need their DIf you told me right now these two would combine to average 12ppg I would take it in a heartbeat
We wish that too.I really wish when we ignored people they could also not see our posts anymore.
My heart is warm.During the post game interview with the media Hurley indicated they would like to give Ross 12-17 minutes and if he could make threes up to 20.
I’m going to sound like HW but if Ross is asked to remain stationary on one or the other wings while the other players are running various plays and ignoring him it’s unlikely he’s going to get over the hump. He’s a kid that by nature defers. This would have been a good game for the staff to give him a green light to shoot threes given that if he missed them he would have looked like the rest of the team.
Well he needs to learn to adapt. He's not remotely good enough offensively for us to be running plays on offense for him. If you want to tell me he's our defensive stopper and that's why he's getting minutes I'm skeptical but sure. But every minute he's on the court he's the 5th option on offense and he needs to learn to adaptDuring the post game interview with the media Hurley indicated they would like to give Ross 12-17 minutes and if he could make threes up to 20.
I’m going to sound like HW but if Ross is asked to remain stationary on one or the other wings while the other players are running various plays and ignoring him it’s unlikely he’s going to get over the hump. He’s a kid that by nature defers. This would have been a good game for the staff to give him a green light to shoot threes given that if he missed them he would have looked like the rest of the team.
Do you still believe that he will play Zero minutes and that Furphy will get more playing time? If not, what changed your mind? Im not the kind of poster who likes to argue and demean other posters so this is not meant as a troll. I'm pretty sure you said he would be last man on bench. Do you still feel this way?Well he needs to learn to adapt. He's not remotely good enough offensively for us to be running plays on offense for him. If you want to tell me he's our defensive stopper and that's why he's getting minutes I'm skeptical but sure. But every minute he's on the court he's the 5th option on offense and he needs to learn to adapt
Scarily, I'm on the pro-Ross side of the fence this season as a defensive specialist. It's what this team needs.People “coming for receipts” over a preseason article hoping Ross provides a jolt is funny.
Some people were talking about him being a major piece last year or 2 years ago. If he’s a viable bench piece giving 10-15 minutes a game and providing D and energy, that’s awesome.
It’s also not exactly chest pumping, receipt collecting worthy. But hey, it’s the Boneyard.
We’re all hoping Ross can provide a jolt. His athleticism would make that possible. So far, in 2 years, the nuances and the mental aspects haven’t shown. It’s wild to criticize fans of a team for not having blind faith in a player to become great when he hasn’t shown it. No ones rooting against the dude.
Running a few set dunk plays early in the game would be great for his confidence and maybe let him play more freelyScarily, I'm on the pro-Ross side of the fence this season as a defensive specialist. It's what this team needs.
It wouldn't be a bad idea to get him more proactively involved offensively in the early season. Love the idea of using him in the Castle/AJx mold when games should be a cakewalk.
I said him and Furphy would both get 0 minutes and I still feel the same way. I think they're both on the outside looking in when the rotation is cut to 8 come conference play. I just don't see what either of them bring that sets them apart from the top 8 guysDo you still believe that he will play Zero minutes and that Furphy will get more playing time? If not, what changed your mind? Im not the kind of poster who likes to argue and demean other posters so this is not meant as a troll. I'm pretty sure you said he would be last man on bench. Do you still feel this way?
Scarily, I'm on the pro-Ross side of the fence this season as a defensive specialist. It's what this team needs.
It wouldn't be a bad idea to get him more proactively involved offensively in the early season. Love the idea of using him in the Castle/AJx mold when games should be a cakewalk.
Its invalid to trash these kids and justify it by saying "I'm not anti Ross because clearly we want all our players to play well" We live and die by this team, and of course everyone wants every player to succeed. harshly judging a kid and then celebrating his successes because it pleases our fandom is not a marker of high character. It's legal, and it's allowed, but its not to be defended.That's not scary.
People aren't anti-Ross or pro-Ross, despite what HuskyWarrior wants everyone to think.
We mostly came at his wild takes, not necessarily Ross.
Also, HW tends to say things in a definitive way then uses interesting argument techniques that rub people the wrong way. So then it becomes a back and forth and it seems like 1 guy is pro-Ross and the other hates him. That's not usually the case. We all want him to succeed, he was a decently rated recruit from a great HS program with serious athletic talent. We don't want him to fail. We just hadn't seen evidence that he'd succeed to the degree necessary.
What has been said? I haven't seen anything said about him personally, everything is about his game and lack of production so far. Everyone is rooting for him, we all want to win and we want all the players to succeed.There have been some things said about Ross and other players that are pretty over the top critical and ill natured. Just because it's the majority consensus doesnt make it acceptable. Im pretty certain that hurley, his wife and the players read the BY. He basically says so in his book. And UConn fans, who live and die by this team, would scuttle away with their tail between their legs if they were ever taken to task for some of their comments.
If we can’t discuss the effectiveness of players why are we here? If someone isn’t playing well or makes mistakes is pointing that out trashing a player??? Is pointing out Ross played poorly in the first half ok? Or is that trashing? Can we only talk about his second half?Now that you're here, i actually think that you, among the frequent posters, critique these kids in a way that doesnt sound arrogant and demeaning. And of course nobody is trashing his character. That would be silly.
But wanting any player to succeed is due to our investment as fans not some altruistic gesture. I've never met a fan of any team who wants one of their players to crap the bed. It's a self-serving gesture to root for him, not a magnanimous one.
Its invalid to trash these kids and justify it by saying "I'm not anti Ross because clearly we want all our players to play well" We live and die by this team, and of course everyone wants every player to succeed. harshly judging a kid and then celebrating his successes because it pleases our fandom is not a marker of high character. It's legal, and it's allowed, but its not to be defended.
100% I wasnt referring to you by any means. There is some very good player critique on here: stuff i actually rely on. But I am increasingly more and more convinced, especially after reading Dan Hurley's book, that players-coaches-and wives read the BY. I mean, it's only here and X, in terms of Husky bball chatter (Storrs Central being mostly positive)I agree with all of that - I don't believe I've ever trashed him or any of our players, that's not my style. I agree with you that it's not great tact.
I do, however, think sometimes guys have opinions on a players' game and it gets read on an internet board like "trashing."
So I'll say for me, I don't think I've trashed a kid like Ross and I mostly saw people picking apart his game vis-a-vis HW611 and his boisterousness. But we agree these are kids and mostly good kids and players who deserve not to be taken down personally.
I don’t post on social except for here so I don’t know what folks said. Considering how poorly Am played I didn’t think this place was overly critical. He was a major disappointment and a big reason our season wasn’t what we expected. Sorry if you think that’s trashing a player.You're telling me no BYers are ever ruthless and cruel after a poor performance? I agree with you on all you said. But come on. Hurley even said in his book that Mahaney was effected by some of the things uconn fans said about him on social media.
I think this narrative comes from his analytics score defensively which I’m confused by. I’m working on a film breakdown that highlights his defensive possessions throughout the season currently.He looks like he could be a great defender who could provide us much needed versatility defensively and athletically but he was actually probably our worst defender last season.