People are being emotional and thus unnecessarily harsh toward other schools in the league. At the end of the day is no one from the AAC's fault that yesterday's decision/vote went the way it went.
UConn just has to keep grinding and turn in a year or two like Houston this past year or UCF had a few years ago and put the country on notice that our FB team can be great, and get to an upper level bowl with a record indicative of that.
Don't think this thread is born out of a feeling that it's anyone in the AAC's fault that the vote happened yesterday the way it is, but it's the new reality of the college landscape.
A major reason why Tulane, Tulsa, ECU and Navy were added after Louisville and Rutgers bailed and SDSU and Boise announced they weren't coming was to get membership to 12 for the express purpose of hosting a championship game. Aresco was very clear about that from the beginning. Being a TV guy he recognized the value of a championship game.
Now that we could have that game without 12 members, I don't think it's wrong to see some of the programs in the conference as dead weight.
It would actually be in UConn's best interest to dump two of Tulsa, Tulane or ECU. Not only are you getting rid of RPI poison in basketball but you'd be saving hundreds of thousands in travel expenses annually.
All that said, this is a hypothetical dream world that will never actually happen, so don't take it too seriously.