Where we're at without Westbrook | The Boneyard

Where we're at without Westbrook

Tonyc

Optimus Prime
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,140
Reaction Score
43,152
Just thinkin over the holiday weekend as I sit here with a bad cold. If Westbrook was eligible where we would be? Well she averaged 14 pts a game last season so that would take care of our 5th starter averaging double digets but lets look at the other side. Everybody else might see limited time and would not be developing like they are now. We are undefeated and we wouldve still been undefeated. Having Mak Griff Molly Kyla and the rest being developed I think is the better senario. Westbrook most likely wouldve made a difference in the big games like DePaul SC Baylor Oregon. However if everybody else continues to get better I think we are better off in March and next season.

So looking ahead to next season. Dangerfield Irwin Adebayo and Bent graduate and Westbrook can play and everybody has experience and knows the system. So next season we have an experienced bench. We only have to replace Dangerfield in the starting lineup. We also have a big class coming in that will need to gain experience. Geno will be able to play them without concern as we will be 7-8 deep with experience. Thats huge. Just like this season our incoming class next season will need time to learn they system and be developed. We should be good enough next season as not to have to worry about that. Next years freshman class will be able to play without the pressure this years class is experienceing. IMO we will be the team to beat next season and beyond.
 
I don't think Evina would have eaten as many minutes as suggested. There would be more balanced rotation and between CW, CD and Anna although I suppose Anna with her cold shooting start may have had a harder time righting the ship and her minutes would be a bit less. I think Kyla and Aubrey would have been about the same. Only Molly would be greatly affected
 
Things happen for a reason. I never thought Westbrook's waiver would be approved. With only 9 players on roster, this team cannot absorb any long term injuries to its starters, especially Liv. The reserves are forced to step up this season. Absolutely no room for cheerleaders on this year's team. Everyone plays, everyone contributes. Everyone will be counted on to contribute something every night. Molly has already had to start a game this season. It may not be her last depending on how Chrystal's back holds up.

UConn only plays 4 games in December - @Seton Hall (5th), Notre Dame (8th), @DePaul (16th) and Oklahoma (22nd @Mohegan Sun Arena).

This leaves plenty of time for everyone to get healthy, to work on individual and team deficiencies at practice, and going home for the holidays before beginning conference play. UConn won't reach the halfway point of their schedule until January 14th (game #15/29) @ Memphis.
 
Last edited:
With only 9 players on roster, this team cannot absorb any long term injuries to its starters, especially Liv.
UConn only plays 4 games in December. @Seton Hall (5th), Notre Dame (8th), @DePaul (16th) and Oklahoma (22nd - Mohegan Sun Arena).

This leaves plenty of time for healing up all woulds and nicks, working on individual and team deficiencies at practice, and going home for the holidays before beginning the second half of the season, and conference play.
And time for taking exams,too.
 
.-.
Seems like a rationalization to me
Evina has the ability to be an all-star
Her potential scoring would have made us a very much more dangerous team
If it means the end of the bench saw less action: so be it.

Sorry you're ill, Tony, take care...seems like cold and flu season is starting early
I'm recently out of the hospital with the open heart deal. No time for me to get sick
 
Evina can be the starting point guard the next 2 years. She will know the plays; and her knee will have time to fully heal. I hope the year of watching will be beneficial to her.

I have a feeling that Westbrook will play next year and then leave with Walker and her original graduating class. Bueckers is also going to compete for major minutes at PG.
 
I have a feeling that Westbrook will play next year and then leave with Walker and her original graduating class. Bueckers is also going to compete for major minutes at PG.
I agree, but only if she has an outstanding season.
 
I have a feeling that Westbrook will play next year and then leave with Walker and her original graduating class. Bueckers is also going to compete for major minutes at PG.
I she gets a ring and/or AA status. She would probably go. Without either one of those, there is more of a possibility of two years playing.
 
I have a feeling that Westbrook will play next year and then leave with Walker and her original graduating class. Bueckers is also going to compete for major minutes at PG.
Evina can be the starting point guard the next 2 years. She will know the plays; and her knee will have time to fully heal. I hope the year of watching will be beneficial to her.
Evina can be the starting point guard the next 2 years. She will know the plays; and her knee will have time to fully heal. I hope the year of watching will be beneficial to her.
Evina can be the starting point guard the next 2 years. She will know the plays; and her knee will have time to fully heal. I hope the year of watching will be beneficial to her.
I believe Paige will be our starting point guard next year. Evina will almost certainly start, but I doubt it will be as point guard. Jmo!
 
.-.
I have a feeling that Westbrook will play next year and then leave with Walker and her original graduating class. Bueckers is also going to compete for major minutes at PG.

I, too, suspect that Evina will be here for one year and then head for the WNBA. Others have done the same (think: Z). BUT Westbrook's success next year will determine her professional prospects, so she'd better do well. Which brings me to her likely position: not PG, but wing. She can put up numbers shooting and leave ball-handling to Paige and Christyn. Meg won't have to shoot from distance so much next year because there's abundant range on the perimeter. Walker is strong, can make short jumpers, drive to the hoop, and rebound with Liv. I agree with Tony: we're going be to a helluva team next year.
 
She’s very good. Tennessee was strange choice for her, but she liked something there. We’d be a much more flexible team this year with her. Two years would be nice.


A much better team. And Westbrook would be assured of playing both years and having experience in the system going into 2020. Don't think there's any way to argue her not playing is the better outcome.
 
A much better team. And Westbrook would be assured of playing both years and having experience in the system going into 2020. Don't think there's any way to argue her not playing is the better outcome.
Yup. She's probably gone after next year, unless she is still hampered by her injury & doesnt put up the numbers for her to get drafted.
 
Just thinkin over the holiday weekend as I sit here with a bad cold. If Westbrook was eligible where we would be? Well she averaged 14 pts a game last season so that would take care of our 5th starter averaging double digets but lets look at the other side. Everybody else might see limited time and would not be developing like they are now. We are undefeated and we wouldve still been undefeated. Having Mak Griff Molly Kyla and the rest being developed I think is the better senario. Westbrook most likely wouldve made a difference in the big games like DePaul SC Baylor Oregon. However if everybody else continues to get better I think we are better off in March and next season.

So looking ahead to next season. Dangerfield Irwin Adebayo and Bent graduate and Westbrook can play and everybody has experience and knows the system. So next season we have an experienced bench. We only have to replace Dangerfield in the starting lineup. We also have a big class coming in that will need to gain experience. Geno will be able to play them without concern as we will be 7-8 deep with experience. Thats huge. Just like this season our incoming class next season will need time to learn they system and be developed. We should be good enough next season as not to have to worry about that. Next years freshman class will be able to play without the pressure this years class is experienceing. IMO we will be the team to beat next season and beyond.
While I like what is happening and I believe Griffin and Ania are better off because of it AND there is no telling how Westbrook may have fared if she were given the opportunity to play. Some transfers, even highly talented (you name em, I won't) players have not lived up to expectations and were NOT the assets to Uconn they could have been. There is a significant difference to 3rd year top talent that started with Geno and those transferring in. However, I would have liked to have had the opportunity to see what a Westbrook Husky plays like. Danger probably would have had fewer bumps and bruises with Evina. Sitting on the bench, as we saw, as a transfer does not assure they have learned the Geno system.
 
.-.
Yup. She's probably gone after next year, unless she is still hampered by her injury & doesnt put up the numbers for her to get drafted.
Isn't this speculation????
 
A much better team. And Westbrook would be assured of playing both years and having experience in the system going into 2020. Don't think there's any way to argue her not playing is the better outcome.
I guess there is: I just did that. With a transfer (top player or 2) that transferred in and sat for a year neither performed as would be expected. Without seeing her play under Geno with in his system we can only speculate what she may have been but -----who knows??? Potential and previous performance have not proven (with transfers) to be a guarantee of future performances. The beautiful thing is: Whether she is great or not so great next year she'll play but not necessarily starting. (Again, 2 transfers seem to say that)
 
What if Tuck/Stevens had not left? What if Abrosimova hadn't been hurt? etc.
Time to move on????

Tony, I like your thoughts on the future a lot more than what's past.
 
I guess there is: I just did that. With a transfer (top player or 2) that transferred in and sat for a year neither performed as would be expected. Without seeing her play under Geno with in his system we can only speculate what she may have been but -----who knows??? Potential and previous performance have not proven (with transfers) to be a guarantee of future performances. The beautiful thing is: Whether she is great or not so great next year she'll play but not necessarily starting. (Again, 2 transfers seem to say that)


Not sure what you're getting at here. Not with Westbrook or the transfer comment.
 
A much better team. And Westbrook would be assured of playing both years and having experience in the system going into 2020. Don't think there's any way to argue her not playing is the better outcome.
You are being kind. Stating that playing without her is the “better scenario” is one of the more ludicrous statements made on this site. Illness can indeed play tricks on the mind.
 
.-.
Seems like a rationalization to me
Evina has the ability to be an all-star
Her potential scoring would have made us a very much more dangerous team
If it means the end of the bench saw less action: so be it.

Sorry you're ill, Tony, take care...seems like cold and flu season is starting early
I'm recently out of the hospital with the open heart deal. No time for me to get sick

msf22b- - I know what you're going through as I had my heart surgery 3 years ago!
Best wishes for a complete recovery!
 
Evina can be the starting point guard the next 2 years. She will know the plays; and her knee will have time to fully heal. I hope the year of watching will be beneficial to her.
I don't mean to burst anyone's bubble, but I think it highly likely Evina will play one year for UCONN and then go into the pro draft.
 
Hummm. Just a crazy fanatic fan here. Gotta say right out of the box I'm not impressed with transfers, period. My take is they just haven't absorbed the system and are unable to see, anticipate, respond, without the mental delay, because they have to "think", too late you just missed the play. While the're missing plays there are player that just need playing time to build confidence.

I cheer for the kids that are there and have committed to the team and program. I don't and choose to never think a freshmen is coming in and be given a starting role. I think they have to "take" it in practice. As well as convence coach the "team" is better with them on the floor.

I can not understand, what I seem to be missing. Every year we see awesome sophmore jumps and somehow Aubrey & Anna after completing their freshmen year, spending the off seasing practicing what they've learned are going to be bumped by freshmen who have never played a college game. Let alone that they don't know squat how to play in Geno's system.

God! I have and contine looking forward to every game to see the kids grow into the Uconn system of how to play the game.
 
I believe Paige will be our starting point guard next year. Evina will almost certainly start, but I doubt it will be as point guard. Jmo!
Tough for a freshman to play point even for someone with the obvious talent of Paige. Evina will be the next PG but PB will see a lot of minutes.
 
I don't think Evina would have eaten as many minutes as suggested. There would be more balanced rotation and between CW, CD and Anna although I suppose Anna with her cold shooting start may have had a harder time righting the ship and her minutes would be a bit less. I think Kyla and Aubrey would have been about the same. Only Molly would be greatly affected
I believe Evina would of been a starter and made us a much better team .
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,525
Messages
4,580,524
Members
10,490
Latest member
7774Forever


Top Bottom