I'm with TomCat/glass half empty. My views are all over the other threads last night and this morn so I won't repeat myself but I have a time hard time seeing this win through rose colored glasses as do many of the posters on this thread. The team got beat up last night, looks mentally exhausted, as is vulnerable. I'm not particularly worried about GT (although, I think we're rife for the taking at this moment) but the bigger fish coming up are all seemingly in a better place. The first step to Nirvana is recognizing the issues. Just assuming that everything will go swimmingly as in the past seems naive.
Well, I don't think I have rose colored classes. Maybe a little Huskie Blue, but mostly I like to use facts to back up my opinion.
They had a tough outing offensively at the Yum. Turned the ball over too many times. Missed too many 3's. And even the "all empty" fans would agree that Louisville was given a lot of latitude in their defensive efforts by the refs. I didn't get to watch the game until last night. I replayed many situations and confirmed the bad calls or non-calls. At least that is how I saw it.
Yet in front of 16+ screaming fans, under extreme pressure, they held on to a 10 point win.
I look at that as a good thing. And I don't think I'm being naive at all.
Now, going foward, some posters would have you believe that how they played against Louisville will be reflected going forward in their play. And that all of a sudden, Louisville exposed UConn and every team will now play them defensively the same way.
This is just some bad analysis, in my opinion and one we have heard before. Last year, after the Stanford loss, we heard how teams would now play Maya the same way. Leave Faris/Dixon open and play 4-5. Etc...etc... Well, they did lose after that. 24 games later. They beat a similar ND team, one that went to the final game 2 times and Duke by 30+ two time.
Now, I'm supposed to be concerned about how the team played for part of a game on the road against a tough and well coached team? They had a double digit lead for 90% of the game. I'll save my concern for things that have impact.
The best two things about that game was that Caroline showed she can be a factor this season. Offensively and defensively, it was her best game. And no one got hurt.
" The team got beat up last night, looks mentally exhausted, as is vulnerable. I'm not particularly worried about GT (although, I think we're rife for the taking at this moment) but the bigger fish coming up are all seemingly in a better place. "
I sure don't see the mentally exhausted part. I think the shooting slump for Lewis is wearing on her some. Nothing a hot game won't help. And you can bet she will have one soon. (cheap shot coming up) She is no Simmons. (you were warned!).
Rife for the taking? That's not half empty, that is all empty. And you smashed the glass too.
And lastly, who are these bigger fish coming up all seemingly in a better place? The remaining schedule is Gtown, Oklahoma, Pitt, Marquette and then ND. I guess you just mean ND. The BE Tourney? ND again.
Yeah ND is good. They beat them in OT the first time. UConn had every opportunity to win that game. Now they will probably play 2 times in the next month. Those might be good games to analyize to see where UConn is and how it might impact the NCAA tourney.
UConn is not perfect. They have issues that Geno is constantly addressing every day in practice. But ND has it's own issues. So does Baylor. And I haven't seen another team that UConn can't handle in a neutral court.
So, half full? Sure. Naive? I hope not.
Confident? Yep...having the best defense in the country that never rests will do that to me every time.