Welp, ACC stays together with a new agreement (LINK) | Page 7 | The Boneyard

Welp, ACC stays together with a new agreement (LINK)

I don’t think silence means anything. Not one B1G addition spoke prior to being added. The only school that bragged ahead of time was Missouri and they didn’t get the invite.

Flugar had an inside tip on USC, but no one believed him at the time. It was still pure shock when USC and UCLA were added.

Penn State, Nebraska, Maryland and Rutgers were all surprises.

Washington and Oregon were shocking in that they joined the same time as USC and UCLA. The PAC collapsed faster than most thought possible.

Texas and Oklahoma were quiet until just days before joining the SEC.
 
I don’t think silence means anything. Not one B1G addition spoke prior to being added. The only school that bragged ahead of time was Missouri and they didn’t get the invite.

Flugar had an inside tip on USC, but no one believed him at the time. It was still pure shock when USC and UCLA were added.

Penn State, Nebraska, Maryland and Rutgers were all surprises.

Washington and Oregon were shocking in that they joined the same time as USC and UCLA. The PAC collapsed faster than most thought possible.

Texas and Oklahoma were quiet until just days before joining the SEC.
And Rutgers had been quietly "groomed" for years on what they needed to do to be a viable candidate. No promises, more a listing of their shortcomings.
 
For the record, I was speaking of UNC & UVA. I still believe that FSU and Clemson have higher opinions of their ability to get a P2 bid than those who will ultimately offer bids have of them.

They would be redundancies in the SEC (who I imagine will be working to alleviate the redundancies they currently have) and I have a difficult time believing the B1G would be willing to enter new territory with the B brands in their home states.


 
Just a guess:

UNC and UVA to the SEC - SEC has Florida already, these open new markets
Clemson to B1G saving a space for ND
Duke, FSU, Pitt and Louisville to B12- Yormark gets his basketball brand plus rivalries with Pitt/WV

This leaves Cuse, Miami, GT, NC State, SMU, Cal, Stanford, VT, BC, Wake.
 
Last edited:
Just a guess:

UNC and UVA to the SEC - SEC has Florida already, these open new markets
Clemson to B1G saving a space for ND
Duke, FSU, Pitt and Louisville to B12- Yormark gets his basketball brand plus rivalries with Pitt/WV

This leaves Cuse, Miami, GT, NC State, SMU, Cal, Stamford, VT, BC, Wake.
I cant see Clemson to the Big 10. Many cultural and academic differences. Same for UVA and UNC to SEC but proximity is good for travel in non-revenue sports. Has Scar forgiven them? (Yeah the old ACC Gamecocks like me are dying off).

NCState has $ value.
 
Last edited:
I cant see Clemson to the Big 10. Many cultural and academic differences. Same for UVA and UNC to SEC but proximity is good for travel in non-revenue sports. Has Scar forgiven them? (Yeah the old ACC Gamecocks like me are dying off).

NCState has $ value.
NC State has value, but does it have enough to justify an SEC invite? I'm not sure of that because the bar is so high.
 
I cant see Clemson to the Big 10. Many cultural and academic differences. Same for UVA and UNC to SEC but proximity is good for travel in non-revenue sports. Has Scar forgiven them? (Yeah the old ACC Gamecocks like me are dying off).

NCState has $ value.
A lot of moving parts. Would FSU go to the B12? I don't think the B1G grabs them. State has value, but I don't believe they are an SEC team, definitely not a B1G. Possibly a B12. UVA could be left behind or could join all 3. Clemson to the SEC? It’s possible but the Cocks are already in that market. So many moving parts.
 
NC State has value, but does it have enough to justify an SEC invite? I'm not sure of that because the bar is so high.
NC State has value, but does it have enough to justify an SEC invite? I'm not sure of that because the bar is so high.
If UNC chooses to go to the Big10, the SEC would grab a large share of the NC market FOOTBALL FANS and their eyeballs. Same for a UVA/VaTech split. The SEC likes adding new states with geographic contiguity. It also like schools that have high home attendance in football.

UNC is a monster brand and much matters on their decision. They do like their ACC empire and vassal states and probably wouldn’t consider leaving except for money projections.
 
If UNC chooses to go to the Big10, the SEC would grab a large share of the NC market FOOTBALL FANS and their eyeballs. Same for a UVA/VaTech split. The SEC likes adding new states with geographic contiguity. It also like schools that have high home attendance in football.

UNC is a monster brand and much matters on their decision. They do like their ACC empire and vassal states and probably wouldn’t consider leaving except for money projections.
From what we're hearing UNC appears headed to the SEC. If that's correct, I'm not sure that NC State brings enough value to justify an invite. That isn't say they're not a valuable property, they just may not be a valuable enough property particularly after UNC is already on board. Now, if the state legislature or requires both schools to go together as a package deal, that becomes a different issue.
 
From a cultural perspective, the fan bases of Va Tech and NC State are far more similar to those of SEC schools than the fan bases of UVA and UNC.

Back in the Beemer days when the Hokies were regularly a ranked program and often spent time in the top ten, they likely had a legitimate shot at an SEC invitation. These days that appears to be a bridge too far. NC State would need a massive step forward to land on the SEC's radar.
 
From what we're hearing UNC appears headed to the SEC. If that's correct, I'm not sure that NC State brings enough value to justify an invite. That isn't say they're not a valuable property, they just may not be a valuable enough property particularly after UNC is already on board. Now, if the state legislature or requires both schools to go together as a package deal, that becomes a different issue.
You are correct. If UNC joins the SEC, NC State would have no value to the SEC. Indeed, I think the SEC would decline to accept UNC if the state of NC tried to dictate conference choices
 
I still think they are missing a key component in CR. The value of UNC and NC State together is more valuable than the sum of their parts individually. Same with Oklahoma-Okie State, Florida-Florida State, etc. If separated, NC State could dominate the ACC while UNC flounders in a conference like the SEC. I know, can't double up states anymore, but I think they are missing how important rivalries are.
 
I still think they are missing a key component in CR. The value of UNC and NC State together is more valuable than the sum of their parts individually. Same with Oklahoma-Okie State, Florida-Florida State, etc. If separated, NC State could dominate the ACC while UNC flounders in a conference like the SEC. I know, can't double up states anymore, but I think they are missing how important rivalries are.

If that was actually true, the SEC would not have turned down Florida State 230 times.
 
I still think they are missing a key component in CR. The value of UNC and NC State together is more valuable than the sum of their parts individually. Same with Oklahoma-Okie State, Florida-Florida State, etc. If separated, NC State could dominate the ACC while UNC flounders in a conference like the SEC. I know, can't double up states anymore, but I think they are missing how important rivalries are.
The rivalries don’t get broken. Clemson still plays SCar. FSU still plays Florida. GTech still plays UGA.
 
If that was actually true, the SEC would not have turned down Florida State 230 times.
I know it's not the way CR is playing out but CR has been ridiculous about it. It doesn't mean it is not true. Even UConn and Syracuse although not in the same state would be a great rivalry in the ACC if they had been added together. When they play now, no real juice, so to speak.

The rivalries don’t get broken. Clemson still plays SCar. FSU still plays Florida. GTech still plays UGA.
For now. Probably not as the conferences continue to grow or the P2 split off altogether. And rivalries only really mean something within a conference. I am not in the know but I doubt Georgia fans actually consider Ga Tech a great rival anymore.
 
I know it's not the way CR is playing out but CR has been ridiculous about it. It doesn't mean it is not true. Even UConn and Syracuse although not in the same state would be a great rivalry in the ACC if they had been added together. When they play now, no real juice, so to speak.


For now. Probably not as the conferences continue to grow or the P2 split off altogether. And rivalries only really mean something within a conference. I am not in the know but I doubt Georgia fans actually consider Ga Tech a great rival anymore.
I can assure you that SCar v Clemson and FSU v Florida are still rivalries in every sport. GaTech still considers UGA a rivalry he even though the football rivalry is languishing
 
I can assure you that SCar v Clemson and FSU v Florida are still rivalries in every sport. GaTech still considers UGA a rivalry he even though the football rivalry is languishing
Even if true, I am saying they would be more valuable playing in the same conference. I'd wager that SEC fans in general are much more interested in Alabama-Auburn than USC-Clemson.
 
Even if true, I am saying they would be more valuable playing in the same conference. I'd wager that SEC fans in general are much more interested in Alabama-Auburn than USC-Clemson.
Not right now or last year. Auburn is too down. SEC fans do care about the historic interconference rivalries of the old Eastern Division. And they may matter more now with the playoffs.


Notre Dame and UConn didn’t matter in wbb when ND went to the ACC?
 
Not right now or last year. Auburn is too down. SEC fans do care about the historic interconference rivalries of the old Eastern Division. And they may matter more now with the playoffs.


Notre Dame and UConn didn’t matter in wbb when ND went to the ACC?
Recency bias doesn't matter with big rivalries. Alabama-Auburn is still a much more important rivalry to the SEC making both programs more valuable. Would USC receive more hype if Clemson were in the SEC? I think so. We fans outside of SEC country know about Alabama-Auburn but don't care much about USC-Clemson, no disrespect.
 
Speaking of UVA in the key tweest thread, I like the stadium's North End Zone Hill. It looks like a grassy hill standing room only. Imagine if UConn had incorporated "The Hill" into a new on campus stadium. Very cool. For the young uns, The Hill was the grassy hill outside the south end of Memorial Stadium where most students would go to watch games, what with kegs being allowed and all.


UVA also has a brand new football operations center to add to the campus athletic facilities

 
The Hill was the grassy hill outside the south end of Memorial Stadium where most students would go to watch games, what with kegs being allowed and all.
Of course, kegs were also allowed in the stands, provided that you covered them with your jacket as you brought them in.
 
Kegs were also allowed in the soccer stadium. Legit allowed. UConn was so far ahead of its time.
In hindsight, I laugh how we thought that we were being stealth by partially covering a keg with a coat as we walked in. There's no way that everyone didn't know what was going on.
 

Online statistics

Members online
223
Guests online
2,309
Total visitors
2,532

Forum statistics

Threads
163,953
Messages
4,376,563
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom