- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,600
- Reaction Score
- 9,739
Not sure how that happens if Houston gets a 1. They won't put 2 B12 teams as top seeds in the same regionNo matter the seed Kansas will be placed in Omaha in the Dallas Regional.
Not sure how that happens if Houston gets a 1. They won't put 2 B12 teams as top seeds in the same regionNo matter the seed Kansas will be placed in Omaha in the Dallas Regional.
Kansas looks awful.
Woah, all of Kansas' losses are from away or neutral courts.They aren’ a top 10 team. If they aren’t playing at home, their true identity comes out
Not last night, 5 pts 2/12 shootingDickinson will get his points no matter what
Yep, I said this even in pre-season. This isn't their year. I think Self made a mistake trading depth for Hunter. They'd be really screwed if Furphy hadn't exceeded expectations.McCullar is the one guy that can reliably go make his own offense on that team and opens up so much for the rest of that squad. And yes, they have zero depth, which has been painfully obvious tonight.
Yes although if you look at the teams after UConn Purdue and prob Houston, there really aren’t any teams you’re going to feel good about saying “this is a top ten team”.They aren’ a top 10 team. If they aren’t playing at home, their true identity comes out
That last piece is a huge point. This current UConn team with a healthy Cam and DC along with Castle able to shadow McCullar on defense would win 7-8 times out of 10 if we were to play them again IMO.Woah, all of Kansas' losses are from away or neutral courts.
Again, Kansas has no depth. Dickinson will get his points no matter what, but if they are matched up against a team with a strong defensive wing that can shut down McCullar, they are toast.
I'm thinking 10/10 if on neutral courts.That last piece is a huge point. This current UConn team with a healthy Cam and DC along with Castle able to shadow McCullar on defense would win 7-8 times out of 10 if we were to play them again IMO.
Well, they are in a much better conference.Kansas now 7-5 in conf, #6 in country. Where would we be after 5 conference losses at this point? We’d be out of the top 25.
Hotballs not pulling any punches on twitter/x. UK fans are gonna angry mob him.
Didn’t know where to put this so just started the weekly thread.
Well if we look back all the way to last season, on January 22nd we were 5-5 in conference and ranked #19 the next day. So not reallyKansas now 7-5 in conf, #6 in country. Where would we be after 5 conference losses at this point? We’d be out of the top 25.
You are saying that we have been treated as well as Kansas and Duke for that matter in the polls based on our team quality throughout our history? Cmon, please.Well, they are in a much better conference.
The need to reach for conspiracy theories against us is childish and tiresome.
Says the guy whose team is in ELEVENTH place in its conferencekansas' roster is much like the big east. has about 3-4 quality parts and the rest are at a low major level.
I’m saying quit whining about itYou are saying that we have been treated as well as Kansas and Duke for that matter in the polls based on our team quality throughout our history? Cmon, please.
I think you are actually a husky fan. You chirp the loudest when Cinn is circling the toilet and praying to become ACC Syracuse some day and UConn is doing things the bearcats won’t sniff before Armageddon (and yes I acknowledge that could be a short time horizon).kansas' roster is much like the big east. has about 3-4 quality parts and the rest are at a low major level.
By this logic, the best team in Cincinnati is low major level. Where does that leave UC?kansas' roster is much like the big east. has about 3-4 quality parts and the rest are at a low major level.
His FT % is what like 96% ? That's got to be up there all time.Is it possible DJ Davis is the greatest shooter of all time?