Week 4 NCAA Football | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Week 4 NCAA Football

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,036
Reaction Score
53,558
Penn St has 1st and goal with 1:25 left up 49-0.

Do they take a knee? Of course not.

Stay classy James Franklin.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
288
Reaction Score
1,065
Central is a middle of the pack NEC team...not a CAA team. You keep saying things like this but you clearly don't understand any thing about the university.

Yep, you are 100% right.

CCSU simply needs to increase its total athletics budget from about $17M to $22M and aspire to be a mid-level America East/CAA Football program instead of a lowly NEC member.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
903
Reaction Score
3,365
That's why when I looked at the live score of the JMU-North Carolina game I got an uneasy feeling like missing out on a stock I could have purchased at a low price. Although I don't get into too many debates on the BoneYard, I did push back on people that stated UConn's lack of money is why football is so bad, which I think is BS. They should never have been historically bad like they have been for some of the years between 2012-2023 (i.e. 2017, 2018, etc.) Sure, UConn does not have a conference that the G5 schools do, but they have more money and brand recognition. There are schools doing far more with much less money and definitely less brand recognition.
JMU has some decent fb history, is a football school, and has been a top FCS school for some time.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,521
Reaction Score
34,181
I understand the payroll difference, but the talent between the 2 rosters is similar. And, they had the #3 recruiting class in 2014 and the #5 recruiting class in 2024. The money is only keeping them in their position in college football.

A few differences that fall under two big headings:

1) Recruiting classes will be much less relevant going forward with the transfer portal. Coaches have blown it on recruiting classes over the years (Mack Brown could hold clinics on it during his time at Texas), but the transfer portal is much lower risk. A staff can bring in an experienced player that can play now, rather than have to project a 17 year old kid out 3 or 4 years. Where would you rather spend your money?
2) In 2014, the experience for a star player was not that much different at tOSU than it was at Georgia Tech or even Boise State. Players would pick their school on several factors, including how good a team was projected to be, playing time available, and the coach. Going forward, money is #1, #2 and #3. Everything else is secondary or tertiary. The schools that have the money to spend will dominate with the top talent, and with the bench players. Top schools will be able to pay preferred walkons more than they would make starting at other schools.


Unless there is revenue sharing or a salary cap, the difference between the top schools and even the schools just outside the top is going to be massive.

This problem will be much worse for football because the rosters are so big and so many players contribute every game.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
1,373
Reaction Score
4,339
Back in Nebraskas heyday with Tom Osborne, there were no roster limits and scholarship limits were higher, if not non existent. They had a system whereby they stockpiled kids first at their regional campuses and then on the rosters, I think 150 rings a bell. They were able to keep the talent away from you and I, and somehow, the $$ worked out for the kids to make that decision. You(Nelson) are describing a similar effect, but with alot more money. Back then, there was more money than we knew, but hidden.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
248
Guests online
1,983
Total visitors
2,231

Forum statistics

Threads
158,715
Messages
4,165,558
Members
10,039
Latest member
jfreeds


.
Top Bottom