Was that really a 31-1 team? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Was that really a 31-1 team?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well they did beat Florida and NC State but yeah i do get the sense they haven't been really tested (other than their one loss at Notre Dame). Wouldn't be surprised to see them bounced in the Sweet 16. Maybe even sooner depending on who they're up against.
 
Well they did beat Florida and NC State but yeah i do get the sense they haven't been really tested (other than their one loss at Notre Dame). Wouldn't be surprised to see them bounced in the Sweet 16. Maybe even sooner depending on who they're up against.

What does this even mean? Syracuse has had plently of close games, and Notre Dame isn't close to being an elite team.

So how have they not been test? Because they haven't lost more games>?
 
I guess. Hindsight is 20/20 though. Did you ever really think to yourself "this guy's gonna be a force if he gets in shape" last year? I know I didn't. I think Xmas has shown more flashes of skill than Melo did last year (of course that doesn't mean he's going to be better).

Did I think he could average 8 and 6 in 25 minutes? Yes.

Do I think he is a force? That is a good question. The simple answer is no.

The longer answer is that he is great defensively but a poor rebounder and not good offensively. Someone like Emeka or Thabeet were forces. Emeka as a soph/junior and Thabeet as a junior. Fab is not at that level. Okafor averaged 16 and 11 with 4.7 blocks per game as a sophomore, then 18, 11.5 and 4.1 as a junior. Thabeet averaged 14, 11 and 4 as a junior. Even with the minute difference, Fab doesn't come close. Even defensively Fab has issues with foul trouble.
 
What does this even mean? Syracuse has had plently of close games, and Notre Dame isn't close to being an elite team.

So how have they not been test? Because they haven't lost more games>?

Probably that SU has only 1 game against a current top 10 team this year (AP).

UK played KU, UNC (2)
KU played UK, Duke, OSU, Missouri twice (5)
UNC played UK, Duke twice, MSU (4)
Missouri played KU twice (2)
Duke played UNC twice, OSU, KU, MSU, Michigan (6)
OSU played MSU twice, Michigan twice, Duke, KU (6)
MSU played OSU twice, Michigan twice, UNC, Duke (6)
Michigan played OSU twice, MSU twice, Duke (5)

That is 18 losses for the other 8 teams in the top 10 or about half (40) of the losses for those 8 teams.

Marquette and Syracuse played each other once in the Carrier Dome.

If you want to look at top 15, Syracuse has 1 more game against G-town again at the Carrier Dome. But if you add that then you have include Baylor/Wisconsin/Indiana games for a few of the above teams and SU is still short compared the rest of the top 10 as Marquette picks up two games against G-town.

Top 20 doesn't help SU, but adds some to other teams (Duke and UNC mainly).
Top 25 adds in the @ND game and Florida (Dome).

The toughest road games SU had that it won were @ Cincy/UL/UConn by a combined 10 points. That Cuse won all 3 is impressive, but they did lose their only road game to a team currently ranked in AP top 25.
 
What does this even mean? Syracuse has had plently of close games, and Notre Dame isn't close to being an elite team.

So how have they not been test? Because they haven't lost more games>?

I guess I'm just not that that convinced by the quality and depth of the Big East this year. It seems very top heavy. There are too many teams like Rutgers and St. John's and Nova and Providence for the conference powers to beat up on. The Big East has five teams with sub-500 records, versus two in the Big Ten. Granted the Big East is a lot bigger, but I think that is exactly the problem. But who knows, I might be completely wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.
 
Probably that SU has only 1 game against a current top 10 team this year (AP).

UK played KU, UNC (2)
KU played UK, Duke, OSU, Missouri twice (5)
UNC played UK, Duke twice, MSU (4)
Missouri played KU twice (2)
Duke played UNC twice, OSU, KU, MSU, Michigan (6)
OSU played MSU twice, Michigan twice, Duke, KU (6)
MSU played OSU twice, Michigan twice, UNC, Duke (6)
Michigan played OSU twice, MSU twice, Duke (5)

That is 18 losses for the other 8 teams in the top 10 or about half (40) of the losses for those 8 teams.

Marquette and Syracuse played each other once in the Carrier Dome.

If you want to look at top 15, Syracuse has 1 more game against G-town again at the Carrier Dome. But if you add that then you have include Baylor/Wisconsin/Indiana games for a few of the above teams and SU is still short compared the rest of the top 10 as Marquette picks up two games against G-town.

Top 20 doesn't help SU, but adds some to other teams (Duke and UNC mainly).
Top 25 adds in the @ND game and Florida (Dome).

The toughest road games SU had that it won were @ Cincy/UL/UConn by a combined 10 points. That Cuse won all 3 is impressive, but they did lose their only road game to a team currently ranked in AP top 25.

Except Notre Dame isn't a top 10 team...so why include them in the discussion?
 
.-.
Did I think he could average 8 and 6 in 25 minutes? Yes.

Do I think he is a force? That is a good question. The simple answer is no.

The longer answer is that he is great defensively but a poor rebounder and not good offensively. Someone like Emeka or Thabeet were forces. Emeka as a soph/junior and Thabeet as a junior. Fab is not at that level. Okafor averaged 16 and 11 with 4.7 blocks per game as a sophomore, then 18, 11.5 and 4.1 as a junior. Thabeet averaged 14, 11 and 4 as a junior. Even with the minute difference, Fab doesn't come close. Even defensively Fab has issues with foul trouble.

I guess you have a harsher definition of 'force' than me, which is fine. Of course he's not Okafor - who was at worst 1 of the 2 best players on the best team in the country. But he does a lot on defense, alters a ton of shots which doesn't show up on the stat sheet. Offensively he's obviously not a game changer but not a total liability here (ie he can finish a play).
Even if he is as 'blah' as you make him out to be I'm not sure why you then don't think that other guys can fill his shoes; seems a bit contradictory no?

Probably that SU has only 1 game against a current top 10 team this year (AP)...

The toughest road games SU had that it won were @ Cincy/UL/UConn by a combined 10 points. That Cuse won all 3 is impressive, but they did lose their only road game to a team currently ranked in AP top 25.

If we had lost to UL or Uconn and beaten ND, guess which team(s) would be ranked? Probably not ND. So you see it's a bit of a circular argument.

Can't argue that we haven't played the other top 7-8 teams where as the others have. Exactly how significant that is I'm not sure. The home team basically wins all those games with a couple exceptions. I mean what does the refs giving the home team both games in the Mizzou-Kansas series really tell you about either team? IMO not much. If you'd feel better about SU in the tournament if they had beaten UNC in the Dome by 1pt or lost a hard fought game @Kansas, well to each his own; I think that's kind of silly.
 
I guess. Hindsight is 20/20 though. Did you ever really think to yourself "this guy's gonna be a force if he gets in shape" last year? I know I didn't. I think Xmas has shown more flashes of skill than Melo did last year (of course that doesn't mean he's going to be better).

We must have different definitions of the word "force".
 
Hey 31-1.....don't care how, just WIN....they know how, they have confidence , theyhave depth and they have experience. Pretty much as dangerous as anyone I'd say! You can look at the BE and say they're down but look at all the conferences the other #1's come out of....same story.
 
Except Notre Dame isn't a top 10 team...so why include them in the discussion?

It was the only current top 25 team Cuse played on the road? I'm just guessing at what he was talking about.
 
I guess you have a harsher definition of 'force' than me, which is fine. Of course he's not Okafor - who was at worst 1 of the 2 best players on the best team in the country. But he does a lot on defense, alters a ton of shots which doesn't show up on the stat sheet. Offensively he's obviously not a game changer but not a total liability here (ie he can finish a play).
Even if he is as 'blah' as you make him out to be I'm not sure why you then don't think that other guys can fill his shoes; seems a bit contradictory no?



If we had lost to UL or Uconn and beaten ND, guess which team(s) would be ranked? Probably not ND. So you see it's a bit of a circular argument.

Can't argue that we haven't played the other top 7-8 teams where as the others have. Exactly how significant that is I'm not sure. The home team basically wins all those games with a couple exceptions. I mean what does the refs giving the home team both games in the Mizzou-Kansas series really tell you about either team? IMO not much. If you'd feel better about SU in the tournament if they had beaten UNC in the Dome by 1pt or lost a hard fought game @Kansas, well to each his own; I think that's kind of silly.

For your first point. I'm not saying Fab is a blah player. His defense is very, very good. He just is a fairly poor rebounder and not good enough offensively for me to call him a force on the court. You are switching from Xmas filling his shoes to "other guys". I think between Keita/Xmas they might surpass Fabs production, I don't think either will individually without a huge jump (not a jump "half as much as Melo did").

For your second. I don't think UConn would have been ranked unless they won at least 2 of the 3 games against SU.

UL perhaps, they were in almost as bad a freefall as UConn for awhile. Again I was just guessing at what the other guy said. IMO Cuse is a darn good team, but they just haven't been as tested as some other teams out there. They play 2-3 games against top ten teams and they probably have at least 1 more loss if not more.
 
Well don't look now but they're losing by six in the early going against Cincy...
 
.-.
I wouldn't give it to them. Weak out of conference sched, off year for the Big East, struggled to beat an unranked opponent in the BET quarters, now this?
who is going to pass cuse?

uk/unc/cuse/kan
i think even a loss for any of these 4 and still they are good
 
.-.
It's kinda deflating to see how easy the 3 point shot comes to some of these teams. If Cincinnati doesn't hit all those 3's in the first half they don't have such a big lead. If Syracuse doesn't hit all these 3's in the 2nd half they are unable to even be as close as they are now.
 
It's kinda deflating to see how easy the 3 point shot comes to some of these teams. If Cincinnati doesn't hit all those 3's in the first half they don't have such a big lead. If Syracuse doesn't hit all these 3's in the 2nd half they are unable to even be as close as they are now.
was thinking the same thing. Maybe they need to move the line back some more
 
Fine. But I don't think this is the fourth-best team in the country. Not even close. Just sayin'
 
.-.
Glad Syracuse lost.

Now the winner could be Cincy, UL or ND. Gag me with a spoon.
 
I think Louisville will win it now. Why couldn't we have done what Cincy did? I guess it was bad offensive execution at the end of the game and missing too many shots at the end of the game.
 
I like UL. ND not so much. Cincy is OK but hmmm...
 
Usually a team with that record is a real kick ass team. Scary.

Did any of you think they were a scary, dominant team? I don't think so.

....
I only caught a few minutes of the game, but I'm not surprised by the outcome. People tend to forget about the ebb and flow that teams go through throughout a season. It just seems that SU has hit a wall. They have been very good and deep throughout most of the season, but doesn't it seem that the games of Joseph, Fair and Jardine have fallen off dramatically?

Maybe SU will get re-energized once the NCAA begins and go on a roll, but right now they look extremely vulnerable.

On a side note, Sutherland went 1-7 and 1-5 from 3 in 23 minutes. If he did that yesterday we would have been the team that faced Cincy today.

I have a feeling that -4 and NC is again up for grabs for 3 seeds and lower. I don't feel any of the top 8 teams are all dominant teams. As much as I don't like UK and the Squid, they are scary good, but youth tends to rear its ugly head in the Tournament. Setting UK aside, I wouldn't be surprised if whatever other 3 teams end up #1 seeds don't make it to the last week of the tournament. Yeah, since none advanced that far last season, that doesn't sound like a reach. It just seems the so called dominant teams just aren't that dominant. UNC can score, but can they defend? Mizzu is fun to watch, but I wonder if a slow-it-down team like ND could give them fits. KU is an interesting team that seems to have gotten better as the season has gone on and might be peaking at the right time. (I spoke too soon. Just saw that Baylor took out KU in the Big-12 tourney.)

Should be another fun tournament. I can't wait till it starts.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,306
Messages
4,562,342
Members
10,457
Latest member
caw2


Top Bottom