Warde on Record: 10,000 More Seats (Hartford Business Journal)

[Dooley]

He's the guy that prompted " not a dime back".

From accounts I heard from UConn law( where this d bag went) everyone disliked him.

Thanks - I never knew his name (or forgot it). I remember the press conference and the stir that this bozo caused. He just seems to have it out for anything UCONN. Ironic that he's biting the hand that fed him if he went to UCONN law.

 

[huskymedic]

Thanks - I never knew his name (or forgot it). I remember the press conference and the stir that this bozo caused. He just seems to have it out for anything UCONN. Ironic that he's biting the hand that fed him if he went to UCONN law.

 

[RedSoloCup]

I think the term for him is gadfly.

Another term is 'waste of oxygen'.

 

[Pudge]

Agree in some respect... but I guess my point in posting it was that there are many more like him and spending the money to expand the Rent will not go unchallenged.

Sure.

Nothing is easy & there is always opposition. In fact, as we know, we have two distinct polar groups now in our country. We could say buy milk ... and they would say but it's not chocolate.

 

[Carl Spackler]

Everybody take one wild guess where Ken Krayeske went to undergrad school.


Here's the thing - and no way around it.

If you can build reasonably to 50,000 seats, and you can make that money up, and do it smart financially (and we can) - I would wager it will be in the ball park of expense that the new basketball facility is costing - yet those 10,000 seats are actually capable of drawing money......regularly...... BUT - say you can do that .....and then the time comes when you can sell those seats and you don't have them to sell? you facked up. We should have had a 50,000 seat arena by last season. The previous administration facked up. This one can't, it needs to get done, because we need the revenue streams those extra 10,000 seats can generate in the future.

It's basically gravy on top, that 50,000 permanent seats would make Rentschler a bigger 1A/FBS dedicated venue than Chestnut Hill or the Carrier Dome. That would be something that recruiters can put on their list to talk about - the biggest home stadium in New England and New York State.

We need these things in the new conference we're in.

 

[coachcap]

Everybody take one wild guess where Ken Krayeske went to undergrad school.


Here's the thing - and no way around it.

If you can build reasonably to 50,000 seats, and you can make that money up, and do it smart financially (and we can) - I would wager it will be in the ball park of expense that the new basketball facility is costing - yet those 10,000 seats are actually capable of drawing money.regularly. BUT - say you can do that .....and then the time comes when you can sell those seats and you don't have them to sell? you facked up. We should have had a 50,000 seat arena by last season. The previous administration facked up. This one can't, it needs to get done, because we need the revenue streams those extra 10,000 seats can generate in the future.

It's basically gravy on top, that 50,000 permanent seats would make Rentschler a bigger 1A/FBS dedicated venue than Chestnut Hill or the Carrier Dome. That would be something that recruiters can put on their list to talk about - the biggest home stadium in New England and New York State.

We need these things in the new conference we're in.

Carl isn't Yale Bowl larger capacity? It used to hold @ 70K. After the refurbishment, isn't still around 60K capacity?

 

[Carl Spackler]

Yeah coach - yale bowl with their new renovations is something like 65k. But it's still damn old and rickety - and the Ivy League is not division 1A and isn't scheduling division 1A opponents.

 

[Kolumbo]

Shouldn't they be focusing on building a stadium on campus? Let high schools use The Rent.

 

[Jimmy Serrano]

Yeah coach - yale bowl with their new renovations is something like 65k. But it's still damn old and rickety - and the Ivy League is not division 1A and isn't scheduling division 1A opponents.

Actually I believe Army is coming into the Bowl this year..........

 

[jostar1]

The website of the company that did the concrete says that it can be expanded by 20,000 seats. That would make 60,000 seats possible.

Approximately half of the 40,000-seat structure is comprised of structured seating utilizing a precast structural framing system totaling 97,600 SF. The lower bowl portion of the facility is below grade. The layout and design for the structure will allow expansion of another 20,000 seats in the future.

http://blakesleeprestress.com/proje...3E-8AE1656170DACE59&categoryIDs=&searchString=

 

[Da_Aisijimo_Gou]

With the Rent's footings and other infrastructure initially designed and built for future expansion to seat comfortably seat 50K, UCONN was ahead of the game. See this somewhat related article on Baylor's stadium now under construction. Hmmm, 45K seats in the Big 12. Shocking!

 

[Carl Spackler]

Actually I believe Army is coming into the Bowl this year.....

alright. I give.

Here's my point.

Recruiter X walks into Recruit Y's living room. Asks: Do you want to play in the biggest home FBS football stadium in all of New England and New York?

that question (and answer - assuming we've built the stadium out to it's originally designed capacity - is valid,true, accurate because even though Yale has the largest football stadium in the same region (and has since 1910 or something).......they are not an FBS football program.

 

[Carl Spackler]

Shouldn't they be focusing on building a stadium on campus? Let high schools use The Rent.

Short answer is that UCONN was very, very close to breaking ground on an on-campus football facility with essentially the same specs as Rentschler field about 15 years ago, but local politics worked it's way into state politics and got it all stopped. The stadium was built on the grounds it stands now, as a last resort that took a lot of work to push through the state legislature as a result of the local community rebelling around Storrs.

The time for an on-campus football stadium has long passed, we have what we have, and we are really a very unique athletic department in the country in so very many ways - and our football stadium location being just one.

 

[Da_Aisijimo_Gou]

I think the term for him is gadfly.

Another term is 'waste of oxygen'.

Or, Syracuse alumnus.

 

[uconNYC]

Shouldn't they be focusing on building a stadium on campus? Let high schools use The Rent.

We're too far down the road for that to happen anytime in the next 40 years (when this stadium becomes completely outdated).

As Carl mentioned - UConn is a bit of an anomaly in that we play many games in major sports off-campus. It's now part of the school tradition. Just accept it. It's a good trade-off for the massive support the State govtnment gives the university.

 

[Dooley]

The trade-off is simple: UCONN athletics agree to play their sports in off-campus venues so that it is easier for alumni and fans to get in and out of games. In return, the state writes billion dollar checks. Without UCONN, there is no need to renovate the XL Center whatsoever and, therefore, no incentive for dining/entertainment businesses to open in the capital city.

 

[rich1122]

Critical year for us. Even to think about an upgrade we need 28K - that's about a 5K increase from last year. My sense from talking to people is that we may see a bump from last year but not much. Many of the same folks signing up, but no new blood despite my encouragement. In order to move to another conference we need to catch fire and I am hesitant no matter what the record and enthusiasm of Diaco. As usual I hope that I am wrong, but the CT fan base has just not embraced College Football.

 

[junglehusky]

Critical year for us. Even to think about an upgrade we need 28K - that's about a 5K increase from last year. My sense from talking to people is that we may see a bump from last year but not much. Many of the same folks signing up, but no new blood despite my encouragement. In order to move to another conference we need to catch fire and I am hesitant no matter what the record and enthusiasm of Diaco. As usual I hope that I am wrong, but the CT fan base has just not embraced College Football.

Reasonable sounding energy vampire is still an energy vampire.

 

[FAIRTIDES]

Critical year for us. Even to think about an upgrade we need 28K - that's about a 5K increase from last year. My sense from talking to people is that we may see a bump from last year but not much. Many of the same folks signing up, but no new blood despite my encouragement. In order to move to another conference we need to catch fire and I am hesitant no matter what the record and enthusiasm of Diaco. As usual I hope that I am wrong, but the CT fan base has just not embraced College Football.

I disagree. a whole bunch. Any evaluation the UCONN FB as a future business partner will come to the conclusion that the opportunity is little changed from Consultant's Report that referred to UCONN as an "SEC environment waiting to happen." More importantly, it will show that UCONN's FB fan base is incredibly resilient, especially when the bait-and-switch nature of the Program's conference affiliation is considered.

When UCONN was considering the 1A business, it was exciting to think about yearly visits from a group that included VT, Miami, BC, Cuse, Pitt, Rutgers, WVU plus the occasional, attractive OOC opponent. Before snap-one, three of the most attractive opponents had been replaced with schools with which we had no true identity. A few years later, another school bolted, followed closely by three more. I realize that's old news, but very few have mentioned the upheaval in terms of the psychological impact on the overall fan base.

On top the CR issues came the PP years. Again, any outside evaluator would see the PP years as proof positive that UCONN, like every other college FB Program, is one unfortunate coaching hire from the doldrums. Check Texas, post-Royal; USC, Post-McKay and Robinson; Oklahoma, post-Wilkinson; Notre Dame, post-Ara P and Holtz; Florida, post-Spurrier; and Alabama, post-Bryant. There are more, but the message is clear. Every FB program, even the spiffy types mentioned above, is susceptible to a poor coaching hire.

The UCONN fan base has, for the most part, shown loyalty. Through all the crap it has been put through, the base continues to purchase 23,000 plus season tickets. And, when provided with something worth watching, the fan base pulls off a Michigan, or reduces a Palko to jelly, or generates compliments from an RGIII. Any evaluation that goes back and views video from games as far back as BC and Indiana through the RE years and even a few games from the PP doldrums will see proof of a fan base that both shows up and drives opponents to distraction. The variables? Competitive UCONN vs. a recognizable opponent.

That's not to say that UCONN shouldn't be doing everything possible to fill the RENT. Anything else would be bad business/incredibly stupid. But any evaluator that doesn't understand that the right environment will make every RENT game a Michigan-like event is not looking.

 

[Chief00]

I think Warde has done a good job hiring coaches - hand forced or otherwise. However I question some of his business judgments including the lower level suite idea at XL. The high end is just not there in the Hartford market - not enough of it. There are not enough big companies willing to buy up large blocks of suite seats. The Whaler hey day of Aetna spending tons of money on boxes and seats is no longer the culture. Other Hartford companies have been absorbed by mergers by larger companies headquartered somewhere else. The cost of retro fitting an obsolete building is also questionable and how many years is the payback? Keep in mind the Governor has said the current band-aide renovation is just a stop gap step with a new building in mind if the NHL comes calling.

 

[DarthGrumpy]

UConn is not at the same level; but, as a FYI, UConn to the Rent is 23 miles. UCLA's main campus is 28 miles away from the Rose Bowl.

 

[uconnbill]

Small time thinking and the Connecticut Yankee is why UCONN is at 40,000 seats. The stadium should have been 50,000 to begin with and from talking to a high ranking politician back in 2000 stated that the stadium should be 60,000, but in discussions a number felt UCONN should go more moderate with the building of the stadium. They did the same thing with Gampbel pavilion when it was built at 8,200 and now is over 10,000.

Small time thinking has lead to this and why others think of UCONN football as small time. You have to change the perspective around the country with fans and recruits. You don't go half way and if UCONN did that with basketball we'd still be in the American East or maybe the A-10 if we were lucky.

 

[rich1122]

I disagree. a whole bunch. Any evaluation the UCONN FB as a future business partner will come to the conclusion that the opportunity is little changed from Consultant's Report that referred to UCONN as an "SEC environment waiting to happen." More importantly, it will show that UCONN's FB fan base is incredibly resilient, especially when the bait-and-switch nature of the Program's conference affiliation is considered.

When UCONN was considering the 1A business, it was exciting to think about yearly visits from a group that included VT, Miami, BC, Cuse, Pitt, Rutgers, WVU plus the occasional, attractive OOC opponent. Before snap-one, three of the most attractive opponents had been replaced with schools with which we had no true identity. A few years later, another school bolted, followed closely by three more. I realize that's old news, but very few have mentioned the upheaval in terms of the psychological impact on the overall fan base.

On top the CR issues came the PP years. Again, any outside evaluator would see the PP years as proof positive that UCONN, like every other college FB Program, is one unfortunate coaching hire from the doldrums. Check Texas, post-Royal; USC, Post-McKay and Robinson; Oklahoma, post-Wilkinson; Notre Dame, post-Ara P and Holtz; Florida, post-Spurrier; and Alabama, post-Bryant. There are more, but the message is clear. Every FB program, even the spiffy types mentioned above, is susceptible to a poor coaching hire.

The UCONN fan base has, for the most part, shown loyalty. Through all the crap it has been put through, the base continues to purchase 23,000 plus season tickets. And, when provided with something worth watching, the fan base pulls off a Michigan, or reduces a Palko to jelly, or generates compliments from an RGIII. Any evaluation that goes back and views video from games as far back as BC and Indiana through the RE years and even a few games from the PP doldrums will see proof of a fan base that both shows up and drives opponents to distraction. The variables? Competitive UCONN vs. a recognizable opponent.

That's not to say that UCONN shouldn't be doing everything possible to fill the RENT. Anything else would be bad business/incredibly stupid. But any evaluator that doesn't understand that the right environment will make every RENT game a Michigan-like event is not looking.

Hopefully with our fans not theirs.

 

[coachcap]

My task is to entice one couple a year to become season ticket holders. This season, mission accomplished & my season ticket count increased from 10 to 12. How'd I do it? Invitation to a game or two when my daughter couldn't use her tickets due to work commitments. Get them to a game & they're hooked. The way to generate new fans is to cultivate them. But I'm preaching to the choir.

 

[J187Money]

I would handle it like this - once we know the exact pricetag - go rally the donors like they did for the BB center and try and raise at least half the money privately - then force the state's hand. We have the new Foundation guy so lets use him to make rain.

 

[IMind]

... and now the roaches appear:

kenkrayeske9:46am via Tweet Button
@UConn More seats in football stadium is, um, DUMB! What happens when you have to pay the players? #lipstickonapig

Seriously #lipstickonapig? WTF is this 2008? I can't wait for 2021 when he breaks out #yolo for the first time.

 

[DoctorWho85]

I'd like to see The Rent expanded. I think the best course of action would be to start dropping hints to donors now so by the end of the season (if UConn is doing well on the field), Warde can make a couple quick calls and get the ball rolling. I like what Warde is saying, but I would honestly like him to say something to the effect of, "Depending on fundraising and such, We'd like to have the Rent expanded within the next 5-7 years." Basically saying that we are not only interested in the future of UConn football, but we are willing to make the investment into it now to make sure it continues to grow.

 

[ktuck911]

I'm lost.. I thought the Rent currently seats 40k... ???? are we looking to add 10k more seats in 10 years? If that's the case, that's too long a wait...

 

[FAIRTIDES]

I'm lost.. I thought the Rent currently seats 40k... ???? are we looking to add 10k more seats in 10 years? If that's the case, that's too long a wait...

I think WM's "10 years" comment qualifies as either non-sequitur or throw-away line.

 

[TouchdownHusky]

I'm with Pudge and Carl on this one. The time to expand was around 2007. Consistent sellouts or near sellouts after two dreadful seasons (2005 & 2006). Pudge sounds much smarter on the bonding and financial aspect than I am, but what he's saying makes sense.

However, if we are going to stick to the "ticket demand has to be the catalyst" mantra we are doomed and will never see the Rent expanded in our lifetimes. We are not selling out the Rent in the AAC. We're just not.

Hence the need to expand first so as to be more attractive to a P5 Conference and Blue Chip recruits. The winning will come with a better caliber of recruit in every position and the sellouts will come from a competitive team playing in a P5 Conference. Expansion most definitely should have occurred in 2007, but that ship sailed. So now is the time.