USC and UCLA to the BIG Ten | Page 15 | The Boneyard

USC and UCLA to the BIG Ten

Does anyone give a crap about the Learfield cup?
 
buddy said:
Not Rutgers for sure!
Expand ...
Yeah, I guess that's pretty much true. The relative salience if that list depends on how highly you are ranked on it. Still, it's not like it's a hotly debated topic or has coverage on SportsCenter or anything.
 
2022-2023 Final B1G Capital One Cup Standings, including USC and UCLA:

Men's Cup Standings:
4. Penn State
6. Michigan
13. Ohio State
17. Indiana
19. UCLA
39. Illinois
45. USC
47. Iowa
47. Minnesota
47. Nebraska
68. Maryland
78. Wisconsin
NR. Northwestern
NR. Michigan State
NR. Purdue
NR. Rutgers

Women's Cup Standings:
4. UCLA
8. Northwestern
10. Ohio State
12. USC
19. Wisconsin
22. Iowa
29. Maryland
35. Nebraska
42. Indiana
46. Michigan
46. Minnesota
48. Penn State
81. Michigan State
NR. Illinois
NR. Purdue
NR. Rutgers

Standings for possible B1G expansion candidates:

Men's Cup Standings:
2. Stanford
5. Virginia
6. Notre Dame
9. Duke
10. UConn
18. California
25. Miami
34. Washington
45. Florida State
47. Georgia Tech
54. North Carolina
NR. Clemson
NR. Kansas
NR. Oregon

Women's Cup Standings:
2. Stanford
3. North Carolina
5. Florida State
11. Notre Dame
16. Virginia
26. Washington
36. Oregon
39. Duke
41. California
57. Clemson
57. UConn
NR. Miami
NR. Georgia Tech
NR. Kansas
 
.-.
Rufus said:
theathletic.com

How UCLA, USC joining Big Ten can change football recruiting in California and the Midwest

USC and UCLA joining the Big Ten will alter recruiting in talent-rich California. Could the Trojans and Bruins invade the Midwest too?
theathletic.com theathletic.com






read://https_theathletic.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheathletic.com%2F4700472%2F2023%2F07%2F19%2Fbig-ten-recruiting-california-usc-ucla%2F
Expand ...

Why do you post an endless litany of Big 10 propaganda? Do you realize that none of us care that much about the Big 10?
 
USC and UCLA to the BiG was seismic. The BiG breaching California and the SEC taking in Texas are clear indications that those conferences want to be dominant across all major markets. Simply, they want to be the premier conferences in college athletics and to drive the economics in their favor to the greatest extent possible. I don't think this is anywhere near over and in 10 years or so I don't think we will recognize what college athletics has become.
 
Rufus said:
You don't have to read the thread, which is a B1G thread. Do you realize this is a conference realignment board?
Expand ...

This is a UConn board. You don’t need to be here at all, and we certainly don’t need to read your relentless trolling of UConn’s conference situation with your “Big 10 is great!!!” updates all day.
 
nelsonmuntz said:
This is a UConn board. You don’t need to be here at all, and we certainly don’t need to read your relentless trolling of UConn’s conference situation with your “Big 10 is great!!!” updates all day.
Expand ...

I'll be sure to double my postings just for you.
 
.-.
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,359
Messages
4,567,648
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom