USA Basketball | Page 2 | The Boneyard

USA Basketball

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder: are we going to see many more "guests" on our board, which is still free, than we have in the past.
 
Wow - I started this thread as a tribute to USA Women's basketball and the joy I get as a Uconn fan seeing ALL the players playing well, enjoying themselves and uniting as ONE team with one GOAL and without egos about individual stats.
Degenerated a bit.
 
Wow - I started this thread as a tribute to USA Women's basketball and the joy I get as a Uconn fan seeing ALL the players playing well, enjoying themselves and uniting as ONE team with one GOAL and without egos about individual stats.
Degenerated a bit.

For some, there will always be negatives associated with this team. If it's not composition of the team -- an issue that will never go away -- it's who's starting or who's getting the proper amount of minutes or who played poorly in one game, etc. I don't understand it, but this is an open board and people can post what they want.

I appreciated your tribute to the team and I'm thrilled with how they're playing. They can always improve on certain aspects of the game (making layups and open shots), but the team is playing better D, sharing the ball and not turning the ball over as much. It's all good.
 
Did you notice the "F" next to her name? She is a FORWARD. A very good one, but she is not a "C" in the international arena.

You have the most inaccurate screen name I've seen. There is no truth to what you post, just a lot of bias.

Parker has been LA's starting center in every game she has played in and is listed by USA BASKETBALL as a G/F/C. And Geno, as evident by the game against Canada, has clearly realized Parker is one of his two best options at center with Fowles ailing. Who's inaccurate now? (Hint: look in the mirror, mutt.)

(BTW, for future reference, if you're trying to prove to someone what a player's position is, using an unofficial box score from WNBA.com really isn't the best way to go about it...)
 
Why all the fuss about who is starting? What the hell difference
does it make?

The object is to win games. So far, so good.

If they lose - that would be the appropriate time to carp about
coaching decisions, etc.
 
You do realize the purpose of a message board, right?
The quote your refer to was in response to mine re the original intent of this particular thread - praise for all the players and seeing them all as TEAM USA and not through college colored lenses. We all realize what a message board is.
As for your comments about Parker - she may be the LA center, but on team USA she is playing almost exclusively as forward with Charles, Fowles, or Jones at the center spot. She is having a great Olympics and is actually playing better off the bench than she did starting in my opinion. I thought she had the hardest time early finding her role and understanding the coaching - her having missed the 2010 WC I think showed. Now she is past the 'learning phase' and is playing fast and with a lot of confidence. A pleasure to watch.

_______________

Miami - I deleted the post to which you're responding, as we don't need gratuitous snark from TTB directed at respected posters. Since you composed a thoughtful response, TTB's can live on in your quote. -- JS
 
.-.
Parker has been LA's starting center in every game she has played in and is listed by USA BASKETBALL as a G/F/C. And Geno, as evident by the game against Canada, has clearly realized Parker is one of his two best options at center with Fowles ailing. Who's inaccurate now? (Hint: look in the mirror, mutt.)

(BTW, for future reference, if you're trying to prove to someone what a player's position is, using an unofficial box score from WNBA.com really isn't the best way to go about it...)

Mutt? I'm not a mod, but I sure think you have worn out your welcome.

She's not a center.

And, for future reference, if you are trying to prove how good a player is, it's really not the best way to use ONE boxscore to do it. Charles is a much better center than Parker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,341
Messages
4,565,879
Members
10,467
Latest member
Eil Rule


Top Bottom