While I agree w/ the sentiment - the story is increasingly expanding nationwide (as one would expect based on headline) in the current climate (and I don't mean weather).
You're right, but we're dealing with healthcare, taxes, immigration, terrorism, etc, etc, etc, and people care whether or not Edsall and Benedict violated ethics laws when they did everything in their power to avoid any ethical issues?
Here are some other examples of "nepotism".
Ethics: General Statutes Violations
Docket No. 2012-26: In the Matter of a Complaint against Roger Thomas. On June 18, 2013, the OSE entered into a Stipulation and Consent Order with Respondent for violations of CGS § 1-86 (a). The Complaint alleged that Respondent, an employee at of the Department of Transportation,
failed to inform his superiors or the OSE when he was faced with a conflict of interest involving the hiring of his son by a contractor over which he had administrative oversight. Under the terms of the settlement, Respondent was ordered to pay a civil penalty of $2,500.
Docket No. 2010-62: In the Matter of a Complaint against Donald Stitt. On April 26, 2011, the OSE and Respondent entered into a Stipulation and Consent Order, resolving allegations that Respondent, who is married to a full-time faculty member of the Theatre Arts Department at Western Connecticut State University (“WCSU”,) violated CGS § 1-84 (i) by entering into contracts in July 2009 and 2010 for services to run workshops for the Master’s in Fine Arts program,
without an open and public bid process. Under the terms of the Settlement, the OSE ordered Respondent to pay a civil penalty of $400 for his violations CGS §1-84 (i).
Docket No. 2009-75: In the Matter of a Complaint against David G. Carter. On April 20, 2011, the OSE entered into a Stipulation and Consent Order with Respondent, resolving allegations that Respondent, former Chancellor of the Connecticut State University System,
failed to inform his superiors or the OSE when he was faced with a conflict of interest involving the hiring of his spouse, a former Dean at one of the state universities, into a temporary contract following her retirement. Under the terms of the settlement, Respondent was ordered to pay a civil penalty of $2,000.
This was all done out in the open. The point of ethics is to keep people honest. This was done honestly. They shouldn't waste more than 5 minutes reviewing the facts of this.