- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,279
- Reaction Score
- 5,990
These rankings only prove that people will use the ones that fit their own agenda's. Everyone that understands rankings will generally give more credibility to Massey than they do to RPI. But they also understand that Massy is highly flawed early in the season because it uses the last ten games played. Well no teams have played ten games yet, so games from last season are factored into the score. For example that means that the last four games Uconn played last season are factored into their Massey score. They were all NCAA tournament teams, the last two being final eight and final four. The same holds true for other teams depending on how many games they have played this season.
Could anyone actually believe that UConn has played the fifth toughest schedule in the country this season? The farther a team went in the NCAA's, multiplied by the number of games used from last season would inflate their strength of schedule for this season. A team has to have played at least ten games for the Massey numbers to have any validity.
Based on this Cbus13, why would you use Massey as the standard at this time for a SOS metric?
Could anyone actually believe that UConn has played the fifth toughest schedule in the country this season? The farther a team went in the NCAA's, multiplied by the number of games used from last season would inflate their strength of schedule for this season. A team has to have played at least ten games for the Massey numbers to have any validity.
Based on this Cbus13, why would you use Massey as the standard at this time for a SOS metric?