UMass Lowell Post Game Thread | Page 7 | The Boneyard
.

UMass Lowell Post Game Thread

Lots of new pieces that need time on the floor together. Plus we were down 2 players. I’m good
That's right! The opposing coach cameo appearances on screen looked like he slipped into a catatonic depression. Now he has something to have his players emulate.
 
He’s an underrated passer. As a Seattle guy, I’m especially rooting for him.

He’s a smooth player with a nice touch. My only concern with his game so far is lack of tenacity attacking the rim. I would like to see him finish and drive more aggressively as oppose to leaning back and fade aways, even though he can make those at a fairly high rate
Hang on. Just starting his Junior year. Two full years to go. Player development product of the best coaching staff in college bb bar none.
 
Watching St Johns and comparing them to UConn it is men vs boys at this point in time. St Johns is physical, big and strong as is Bama.
Yes, UConn romped and squashed their opponent but it wasn't Bama, yet it was fun to watch Bear be Bear.

Such a strange take after 2nd game into the season, especially Johnnies lost.
 
The problem with these early season cupcake games. We are better than we were against New Haven and probably not as good as we looked tonight. We won't know anything until the BYU game. Need some game that are one possession games with 5 minutes left. Those are more exciting than these.
But we did beat an ACC and Big 10 team pretty handedly without our center. People forget. That MSU game did happen. It doesn’t count as far as stats, but I bet you the coaches and players know what’s up.
 
wu tang GIF

The first half of that game was like 20 straight minutes of Deck's verse from Triumph.
 

It's a lot of fun to watch Reed work. This guy should've been in the NBA 2 years ago if he had competent coaching from the start of his college career.
You think so? His archetype doesn't really exist in today's NBA. Who is his comp?
 
You think so? His archetype doesn't really exist in today's NBA. Who is his comp?
Sharpe a smidge longer and a bit bouncier but there are similarities there. Sharpe left as a freshmen and has developed a 3 ball some aduring his time with the Nets


 
Last edited:
You think so? His archetype doesn't really exist in today's NBA. Who is his comp?
Drummond honestly isn't that far off. Tarris is a 7'4" instead of 7'6" wingspan. But similar size/weight/strength and fluidity in movement. Ayton, Duren, those types.

Adem Bona got drafted 41st. Reed is maybe an inch shorter than Queta with the same wingspan, but stronger and better mobility.
 
You think so? His archetype doesn't really exist in today's NBA. Who is his comp?
He’ll make for a good bench big. The league still has physical rebounding types. Drummond/Jonas/Adams, I could name more but I think you get it.
 
You think so? His archetype doesn't really exist in today's NBA. Who is his comp?
It is tough sledding for big men breaking into the league because everyone wants big men that can shoot 35% plus from 3 and they want someone who can defend rim.
A player like Sanogo that can shoot 65% from 2 point range isn’t really sought after anymore.

60% from 2pt is equivalent to 40% from 3pt. I would love to see an nba buck the trend and build a team around running good offense and trying to hit high percentage 2pt shots.

One team has success with something and the every other team copies them for the next 5 years. That is why I like college basketball much better than NBA. There is a lot more variety of play styles, and every year different things work.
 
60% from 2pt is equivalent to 40% from 3pt. I would love to see an nba buck the trend and build a team around running good offense and trying to hit high percentage 2pt shots.
The piece this misses is that it's a lot easier to shoot 40% from 3 than 60% from 2. There were 38 players who hit 40% from 3 last year, but only 17 who hit 60% from 2. And there's very little overlap between the 2 lists, so there's not many guys actually making that tradeoff anyway
 
It is tough sledding for big men breaking into the league because everyone wants big men that can shoot 35% plus from 3 and they want someone who can defend rim.
A player like Sanogo that can shoot 65% from 2 point range isn’t really sought after anymore.

60% from 2pt is equivalent to 40% from 3pt. I would love to see an nba buck the trend and build a team around running good offense and trying to hit high percentage 2pt shots.

One team has success with something and the every other team copies them for the next 5 years. That is why I like college basketball much better than NBA. There is a lot more variety of play styles, and every year different things work.
Not every big has to shoot threes, but it helps for players who are undersized, like Sanogo.

Also, Sanogo’s problem is that he shot 54% from two in the G League last year. I wanted him to make it so badly, but I get why he didn’t.
 

Online statistics

Members online
461
Guests online
4,197
Total visitors
4,658

Forum statistics

Threads
165,028
Messages
4,418,683
Members
10,246
Latest member
Suzanne


.
..
Top Bottom